Re: [PATCH 2/4] base-files/functions.sh: do not iterate over ls

2020-09-20 Thread edgar . soldin
On 20.09.2020 07:31, Rosen Penev wrote: > - for file in $(ls $1/*.sh 2>/dev/null); do > - . $file > + for file in "$1"/*.sh; do > + [ -e "$file" ] || break > + . "$file" the existence check is probably meant to catch "../*.sh" entry found if no files

[OpenWrt-Devel] time for OJ 1.15 everyone?

2020-01-06 Thread edgar . soldin
new year, new OJ. start of the year is OJ release time traditionally by now. are we in agreement? a snappy new NY to one and all ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [JPP-Devel] Fwd: SVN: [6214] core/trunk

2020-01-06 Thread edgar . soldin
On 06.01.2020 12:37, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, > > I did a quick try and it seems to work fine. > Seems that the change you did is rather big. I'll try to go deeper into your > change to try to understand. go ahead :) > What about the SO remark >

[OpenWrt-Devel] test

2019-12-19 Thread Edgar Soldin
___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1 1/1] openssh: disable passwords for openssh server

2018-02-15 Thread edgar . soldin
hey All, On 2/15/2018 20:50, Magnus Kroken wrote: >>> This is just about the default configuration, it's not a choice between >>> conflicting compile time options with varying security implications. While >>> key authentication may be best practice, allowing SSH password logins isn't >>> on

[OpenWrt-Devel] international keyboard layout support

2016-06-02 Thread edgar . soldin
hey All, while tinkering with Gluon the Openwrt based Freifunk firmware (currently on CC) on a x86 based thin client box i needed support for a german keyboard layout. i managed to realize that manually as i didn't find any prepared packages for this purpose. is there any interest in a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

2016-01-22 Thread edgar . soldin
thx John! neat.. that should do the trick. finally a small ssl capable wget, jippee! ..ede On 22.01.2016 22:32, John Clark wrote: > There is a symbolic link: > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root13 Jan 22 20:04 wget -> > uclient-fetch* > > > On 1/22/16 4:29 PM, edgar.sol...@web.de

[OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

2016-01-22 Thread edgar . soldin
On 22.01.2016 14:32, Weedy wrote: >> Question: The busybox binary (for me) goes from 366,401 bytes to 300,327 > with the removal of wget from it. Therefore, the uclient-fetch binary > swapout causes a 46,379 byte increase in size. I assume the desire to move > to uclient-fetch from busybox is for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition / paid patch-checking

2015-10-13 Thread edgar . soldin
On 13.10.2015 12:44, Imre Kaloz wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:33:35 +0200, Bastian Bittorf > wrote: > > > >> It should be easy possible to get funding from all the companies which >> work with OpenWrt. Is this in option? > > Not until we have a nonprofit organization

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

2015-09-10 Thread edgar . soldin
How about Trusty Trunk.. no cocktail though.. so far.. ede On 10.09.2015 22:08, Tobias Welz wrote: > Just following up with the T... T... idea - I found some T T Cocktails: > > Tahitian Tea > Tahitian Treat > Tanqueray Tonic > Tanzanian Tonic > > > > Am 09.09.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Hannu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

2015-09-04 Thread edgar . soldin
On 04.09.2015 11:51, karlp wrote: > include() { > local file > > for file in $(ls $1/*.sh

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

2015-09-04 Thread edgar . soldin
On 04.09.2015 12:36, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * edgar.sol...@web.de [04.09.2015 12:30]: >> note from a bystander. this looks wrong - path/file names containing spaces >> will be delimited by for. probably better use > > for the sent patch this works: > > root@box:~ touch "A

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

2015-09-04 Thread edgar . soldin
On 04.09.2015 13:55, Karl Palsson wrote: > Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> Hi. > >>> Why the -e? You only got existing files in the glob above right? > >> Almost. If the directory does not exist or is empty then the glob >> pattern is returned literally, e.g. "echo /tmp/*" will

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Combine CA-certificates in one file

2015-06-14 Thread edgar . soldin
On 12.06.2015 21:20, micke.p...@telldus.se wrote: 2015-06-12 09:39 skrev Cristian Morales Vega: On 12 June 2015 at 08:30, micke.p...@telldus.se wrote: Some packages or libraries cannot use split ca cetificates in a folder. This adds a config to combine all certificates into one file. I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wrong configured spam-filter for openwrt-dev

2015-05-01 Thread edgar . soldin
On 30.04.2015 12:48, Bastian Bittorf wrote: while sending a mail to openwrt-dev, i got this answer, which doesnt make any sense, because the list only accepts registered users anyway: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org: host mail.openwrt.org[78.24.191.176] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt DD release name v2

2015-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
ok, took the freedom to set up another vote, incl. the third option. let's see what the numbers say in a few days. http://doodle.com/9d262b569bh4r7kv it'd make sense that everybody retakes the vote to have the truest election result. regards ..ede

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes properly, manually as seems necessary. +1 for Designated Driver ..ede PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now On Tue, Apr 7, 2015

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

2015-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
On 08.04.2015 00:45, David Lang wrote: On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote: On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer. How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for anything else. There are three

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

2015-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
On 08.04.2015 00:33, Peter Lawler wrote: On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer. How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for anything else. simply write your vote in the subject and have a mail body that

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt release name

2015-04-06 Thread edgar . soldin
On 06.04.2015 09:35, John Crispin wrote: i think we have a winner with 96 vs 50 votes. == Dirty Diamond == 2 cl Rum 2 cl Vodka 2 cl Tequila Silver 2 cl Campari 2 cl Curaçao Blue 2 cl Lime syrup 2 1/2 cl Orange juice Coca Cola i also liked ==

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] dnsmasq: add option --quiet-dhcp

2015-01-09 Thread edgar . soldin
On 07.01.2015 23:50, Lars Kruse wrote: The --quiet-dhcp setting increases privacy by omitting DHCP lease logs including MAC addresses. Signed-off-by: Lars Kruse de...@sumpfralle.de --- a/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init +++

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Help, how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot)

2014-10-11 Thread edgar . soldin
On 11.10.2014 20:40, document wrote: hi, how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot) ? i have openvpn-2.3.2 installed from opkg but when i manually start it about 1min passed, router (openwrt-12.09) will reboot. when i enabled openvpn service on startup, router will auto reboot forever.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support

2014-06-16 Thread edgar . soldin
On 16.06.2014 10:40, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org wrote: Hi Nikos, Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in. The main problem

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support

2014-06-16 Thread edgar . soldin
On 16.06.2014 11:56, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety of software; polarssl is closed commercial

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] how to set busybox's some options now ?

2013-12-17 Thread edgar . soldin
On 17.12.2013 16:14, Yousong Zhou wrote: On 17 December 2013 22:13, openwrt-de...@couprie.net openwrt-de...@couprie.net wrote: Hi yousong, Can you give a example how to call menuconfig for busybox ? I am doing menuconfig for busybox in OpenWrt build environment in which busybox tarball

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question on UCI Lua license

2013-08-14 Thread edgar . soldin
On 13.08.2013 21:54, Jeff Remy wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding the UCI Lua bindings license. libuci itself is LGPLv2.1, the cli utility is GPLv2 and the Lua bindings are GPLv2. I was wondering if this was on purpose? It does not seem to be in line with the library but again, there

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Iozone openwrt package

2013-05-31 Thread edgar . soldin
On 31.05.2013 13:48, devendra.aaru wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bastian Bittorf bitt...@bluebottle.com wrote: * devendra.aaru devendra.a...@gmail.com [31.05.2013 13:44]: The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source code of iozone and i bit modified it since

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WR841ND to replace WRT54GL?

2013-03-06 Thread edgar . soldin
On 06.03.2013 19:40, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:33:44PM +0100, a...@mykolab.com wrote: The TL-WR841ND may very well be a good choice. You can also consider the TL-WR1043ND, it has solid support (I have had about four of them and tested rather heavily over time). It

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Maintainer address not reachable [Was: [PATCH] net/freeswitch: Make upstream-defaults package installable]

2013-02-27 Thread edgar . soldin
On 27.02.2013 15:33, Florian Fainelli wrote: Hello, On 01/31/2013 09:11 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: Hello, I just got a mailer daemon notice that open...@slickdeals.endjunk.com didn't get this mail because the mail server for its domain couldn't be connected by mine. Who cares for the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling custom kernel for latest trunk

2013-01-15 Thread edgar . soldin
On 15.01.2013 16:41, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: Le 12/01/2013 16:08, darius a écrit : Hello, Simple question for those who know. I do 'make kernel_menuconfig' then select some needed features in kernel and then do 'make -j3' in topdir. After image is done, I install it on the router, but my

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Initial support for Mikrotik RB751G-2HnD and RB751U-2HnD

2012-04-05 Thread edgar . soldin
this is different from client to client. if unsure or unable to fix it simply attach the patch to the email. this way it will survive whatever comes. people on this mailing list like the patches inline for commenting, but heck.. if it does not work out for you, simply attach it (for usage)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: Hi, would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving almost no headroom for further functionality, and https

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
Maybe you are lucky and someone steps up. You are probably better of finding the maintainer (if there's one) directly by looking at the revision log or asking in the openwrt irc channel. The mailing list is often slow in this regard. If it all does not happen in time frame you planned in then

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are selected? don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was build first? ..ede On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote: Hi, look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

2012-02-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.02.2012 12:24, cl...@bit63.org wrote: In this case I am not sure what the best course of action is. What is the OpenWRT way to enable kernel options that aren't kernel modules? you can add a simple config var to your Makefile, like CONFIG_KERNEL_*=y these are automatically translated to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WBMR-HP-G300H flash image for flashing from original FW?

2012-02-23 Thread edgar . soldin
On 23.02.2012 19:21, John Crispin wrote: dd-wrt webif on openwrt? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] reaver-wps package Makefile available

2012-01-04 Thread edgar . soldin
for the unaware http://code.google.com/p/reaver-wps/ somebody created a package Makefile for reaver in the forum https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=152639 ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Help -- Noob Question -- Driving Me Crazy

2011-11-11 Thread edgar . soldin
On 11.11.2011 20:51, Mike Brady wrote: Can someone tell be or direct me to an example of how to put a linux version conditional into an OpenWrt package Makefile please? What I want to do is say if this is and version of Linux 2.4 then do stufft. I've tried something like ifeq

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance

2011-09-20 Thread edgar . soldin
On 20.09.2011 13:56, bifferos wrote: I'd like to provide a binary build of OpenWrt packages, however I want to comply with the terms of the GPL. I figured the most obvious thing to do would be to copy the way OpenWrt does things. I'm not convinced that OpenWrt complies with the GPL with

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
On 02.09.2011 12:39, Luka Perkov wrote: Hi, On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for CONFIG_PREEMPT: Select this if you are building a kernel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

2011-08-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.08.2011 16:14, Jan Willies wrote: Hi Luka, 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net define Package/openvpn SECTION:=net CATEGORY:=Network + SUBMENU:=VPN DEPENDS:=+kmod-tun +libopenssl +PACKAGE_openvpn_complzo:liblzo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

2011-08-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: 2011/8/29 edgar.sol...@web.de mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de On 29.08.2011 16 tel:29.08.2011%2016:14, Jan Willies wrote: Hi Luka, 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

2011-08-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.08.2011 17:14, Jonas Gorski wrote: On 29 August 2011 17:04, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: 2011/8/29 edgar.sol...@web.de mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de On 29.08.2011 16 tel:29.08.2011%2016:14, Jan Willies wrote: Hi Luka, 2011/8/21

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

2011-08-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.08.2011 18:17, Luka Perkov wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Willies wrote: 2011/8/29 edgar.sol...@web.de right missed that. and yes reversing would be most elegant. ede I don't see why reversing would be most elegant. Now you can fully tweak your openvpn package.

[OpenWrt-Devel] cts 0.2 stable geomconv 0.3rc2 released

2011-06-28 Thread edgar . soldin
continuing my daily release cycle here comes CTS (coordinate transfomation services) Extension, stable until proven otherwise, translated into english, german, spanish, italian Geometry Converter Extension 0.3rc2 fixing a bug where it simply did nothing if an older version of my other

[OpenWrt-Devel] Please ignore: cts 0.2 stable geomconv 0.3rc2 released

2011-06-28 Thread edgar . soldin
... sorry again ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Make package foo conflict with /replace package bar

2011-06-12 Thread edgar . soldin
On 10.06.2011 08:43, harish badrinath wrote: Hello, If i have a package called foo, How do it specify in its Makefile (package/foo/Makefile) that it conflicts with / replaces a package called bar. When that happens the compilation is aborted until package bar is deselected. try what

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-27 Thread edgar . soldin
works for me on a asus wl-500w. thanks, ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.05.2011 20:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: P.S. Please, don't top post :) why shouldn't he? it's not like you couldn't understand his message, is it? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.05.2011 21:12, Peter Wagner wrote: i think its more about - he asks me in a polite way not to toppost :) and if someone asks in a nice way - you can see what you can get ;) he did indeed. probably i just overreact on this. it's like somebody is telling how to talk (in which order)... i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
Could you post your makefile here?.. ede On 12.05.2011 02:02, John Zavgren wrote: Thanks, Christian: I read the article on the wiki and then I tried make package/vislinkRcv/compile from the TOPDIR (vislinkRcv is the stuff that I'm developing) and no KLM was actually built. When I do the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
isn't it build in the build_dir or just not installed? i see no install definition in your makefile. as jow wrote f you can you should consider packaging your source as an out-of-tree module, see for example the KernelPackage / kmod defintions in package/wprobe/Makefile . ede On 12.05.2011

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
so where does a (in buildroot root) $ make package/pkg/{clean,compile} V=99 leave you?... attach the output or pastebin it .. also check if the new binary is created in builddir ..ede On 12.05.2011 16:08, John Zavgren wrote: It get's built and staged when I do a global make. I want a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
welcome.. you could also manually remove builddir. buildroot is putting files in builddir (.prepared and the like). this is to circumvent to prepare,rebuild,install something again (e.g. when recompile an image with one added pkg added in menuconfig). keep that in mind and you are set for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Status of outstanding patches

2011-03-26 Thread edgar . soldin
write to Travis Kemen thepeo...@openwrt.org about the maintainer issue.. in case he didn't read your mail to the end.. regards ede On 25.03.2011 22:46, W. Michael Petullo wrote: vips-7.24.1.patch, upgrade VIPS to 7.24.1 https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8467 I'd be happy to take

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnsmasq leasefile fix

2011-02-15 Thread edgar . soldin
On 15.02.2011 11:13, Ferenc Wagner wrote: Peter Wagner tripo...@gmx.at writes: - [ -n $leasefile ] [ -e $leasefile ] || touch $leasefile + [ -n $leasefile ] ( [ -e $leasefile ] || touch $leasefile ) Looks like this is fixed already by commit 15fba44a (but see point 6 of

[OpenWrt-Devel] build brcm-24 image with trunk

2011-02-01 Thread edgar . soldin
Is there a way to build a kernel 2.4 image for brcm47xx platform with the current buildroot in trunk? The target brcm-2.4 was removed a while ago. How would I do so, except of going back in svn history? thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: refactoring load_modules()

2011-01-20 Thread edgar . soldin
On 20.01.2011 06:50, Scott Nicholas wrote: I like Bastian's refactorings using only ash builtins. if ever a micro image is needed, sed/awk can go away. yes? for micro images usually busybox is used and awk/sed are available busybox applets. i really doubt that the size increase is in

[OpenWrt-Devel] gawk package

2010-12-27 Thread edgar . soldin
Could you please add http://projects.qi-hardware.com/index.php/p/openwrt-packages/source/tree/release_2010-11-17/gawk/Makefile to the package repository. Thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

[OpenWrt-Devel] sextante loading mystery solved

2010-11-03 Thread edgar . soldin
phew, that was something. As it turns out. es.unex.sextante.openjump.extensions.SextanteToolboxPlugin detects the path to the extension dir as follows String sPath = System.getProperty(user.dir) + /lib/ext; 'user.dir' despite it's name holds the current working dir of the java vm. The old

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] sextante loading mystery solved

2010-11-03 Thread edgar . soldin
I do .. these open* projects all look the same in thunderbirds address suggestions .. I will have to find a solution for that. thanks sorry, again, ede On 03.11.2010 20:10, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You keep writing to the wrong list ;) -BEGIN

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Package dnsmasq init-file

2010-10-27 Thread edgar . soldin
On 27.10.2010 14:13, Bastian Bittorf wrote: If an already running DHCP-server is found on the configured interface, the init-script refuses to start, but does not give a hint why. It took us some days to track down this behavior in our MANET, where every wifi/adhoc-node runs it own DHCP-server.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] font for oj logo needed

2010-10-27 Thread edgar . soldin
sorry wrong list again, please ignore .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] openjump.exe with ini

2010-09-01 Thread edgar . soldin
The reasons for a unified java launcher would be - java, which most contributors should understand - one ini file for all architectures - one routine to replace them all ;) (set classpath, build cmd line) sounds worth it to me. ..ede On 01.09.2010 17:34, Larry Becker wrote: It doesn't seem

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Trojan in OJ.exe: Positive false message

2010-08-28 Thread edgar . soldin
I am tired of antivirus detecting viruses in the oj.exe windows starter. We can't send to each and every of them that it is a false positive every time. Solution: We have a working batch file starter. Having a second starter is a) confusing and b) unfortunately unsettling users with virus

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Trojan in OJ.exe: Positive false message

2010-08-28 Thread edgar . soldin
Wrong list .. sorry, please ignore .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dnsmasq bogus nxdomains

2010-07-16 Thread edgar . soldin
sweet, simple and effective. You should put the example configuration on the wiki as well for others suffering the symptoms. thanks ede On 16.07.2010 21:57, mickey wrote: Hello, this patch extends the dnsmasq initscript with an option for bogus-nxdomain. From the manpage: -B,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Re: VS: Off-list: Mobile GPS solution in OJ

2010-06-23 Thread edgar . soldin
...@latuviitta.fimailto:jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi wrote: Edgar Soldin wrote: On 08.06.2010 16:48, Larry Becker wrote: Seems like GPSylon is a large program and you only need the small portion ( gpsinput library?) that communicates with GPS devices

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] failed to install feed oprofile

2010-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
You need to use kernel 2.6. Enable menuconfig-Global build settings-Compile the kernel with profiling enabled then enable menuconfig-Development-oprofile Don't forget to recompile the kernel. ede On 24.05.2010 11:13, oii...@aol.com wrote: thank you, I couldn't find the oprofile option in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-11 Thread edgar . soldin
On 11.05.2010 17:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. I expect that a kernel with some modules built-in will be smaller (both in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
there is partly in https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/include/kernel-defaults.mk line 101 you can actually add CONFIG_KERNEL_* entries to your .config and they are copied over as CONFIG_* to the kernel config. All that's missing is a menuconfig interface for that. But at least for routers

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. ..ede On 10.05.2010 19:16, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: It may not downsize the packages themselves, but moving

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
are these sizes fixed or calculated according the space requirement? Looks like the linux size is fixed, what is the maximum size for a kernel on wrt54g? .. ede On 10.05.2010 23:28, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: Kernel and rootfs are in two different mtd partitions on the WRT54G: # dmesg

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
Then it'd make total sense to stuff in whatever fits there .. thanks for the enlightenment, ede On 10.05.2010 23:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: The linux partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for flashing. The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of rootfs) minus

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
On 10.05.2010 23:47, Bernhard Loos wrote: 2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos bernhardl...@googlemail.com: 2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany m...@maddes.net: The linux partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for flashing. The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of rootfs) minus

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-09 Thread edgar . soldin
That's how it works. Y adds kernel modules to the kernel, and programs to the image. ..ede On 09.05.2010 18:10, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: In 'make menuconfig' I included them with 'Y' instead of 'M'. According to my (newbie) knowledge that adds them to the kernel image. Can somebody

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-09 Thread edgar . soldin
true, my bad, actually one can see it in the end of a make run, how the packages (incl. kmods) are installed to the image filesystem. thanks ede On 09.05.2010 18:19, Bernhard Loos wrote: Actually, Y in menuconfig doesn't add the modules into the kernel, they will still be kernel modules. It

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Stopping watchdog

2010-05-03 Thread edgar . soldin
On 03.05.2010 15:59, Yury Polyanskiy wrote: On Mon, 3 May 2010 09:35:59 + Vasilis Tsiligiannisb_tsiligian...@silverton.gr wrote: + [ -c /dev/watchdog ] echo V /dev/watchdog Why is this needed? busybox watchdog applet writes the magic on shutdown. What is magic? In this

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple setups on an ethernet interface

2010-04-15 Thread edgar . soldin
Apropos custom rules .. this patch is still pending .. ede On 15.04.2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Remaining problem is access to the dsl modem, a new zone should be created to allow masquerading, and I don't see how eth0.1 could be in wan

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple setups on an ethernet interface

2010-04-15 Thread edgar . soldin
You did earlier (9.12.2009) .. https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005384.html anyway you are right. They can be pulled manually as well. These vars were set in white russian, but didn't survive kamikaze. I feel they are convenient. LANDEV is missing because it

[OpenWrt-Devel] Ping: Fwd: add vars for uci firewall include scripts

2010-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
and again .. a reminder of the reminder .. thanks ede Original Message hi jow, just a friendly reminder .. Thanks ede Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:37 +0100 From:

[OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: [PATCH] block-*; the right one this time :-/

2010-03-20 Thread edgar . soldin
Seems like chore's block mount fsck patches didn't make it into trunk. the rest seems to be there .. Regards ede Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] block-*; the right one this time :-/ Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:29:02 -0500 From: Daniel Dickinson csh...@csolve.net

[OpenWrt-Devel] svn download error caused by changeset 20299

2010-03-20 Thread edgar . soldin
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/20299 breaks compatibility to svn version before 1.6, when it was introduced. error: Checking out files from the svn repository... svn: invalid option: --trust-server-cert Type 'svn help' for usage. Regards ede ___

[OpenWrt-Devel] syslog-ng3 latest and log kernel messages patch

2010-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
this patch adds logging of kernel messages to the config file upgrades to latest version 3.0.5 Thanks Ede Index: feeds/packages/admin/syslog-ng3/files/syslog-ng.conf === --- feeds/packages/admin/syslog-ng3/files/syslog-ng.conf

[OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: add vars for uci firewall include scripts

2010-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
hi jow, just a friendly reminder .. Thanks ede Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:37 +0100 From: edgar.sol...@web.de Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org To: OpenWrt

[OpenWrt-Devel] netfilter kernel module makefile description patch

2010-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
there seem to be some leftovers from https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6257 this patch fixes the descriptions of kmod package ipt-conntrack Thanks ede Index: package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk === ---

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backfire 10.03-beta

2010-03-04 Thread edgar . soldin
Highlights: * brcm-2.4 updated to 2.4.37 kernel why not recent 2.4.39, the 2.4 kernel doesn't have major changes anymore but some more bugfixes http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.9 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.8 when I tried it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backfire 10.03-beta

2010-03-04 Thread edgar . soldin
Kernel is already the latest, 2.4.37.9. http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03-beta/brcm-2.4/packages/kernel_2.4.37.9-1_brcm-2.4.ipk well done .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
Let's keep it simple and backward compatible. Change new config to ports but also add old port setting to this list. Something like: config_get ports ${section} Ports config_get port ${section} Port ports=$port $ports Perfect of course would be a log message telling deprecation of port setting

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eth1 not working in ubiquiti nanostation m

2010-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
When you have an old working trunk version you can try to narrow down the changeset that broke trunk. Check out revisions, compile, flash and test. Efficient is trying the circa middle between known broken and known working revision. When broken then raise known broken revision. When it's working

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
Don't missunderstand me please: I say switch to ports but don't break old configs by means of keeping port working in the background, maybe supported with a deprecation message for users with old config ;) .. ede On 28.02.2010 13:40, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: To me that's even more

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2mb flash not OpenWRT-Target?

2010-02-24 Thread edgar . soldin
Indeed. The only difference is that there is no predefined config for such small targets, so you have to manually select the part of busybox you want to strip, and similarly for the kernel config. You should be able to get pretty close to DD-WRT's config, while still benefitting from

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-20 Thread edgar . soldin
well, How about one big additional storage package then? Additionally enabling swapon and blkid from busybox? This also makes it easier to maintain. There is enough stuff already in base files. One or two packages is the solution we'll be going for, with swapon and blkid enabled in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] sudo: update to 1.7.2p3

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
(thanks for http://pastehtml.com/view/5tfitwd.html) Nice. Where does this come from? .. Is it dynamically updated? .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2mb flash not OpenWRT-Target?

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
On 19.02.2010 16:47, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote: The Asus WL520GC I just bought is running Linux. It has 2MB of flash. Wow, I assumed that out of the box, these devices with a small amount of flash did not run Linux. That was true in the past

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] add gesftpserver package

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
out of interest, whats the advance/difference to the openssh one? ... ede On 19.02.2010 16:02, Raphaël HUCK wrote: Hi, this patch adds geftpserver package. This server is taken from http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/sftpserver/index.html It will need the patch to add bzr support to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
This reads to me only as not primary target. Not as in we do not support that. The point is that no developer will care whether OpenWrt runs on 2MB flash and no efforts are made to make sure that the system remains usable with only 2MB - I think this qualifies as unsupported, it may work, if it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-18 Thread edgar . soldin
I'd rather keep them optional, that's why the log tells if it misses blkid. Actually it doesn't. And it's only automatically selected if the base block-mount package is selected, so it is optional, but you don't have to worry about individual dependencies, and things work as expected

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-18 Thread edgar . soldin
Lets start here OpenWrt does not currently run on devices which have 2MB or less of flash memory. This limitation will probably not be worked around since those devices are most of the time micro-routers, or Wireless Access Points, which are not the main OpenWrt target. This reads to me only

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-17 Thread edgar . soldin
On 12.02.2010 22:13, Daniel Dickinson wrote: I think the packaging needs the following properties: 1) scripts for functionality (e.g. uuid and label, using blkid) are automatically installed if the main block-mount (as I've called) is installed, and the dependency is satisfied (.e.g if

  1   2   >