Hi!
I have a WRT160NL with the 3 interfaces (eth0, eth1, wlan0) on a single
bridge (br-lan) and I was normally doing filtering between them but now
all the packets are unconditionally bridged to all the interfaces
despite the ebtables rules. ebtables doesn't report hits on rules.
My last
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
Le 03/27/12 15:43, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
Hi!
I have a WRT160NL with the 3 interfaces (eth0, eth1, wlan0) on a single
bridge (br-lan) and I was normally doing filtering between them but now
all the packets
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:03:24PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
however my issue is that hostapd isn't coming up for ap mode.
Yeah in 3.3 the mon.wlan0 i/f is not being setup but I didn't
investigate further.
OTOH is just me or do you note too that the compressed firmware
image with the 3.3 kernel
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:47:03PM +0300, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2012-03-29 1:51 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2012-03-29 11:50 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 03/28/12 00:49, Otto Solares Cabrera a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
Le 03
Regarding the problem of users playing with config options and not
mentioning it, part of the solution could be to require users to submit
their .config files when reporting issues. In such a case, having the
kernel version in there too would actually be better than relying on
users
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:50:56PM +0900, 马进 wrote:
Hi all,
Where could I find the configuration file for wireless based on ath9k
driver?
I want to know how to configure the beacon time, beacon time interval and
so on.
Is it hostapd.conf?
Add your needed options in /etc/config/wireless:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
Please look at the kernel config file above. You will see that
CONFIG_PREEMPT should be used on embedded systems...
Doesn't CONFIG_PREEMPT will add userspace scheduling overhead which
in turn harm kernelspace workloads such as packet
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:31:31AM +0200, Roberto Riggio wrote:
This patch upgrades the mjpeg-streamer package to the latest svn
revision. It also closes track entry #9896 in the the newer version
moved to v4l2.
This patch it doesn't apply.
mjpg-streamer r150 works for me too.
-
Otto
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:20:45AM +0200, Roberto Riggio wrote:
It is the output of svn diff. Rev 150 was from the experimental branch
so I was not sure how stable it was (considering the mjpeg streamer is
pretty volatile).
Just FYI I was having problems in many cams with stable and
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 06:51:19PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Personally I would have submitted these two patches separately so that one
doesn't hold up the other, especially since they're not visibly related in
any way.
+1
On 10/23/11 6:22 PM, Andrej Vlašić wrote:
This enables
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Otto Estuardo Solares Cabrera
so...@guug.org wrote:
This patch series adds Linux-3.0 kernel support to the ar71xx
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum
kernel version is probably still 3.1.1. Successfully tested with kernel 3.1.4
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Gabor Juhos wrote:
2012.01.18. 4:42 keltezéssel, Otto Solares Cabrera írta:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support
of nbd ;-) It took me a while
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:34:58PM -0500, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Updating to Linaro 4.6 2012.02 has fixed those code generation bugs I
was hitting. 2012.02 can also compile openssl for ARMv5 again (some
Cortex changes had broken it).
JFYI 2012.02 works fine for me on all my targets,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 01:47:09PM -0500, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Otto Solares so...@guug.org wrote:
I meant to send this offlist, I'm very sorry. :)
I'm thinking many in the audience are quite impressed.
Thank you for your kind words!
I would love to work
15 matches
Mail list logo
