Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread James Cloos
 JC == John Crispin j...@phrozen.org writes:

JC * unit most likely runs on a ghz arm soc made by marvell

IIRC, semiaccurate reported that it uses an atom processor.

-JimC
--
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

2014-01-21 Thread James Cloos
 SM == Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de writes:

SM That truly was reported on semiaccurate.com as an atom part:
SM 
http://semiaccurate.com/2014/01/06/linksys-wrt1900ac-spritual-successor-wrt54g/

Thanks for finding that!

SM (but later updated with a correction)

-JimC
--
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


[OpenWrt-Devel] bb vs cable modem

2013-08-09 Thread James Cloos
I recently replaced my bricked wrt54gs with a wndr3800.

I first tried the BB snapshot from the 6th.  I didn't notice right away,
so it might only happen after a few hours, but w/in a day at least it
caused the doccis bridge to reset every minute or two.

Downgrading to the current AA release fixed that.

The only thing I added to the base install was aiccu, which of course
pulls in a number of ipv6-related packages.  I'm not sure whether BB's
v6 wan-side support was to blame, but it might have been?

I'm not sure whether a bug report would be welcome, given the limited
nature of the information?

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel