Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC 4/6] x86: geode: shrink amount of default packages

2019-01-16 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
W dniu 16.01.2019 o 02:25, Philip Prindeville pisze: > Inline > >> On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote: >> >> Hi Philip >> >> W dniu 14.01.2019 o 21:10, Philip Prindeville pisze: >> >>> Why is the hwclock being dropped everywhere? >> >> It's provided by busybox and installed

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC 4/6] x86: geode: shrink amount of default packages

2019-01-15 Thread Philip Prindeville
Inline > On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote: > > Hi Philip > > W dniu 14.01.2019 o 21:10, Philip Prindeville pisze: > >> Why is the hwclock being dropped everywhere? > > It's provided by busybox and installed by default, also greping for its usage > in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC 4/6] x86: geode: shrink amount of default packages

2019-01-14 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
Hi Philip W dniu 14.01.2019 o 21:10, Philip Prindeville pisze: > Why is the hwclock being dropped everywhere? It's provided by busybox and installed by default, also greping for its usage in target/linux/x86/base-files returned nothing. Am I missing something, is the full fledged one used

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC 4/6] x86: geode: shrink amount of default packages

2019-01-14 Thread Philip Prindeville
Why is the hwclock being dropped everywhere? And who says the geos2, net5501, or alix2 are obsolete? I have some running right here… > On Jan 13, 2019, at 2:49 PM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote: > > Drop excesive amount of default packages, instead, rely on packages > specified in device

[OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC 4/6] x86: geode: shrink amount of default packages

2019-01-13 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
Drop excesive amount of default packages, instead, rely on packages specified in device definitions. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak --- target/linux/x86/geode/target.mk | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/x86/geode/target.mk