I found this old post in the OpenWrt-Devel mailing list
( https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html )
I also have a Buffalo WBMR-HP-G300H and I installed OpenWrt r35047
/ LuCI Trunk (trunk+svn9599) on it. This LuCI extension for viewing DSL
line parameters isn't
Hi,
back in January there was a discussion on how to integrate DSL
into Luci.
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html
A patch was presented which only got partially merged. The
dsl_control.sh is there, the integration into the web-ui seems
to be missing (AA
On 27/11/12 12:23, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
Hi,
back in January there was a discussion on how to integrate DSL
into Luci.
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html
A patch was presented which only got partially merged. The
dsl_control.sh is there, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why is there even a need for dedicated DSL control in the gui?
Shouldn't the normal per-interface ifup/ifdown be enough?
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined -
On 27/11/12 12:28, John Crispin wrote:
On 27/11/12 12:23, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
Hi,
back in January there was a discussion on how to integrate DSL
into Luci.
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html
A patch was presented which only got partially merged.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:51 PM, lee.es...@nowonline.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I've been using trunk on a Buffalo WBMR-HP-G300H ADSL router with great
success, so I've been looking at the existing DSL support and am keen to
help out getting it better integrated.
Could you explain or point me in the
Hi Andy,
I posted a brief summary on the openwrt 'General' forum earlier today ... it's
brief but will hopefully help. I've done 2 now, only bricked one (by
experimenting) and the serial cable makes it pretty easy to recover.
Cheers,
Lee.
On 25 Jan 2012, at 22:01, Andrew Lyon
Hello,
On 01/23/12 02:34, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 1/21/12 1:18 AM, Lee Essen wrote:
On 20 Jan 2012, at 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd sure like to see netlink being used to communicate speed/carrier changes up
into userspace.
Unfortunately there's absolutely no netlink
On 1/23/12 2:38 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
On 01/23/12 02:34, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 1/21/12 1:18 AM, Lee Essen wrote:
On 20 Jan 2012, at 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd sure like to see netlink being used to communicate speed/carrier
changes up into userspace.
There might be a miscommunication: I wasn't talking about rewriting the DSL
stack, but merely adding instrumentation to the existing drivers that would
message into user-space any line status changes.
-Philip
ideally using netlink and having a iw/ip/... like userland tool
we should
On 1/23/12 11:47 AM, John Crispin wrote:
There might be a miscommunication: I wasn't talking about rewriting the DSL
stack, but merely adding instrumentation to the existing drivers that would
message into user-space any line status changes.
-Philip
ideally using netlink and having a
Ok, with a bit of further investigation, netlink doesn't actually seem too
difficult … is there a process for registering new support (i.e. NETLINK_DSL)
or is there some other way to do this? Could something else be re-used?
I'm happy to have a go at a sample implementation, but I'm completely
On 1/21/12 1:18 AM, Lee Essen wrote:
On 20 Jan 2012, at 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd sure like to see netlink being used to communicate speed/carrier changes
up into userspace.
Unfortunately there's absolutely no netlink support in the lantiq driver and
I don't think any of
You probably want to go through 'netdev' (net...@vger.kernel.org) for changes
to Netlink.
On 1/22/12 10:35 AM, Lee Essen wrote:
Ok, with a bit of further investigation, netlink doesn't actually seem too
difficult … is there a process for registering new support (i.e. NETLINK_DSL)
or is
On 20 Jan 2012, at 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd sure like to see netlink being used to communicate speed/carrier changes
up into userspace.
Unfortunately there's absolutely no netlink support in the lantiq driver and I
don't think any of that info is available elsewhere, I would
On 21/01/12 09:18, Lee Essen wrote:
On 20 Jan 2012, at 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd sure like to see netlink being used to communicate speed/carrier changes
up into userspace.
Unfortunately there's absolutely no netlink support in the lantiq driver and
I don't think any of
I'd sure like to see netlink being used to communicate speed/carrier changes up
into userspace.
On 1/20/12 12:20 AM, Lee Essen wrote:
On 19 Jan 2012, at 22:17, John Crispin wrote:
Anyway ... just a few ideas, interested in thoughts, I can post the
current patches if there's interest,
Hi,
I've been using trunk on a Buffalo WBMR-HP-G300H ADSL router with great
success, so I've been looking at the existing DSL support and am keen to
help out getting it better integrated.
I'm conscious that there are likely to be a number of different DSL
devices needing support and have
Anyway ... just a few ideas, interested in thoughts, I can post the
current patches if there's interest, or happy to explore other ideas if
I'm way off the mark.
sure, show us your patch please ;)
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On 19 Jan 2012, at 22:17, John Crispin wrote:
Anyway ... just a few ideas, interested in thoughts, I can post the
current patches if there's interest, or happy to explore other ideas if
I'm way off the mark.
sure, show us your patch please ;)
20 matches
Mail list logo
