The command:(svn help export) does not display trust-server-cert
option by default even if it is supported with svn version 1.13.0.
Signed-off-by: kai zhang
---
include/download.mk | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/download.mk b/include/download.mk
Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2020, 23:39:08 CEST schrieb Rosen Penev:
> > Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:38 PM, Nick a écrit :
> >
> > I would suggest doing this PR as patch like freifunk berlin is doing it:
> > https://github.com/freifunk-berlin/firmware/commit/93f9a026e025c7b663369f5
> > 284cec0bb91345220
>
> Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:38 PM, Nick a écrit :
>
> I would suggest doing this PR as patch like freifunk berlin is doing it:
> https://github.com/freifunk-berlin/firmware/commit/93f9a026e025c7b663369f5284cec0bb91345220
Someone needs to propose one then.
>
> Otherwise, olsrd won't compile anymore.
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io
Commit: 8eec96afe126fbc48ec648a0165e7ec5138d5e6a
https://github.com/sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io/commit/8eec96afe126fbc48ec648a0165e7ec5138d5e6a
Author: Stephen Walker
Date: 2020-06-07 (Sun, 07 Jun
I would suggest doing this PR as patch like freifunk berlin is doing it:
https://github.com/freifunk-berlin/firmware/commit/93f9a026e025c7b663369f5284cec0bb91345220
Otherwise, olsrd won't compile anymore. :/ Or making a fork, because
olsrd seems not to be maintained anymore.
On 07.06.20 22:27,
Here is a PR that is fixing the issue. Why is that not merged? :/
https://github.com/OLSR/olsrd/pull/79/files
On 07.06.20 22:03, Rosen Penev wrote:
>
>> Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:00 PM, Nick a écrit :
>>
>> I can not compile olsrd daemon with gcc9.
>>> #define isNaN(x) (x != x)
>>> ...
>>> if
> Le 7 juin 2020 à 1:00 PM, Nick a écrit :
>
> I can not compile olsrd daemon with gcc9.
>> #define isNaN(x) (x != x)
>> ...
>> if (!isNaN(gpsdata->fix.time)) {
> Here fix.time is a struct timespec.
> The call is just wrong, or? Why should I check a struct for a valid float?
This broke when
I can not compile olsrd daemon with gcc9.
> #define isNaN(x) (x != x)
> ...
> if (!isNaN(gpsdata->fix.time)) {
Here fix.time is a struct timespec.
The call is just wrong, or? Why should I check a struct for a valid float?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On 06.06.20 15:19, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Bjørn Mork writes:
I wonder if I have understood this correctly:
1) vlan_filtering is required when bridging tagged and untagged DSA
ports, and
2) all bridge ports, including the wireless VIFs, must be configured
with the correct VIDs when
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:52:23 -0700 Rosen Penev wrote:
> Switched to upstream tarballs.
>
> Switched to libcxxabi as using libsupc++ is quite wonky.
>
> Fixed description.
>
> Removed patches. The fixes are cosmetic.
>
> Added ssp patch. This one is needed for i386 and powerpc under musl.
>
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 11:52:22 -0700 Rosen Penev wrote:
> This will be used for libcxx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
> ---
> package/libs/libcxxabi/Makefile | 71 +
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 package/libs/libcxxabi/Makefile
>
>
Hi Matthias,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthias Schiffer
> Sent: Sonntag, 7. Juni 2020 13:33
> To: Adrian Schmutzler
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] treewide:
On 6/7/20 1:11 PM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Many target use a repetitive if-include scheme for their subtarget
> image files, though their names are consistent with the subtarget
> names.
>
> This patch removes these redundant conditions and just uses the
> variable for the include where the
With several subtargets, the image/Makefile becomes crowded after a
while. Many targets have moved their device definitions to $subtarget.mk
files to have them more organized, let's do this here as well.
While at it, also move subtarget-specific build recipes.
Cc: Christian Lamparter
With several subtargets, the image/Makefile becomes crowded after a
while. Many targets have moved their device definitions to $subtarget.mk
files to have them more organized, let's do this here as well.
Cc: Rafał Miłecki
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
target/linux/bcm47xx/image/Makefile
Many target use a repetitive if-include scheme for their subtarget
image files, though their names are consistent with the subtarget
names.
This patch removes these redundant conditions and just uses the
variable for the include where the target setup allows it.
For sunxi, this includes a
I've just set up a new RT-AC85P as one of three access points on my
network, and it seems to be having problems with wireless clients which
have roamed to it (or just newly associated to it) after being on one
of the other APs.
Incoming packets to the new wireless client aren't being received on
The BCM63167 is a BCM63268 SoC with a different physical packaging.
Add the CPU ID to allow supporting routers with this SoC (i.e Sercomm
H500-s)
Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas
---
Changes in v2: none
Changes in v3: none
Changes in v4: none
Changes in v5: none
There is no need to include the CFE bootloader in the Sercomm factory
images.
There might be a case when this could be useful:
- We are running the stock firmware on the first Sercomm image
- The second partition storing the botloader was erased (unlikely)
Even in this case flashing an image
Sercomm H500-s is an xDSL dual band wireless router based on Broadcom
BCM63167 SoC.
Hardware:
SoC: Broadcom BCM63167
CPU: BMIPS4350 V8.0, 400 MHz, 2 cores
Flash:NAND 128 MiB
RAM: DDR3 128 MiB
Ethernet: 4x 10/100/1000 Mbps
Switch:
Not all CFEs will need to relocate the kernel (i.e H500-s), therefore
we'll need to pass a different address and not the LOADER_ENTRY.
Let to pass the addr to the image creation when neccessary.
Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas
---
Changes in v2: refresh
Changes in v3: none
Changes in
21 matches
Mail list logo
