On 11/19/2015 at 8:15 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 19/11/2015 06:39, Martin Schiller wrote:
> > On 11/17/2015 at 8:50 AM, Martin Schiller wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> here follows a little review of the 0012-pinctrl-lantiq-fix-up-
> >> pinmux.patch
> >> to get this stuff upstream:
> >>
> >>> From
On 19/11/2015 06:39, Martin Schiller wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 at 8:50 AM, Martin Schiller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> here follows a little review of the 0012-pinctrl-lantiq-fix-up-
>> pinmux.patch
>> to get this stuff upstream:
>>
>>> From 25494c55a4007a1409f53ddbafd661636e47ea34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>> 20
On 11/17/2015 at 8:50 AM, Martin Schiller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here follows a little review of the 0012-pinctrl-lantiq-fix-up-
> pinmux.patch
> to get this stuff upstream:
>
> > From 25494c55a4007a1409f53ddbafd661636e47ea34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> > From: John Crispin
> > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 20
The device-tree files are now specified in the image Makefile
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
target/linux/imx6/profiles/120-gateworks.mk | 15 ---
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/imx6/profiles/120-gateworks.mk
b/target/linux/imx6/profiles/120-gateworks.mk
i
If the user sets any preinit options in .config, the wrong path may get
applied due to wrong default value in image-config.in and due to Makefile
writing also the unchanged options into 00_preinit.conf
Modify the default path in image-config.in to match the current default
path set by r47080. Also
Hello,
I have problem with setting up OpenWRT to Overlafs with tmpfs upper layer.
$ mount -t overlay overlay -o
lowerdir=/test1,upperdir=/test2,workdir=/work /test3
mount: mounting overlay on /test3 failed: Invalid argument
Can someone help me, where problem can be?
Thanks.
_
On 11/17/2015 at 4:10 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 17/11/2015 16:06, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> > 2015-11-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Martin Schiller :
> >> This patch introduces new dedicated "pinctrl-ase", "pinctrl-danube",
> >> "pinctrl-xrx100" and "pinctrl-xrx200" configuration tables.
> >>
> >> Ba
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Baptiste Jonglez <
bapti...@bitsofnetworks.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:32:11AM +0100, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> > It's not always desirable to request option 121 by default. Some ISPs
> > explicitly demand not to request option 121;
>
> Interesti
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:32:11AM +0100, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> It's not always desirable to request option 121 by default. Some ISPs
> explicitly demand not to request option 121;
Interesting, do you have any reference? Reading RFC 2131 (especially the
end of section 4.3.1), it seems to me
Hi,
It's not always desirable to request option 121 by default. Some ISPs
explicitly demand not to request option 121; therefore it's better to
specify the option explicitly in the reqopts parameter if needed.
Bye,
Hans
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Baptiste Jonglez <
bapti...@bitsofnetworks
10 matches
Mail list logo