Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-26 Thread obconseil
Hello again, Please comment on the attached patch commit if you are OK. Thanks Le 26/11/2014 08:10, John Crispin a écrit : Hi, so which patch do i use now ? John On 19/11/2014 13:24, Guillaume Déflache wrote: Hi all Sorry obconseil and John for the delay, my work priorities

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-25 Thread obconseil
a patch set to do that . I'll do that this morning. Obinou On 19/11/2014 13:24, Guillaume Déflache wrote: Hi all Sorry obconseil and John for the delay, my work priorities got shifted to other things... @John: good idea to ping me personally! ;) Am 06.11.2014 10:23, schrieb obconseil: Le 05

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-17 Thread obconseil
future so this should be fixed beforehand. John On 05/11/2014 22:43, Guillaume Déflache wrote: Am 05.11.2014 17:39, schrieb obconseil: Le 05/11/2014 16:41, Guillaume Déflache a écrit : [...] For others' to understand I should have made clear the library itself builds fine, only

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-06 Thread obconseil
Le 05/11/2014 22:43, Guillaume Déflache a écrit : Fine, but that's not the problem as I said before (see the very 1st quoted text in this message): *installing protoc at the right location* (that is .../build_dir/host/bin/protoc IIRC) is the problem. I checked that with our pre-BB snapshot

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-05 Thread obconseil
Hello, Le 05/11/2014 12:37, Guillaume Déflache a écrit : [As I am not sure Jacob and Obinou (the package's registered maintainer) are the same person (are they?), I am trying to CC to both too...] No we are not :-) We are actually trying migrating from a few-months-old trunk snapshot to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] protobuf broken in BB

2014-11-05 Thread obconseil
Le 05/11/2014 16:41, Guillaume Déflache a écrit : You were the fastest to respond so you indeed ought to stay the maintainer! ;) ;-) For others' to understand I should have made clear the library itself builds fine, only the host's `protoc` does not get installed. It would not help,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lantiq vdsl driver settings

2014-04-08 Thread obconseil
Hello, I would be interested by that too: I'm currently working on the same TD-W8970, using a annex-a ADSL2+ firmware. However, I lack VDSL2 annex-a firmware , as this standard has been recently allowed in France. I could confirm that , when using my current firmware on a VDSL2 POTS , the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lantiq vdsl driver settings

2014-04-08 Thread obconseil
Le 08/04/2014 20:05, José Vázquez a écrit : Make sure you have selected kmod-ltq-ptm-vr9 and kmod-ltq-atm-vr9 deselected in addition to a VR9 vdsl firmware. Thanks for the help. Is kmod-ltq-ptm-vr9 only for the packet transfer mode ? If yes it will not work - even on VDSL, ISP still use ATM

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lantiq vdsl driver settings

2014-04-08 Thread obconseil
Le 08/04/2014 20:05, José Vázquez a écrit : Make sure you have selected kmod-ltq-ptm-vr9 and kmod-ltq-atm-vr9 deselected in addition to a VR9 vdsl firmware. In France I think they sticked on the ATM mode even for VDSL. Is packet transfer mode mandatory for VDSL ? The firm you need should be

[OpenWrt-Devel] Boot OpenWRT on RB433 Lite versions (RB433L , RB433UAHL)

2014-01-08 Thread obconseil
Wojcuech , Thanks for your reply. Sorry I did not replied before, I did not get your message on my mailbox, dunno why... Generally net-boot works, console also works fine after small patch. See my posts: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=42410

[OpenWrt-Devel] Boot OpenWRT on RB433 Lite versions (RB433L , RB433UAHL)

2013-11-15 Thread obconseil
Hello, I'm currently struggling with two similar Microtik routers: RB433L , RB433UAHL. They are the Lite version of the well-known rb433, with a lower power consomption. Their amusing property is that the serial port seems present (RX/TX pads) but not initialized at boot, neither by Linux