Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?
Hi! Come to the Battlemesh event in Slovenia this year, almost as close to Hungary as you can get. :-) https://wlan-si.net/en/blog/2015/03/29/announcing-battlemesh-v8-in-maribor-slovenia/ Mitar On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:02 AM, bkil bk.il.hu+ibla_q...@gmail.com wrote: If anyone wants to organize a BattleMesh event in Hungary, I would vote for that and have a near industrial amount of various compatible hardware standing by! On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Gergely Kiss mail.g...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/21/2015 08:51 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2015 at 21:26, Gergely Kiss mail.g...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Valent, first of all, I strongly disagree with people claiming that OpenWrt sucks because it doesn't. For me it rather looks like a well-maintained, rapidly improving project with a great number of actively supported hardware and quite a few people contributing to snip Do you think OpenWrt sucks? Then stop complaining and do something to make it better. It's that simple. Cheers, Gergely Hi Gergely, thanks for your reply and for your contribution to OpenWrt. But I have to ask - have you read my message apart from headline? If you have read it you will see that I'm defending OpenWrt and I definitely don't think it sucks! Hi Valent, I'm sorry, that paragraph wasn't addressed to you but to people claiming that OpenWrt sucks. Of course, I have read your message, I never reply to a message I haven't read in its entirety. I contribute to it everyday, but not (yet) as a developer but as advanced user, forum and wiki contributor and have organized multiple workshops all accross Croatia, Serbia and Macedonia to get people to use OpenWrt. That's great! Any plans to come to Hungary someday? :) Cheers, Valent. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel -- http://mitar.tnode.com/ https://twitter.com/mitar_m ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Trac anti-spam measures
Hi! I am unable to add to this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8293 My comment: This will probably help also OpenWrt support: [http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Android-drivers-to-be-included-in-Linux-3-3-kernel-1400996.html Android Drivers to be Included in Linux 3.3 Kernel]. It says it is spam. What is procedure to be accepted? Is it possible to get a username on Trac so that I could participate in OpenWrt development without anti-spam harassment? Thanks Mitar ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] MikroTik RB411AR and internal WiFi
Hi! I have got RB411AR into testing and there are really problems using madwifi on built-in AR2417. I have attached some errors to the ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6434 Is there any way those problems could be solved? Mitar ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] MikroTik RB411AR and internal WiFi
Hi! I have read here: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6434 That there are problems with MikroTik RB411AR and internal WiFi. Is this (still) true? Any progress? As I would really like to use this board as it allows me (in theory) to have both N and G radios working at the same time. Mitar ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Ethernet on MikroTik RB411AH
Hi! I am trying to get ethernet working on MikroTik RB411AH. As I understand in trunk OpenWrt version it does work? So I have backported it from trunk to our 8.09 (yea, I know, old) firmware which is using 2.6.27 kernel. After some twiddling around I got it to compile, but ethernet still does not work. When booting it writes: ag71xx_mdio: probed eth0: Atheros AG71xx at 0xb900, irq 4 eth0: unable to find MII bus on device 'ag71xx-mdio' The source I am using is here: http://wlan-lj.net/browser/trunk/openwrt-200901/target/linux/ar71xx And the problem is this line: http://wlan-lj.net/browser/trunk/openwrt-200901/target/linux/ar71xx/files/drivers/net/ag71xx/ag71xx_phy.c?rev=1172#L191 So, what should I do next? I have tried printing what does dev_is_class function see and it is called twice both time dev-class being NULL. Mitar ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Mercurial or Git repository for OpenWrt?
Hi! I am wondering if it would be possible to migrate OpenWrt's SVN repository to Mercurial or Git. In this way it would be much much easier to develop OpenWrt based projects and pull/merge new code changes from OpenWrt repository to projects' repositories. Trac also supports both Mercurial and Git. I think this would be the best approach in a longer run. Or at least if there would be a Mercurial/Git read-only repository which would be kept in sync with SVN repository so that changes could be pulled from it. I know I can establish such sync locally, but I would like to open a question as maybe it would benefit also others to have Mercurial or Git access to source changes. Mitar ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Mercurial or Git repository for OpenWrt?
Hi! On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Jan Williesj...@willies.info wrote: If you prefer working with git, it is possible to use: * git://nbd.name/openwrt.git (clone of trunk) * git://nbd.name/packages.git (clone of packages) I must have been blind. ;-) Mitar ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
