[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: hostapd: fix compilation of wpa_supplicant
Merged into my staging tree at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: Use autoclear for overlay loopbackdevice
Merged into project/fstools.git, branch master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/fstools.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: odhcpd: remove bogus IPKG_INSTROOT reference
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: umdns: fix unused error
Thanks for your quick reply. :) Should I update the umdns Makefile in the openwrt.git, too? On 05.04.20 10:00, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Merged. > Thank you! > > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: umdns: fix unused error
Merged. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ath79: improve mikrotik-caldata.sh
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: tegra: correct cpu subtype
W dniu 29.03.2020 o 22:30, Hauke Mehrtens pisze: > On 3/28/20 1:52 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote: >> Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at >> https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git >> >> ___ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > > I think we should backport both to 19.07, but this will result in a new > toolchain being created, is this ok? Yes, please backport, the current 19.07 images are broken. > > Hauke > > -- TMN ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: tegra: correct cpu subtype
On 3/28/20 1:52 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote: > Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at > https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > I think we should backport both to 19.07, but this will result in a new toolchain being created, is this ok? Hauke signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: tegra: correct cpu subtype
Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: session: deny access if password loginis disabled
Merged into project/rpcd.git, branch master at http://git.lede-project.org/?p=project/rpcd.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: buildbot: signall.sh store usign.key asusign.sec
Merged into buildbot.git, branch master at http://git.lede-project.org/?p=buildbot.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: fw3: robustify flow table detection.
Merged into project/firewall3.git, branch master at http://git.lede-project.org/?p=project/firewall3.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: cryptodev-linux: remove DEFAULT redefinition
Merged into my staging tree at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: scripts/gen-dependencies.sh: replacebackticks with $()
Merged into master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: scripts/gen-dependencies.sh: use /bin/sh
Merged into master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: libcxx: Build with the libsupc++ ABI
Merged into master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: libcxx: Add size optimizations
Merged into master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: openssl: update to version 1.0.2u
Merged into openwrt-18.06 at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: kernel: act_ctinfo: update backport
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900
Merged into openwrt-18.06. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: phase1: run prepare instead of diffconfig
Merged into buildbot.git, branch master. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: upslug2: Update to git repository
Merged into master. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: firewall3: Fix some format string problems
Merged into project/firewall3.git, branch master. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: rpcd: Switch to nanosleep
Merged into project/rpcd.git, branch master. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: libblkid-tiny: addsblkid_probe_set_utf8label support
Merged into project/fstools.git, branch master. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: libblkid-tiny: useblkid_probe_set_utf8label for label set
Merged into project/fstools.git, branch master. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: rb532: Fix missing DEVICE_TITLE
> On 9 Jul 2019, at 21:23, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Darbyshire-Bryant, Kevin [mailto:ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk] On >> Behalf Of Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant >> Sent: Dienstag, 9. Juli 2019 21:09 >> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> Cc: Adrian Schmutzler ; Kevin Darbyshire- >> Bryant >> Subject: Merged: rb532: Fix missing DEVICE_TITLE >> >> Merged into my staging tree. >> Thank you! > > Does this require backporting to 19.07? The warnings do not occur there > (seems to be interference with some other changes in master), but > DEVICE_TITLE is not set on 19.07 either. I don’t think so, or it doesn’t generate the warnings at least. I suspect related to one or more of 0096a1cf00 scripts/config: fix *c_shipped build depency tracking 75dcaf3d23 config: fix relational operators for bool and tristate symbols 972123f1e0 config: regenerate *_shipped sources Kevin signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: rb532: Fix missing DEVICE_TITLE
> -Original Message- > From: Darbyshire-Bryant, Kevin [mailto:ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk] On > Behalf Of Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > Sent: Dienstag, 9. Juli 2019 21:09 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: Adrian Schmutzler ; Kevin Darbyshire- > Bryant > Subject: Merged: rb532: Fix missing DEVICE_TITLE > > Merged into my staging tree. > Thank you! Does this require backporting to 19.07? The warnings do not occur there (seems to be interference with some other changes in master), but DEVICE_TITLE is not set on 19.07 either. Best Adrian openpgp-digital-signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: rb532: Fix missing DEVICE_TITLE
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: uboot-tegra: bump to 2019.04
___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ath79: glinet_gl-ar750s: Use QCA9887 firmware
___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ath79: fix OCEDO Raccoon 10Mbit PLL value
___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: add missing SPDX identifier for EX6150
Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: Increase GB-PC1 SPI frequency to 80MHz
Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: Increase GB-PC2 SPI frequency to 80MHz
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:16 AM Petr Štetiar wrote: > > Christian Lamparter [2019-03-25 21:43:26]: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at > > > https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1034614/#2088615 > > Ah, so this is actually v2, but not being marked as such. Thanks for the info. > > This patch simply got my attention as I was looking for some ramips candidates > I could include together in one build test, this patch was lingering in the > patchwork for more then a month without any comments, looked correct to me at > the first sight, and harmless enough so I've just merged it. I'll try to be > more careful next time. Erm careful with what? > > @Rosen could you please next time include v2 in the subject and changelog in > your patches? :-) Thanks > > Rosen Penev [2019-03-25 14:11:32]: > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:43 PM Christian Lamparter > > wrote: > > > > > > So, I think in order for this to "work as expected" the sysclock > > > in the mt7621.dtsi should be at 220 MHz (as in the upstream > > > drivers/staging/mt7621-dts/mt7621.dtsi) instead of 50 MHz. > > > > According to GCH, that commit is wrong: > > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1578#issuecomment-443661067 > > > > As far as the clock goes, it's using a PLL now: > > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621.dtsi#L223 > > Ok, thanks for the details. In order to move forward, could you please provide > relevant parts from dmesg (from clean latest snapshot, without your local > modifications) so we can see the clock information from the running GP-PC2 > system? > > I'll then include this additional details to the commit message as well, so it > could be easily git blamed. I'll see when I can get some time. > > > > That said, I don't think this will break anything since the mt7621-spi > > > driver > > > from 0043-spi-add-mt7621-support.patch, just limits it at the fake "25 > > > Mhz" > > > (which should be ~110 MHz). So, this will just look odd and makes no sense > > > at the first glance. > > > > Ah, none of my testing was done with the stock driver, only the upstream > > one. > > Honestly I find this little bit delicate, that you're submiting patches which > are not thoroughly tested against our master. To be clear, it's not happening > in this particular case, but I don't want to help merge patches which I'm not > able to test myself and which might in some rare cases brick other people's > devices. This device specifically is not that popular. Any potential fallout would be very minimal. Highly unlikely that there would be as there are already devices that use 80MHz and nobody has complained. > > So the commit message simply contains garbage, as nobody else could confirm > (and more likely deny) this dd values in the time of commit. > > We need to fix the commit message as well, please provide the dd values from > clean latest snapshot as well and please include kernel version for the > upstream kernel values as well (or if it was backport of upstream driver from > version XY to version AB). > > > There are also other devices with an 80MHz clock in the ramips dts > > directory. > > I find this arguments quite silly and I'm tired to read them over and over > again. It might be in the tree already for many reasons. > > > 80MHz looked like it was a peak so that's what I used. > > I'm wondering if it would hurt the performance if you would provide maximum > clock value as written in datasheet. I mean this testing is nice, but does it > provide some meaningful number? I think, that in order to make it a proper > number, you would still need to test it on a few more devices, ideally from > different production runs, and even after this we might still face > possibility, that we get another patch from the other user, claiming, that his > flash can do 121MHz so why it's crippled to 80MHz :-) I tried higher values than 80 but they resulted in no speedup. I think this is some mt7621 limitation. I've tested this on two devices with two different flash chips (PC1 and PC2 having Winbond and Spansion respectively). > > -- ynezz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: Increase GB-PC2 SPI frequency to 80MHz
Christian Lamparter [2019-03-25 21:43:26]: Hi, > > Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at > > https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1034614/#2088615 Ah, so this is actually v2, but not being marked as such. Thanks for the info. This patch simply got my attention as I was looking for some ramips candidates I could include together in one build test, this patch was lingering in the patchwork for more then a month without any comments, looked correct to me at the first sight, and harmless enough so I've just merged it. I'll try to be more careful next time. @Rosen could you please next time include v2 in the subject and changelog in your patches? :-) Thanks Rosen Penev [2019-03-25 14:11:32]: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:43 PM Christian Lamparter > wrote: > > > > So, I think in order for this to "work as expected" the sysclock > > in the mt7621.dtsi should be at 220 MHz (as in the upstream > > drivers/staging/mt7621-dts/mt7621.dtsi) instead of 50 MHz. > > According to GCH, that commit is wrong: > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1578#issuecomment-443661067 > > As far as the clock goes, it's using a PLL now: > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621.dtsi#L223 Ok, thanks for the details. In order to move forward, could you please provide relevant parts from dmesg (from clean latest snapshot, without your local modifications) so we can see the clock information from the running GP-PC2 system? I'll then include this additional details to the commit message as well, so it could be easily git blamed. > > That said, I don't think this will break anything since the mt7621-spi > > driver > > from 0043-spi-add-mt7621-support.patch, just limits it at the fake "25 Mhz" > > (which should be ~110 MHz). So, this will just look odd and makes no sense > > at the first glance. > > Ah, none of my testing was done with the stock driver, only the upstream one. Honestly I find this little bit delicate, that you're submiting patches which are not thoroughly tested against our master. To be clear, it's not happening in this particular case, but I don't want to help merge patches which I'm not able to test myself and which might in some rare cases brick other people's devices. So the commit message simply contains garbage, as nobody else could confirm (and more likely deny) this dd values in the time of commit. We need to fix the commit message as well, please provide the dd values from clean latest snapshot as well and please include kernel version for the upstream kernel values as well (or if it was backport of upstream driver from version XY to version AB). > There are also other devices with an 80MHz clock in the ramips dts directory. I find this arguments quite silly and I'm tired to read them over and over again. It might be in the tree already for many reasons. > 80MHz looked like it was a peak so that's what I used. I'm wondering if it would hurt the performance if you would provide maximum clock value as written in datasheet. I mean this testing is nice, but does it provide some meaningful number? I think, that in order to make it a proper number, you would still need to test it on a few more devices, ideally from different production runs, and even after this we might still face possibility, that we get another patch from the other user, claiming, that his flash can do 121MHz so why it's crippled to 80MHz :-) -- ynezz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: Increase GB-PC2 SPI frequency to 80MHz
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:43 PM Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Monday, March 25, 2019 2:16:04 PM CET Petr Štetiar wrote: > > Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at > > https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1034614/#2088615 > > So, I think in order for this to "work as expected" the sysclock > in the mt7621.dtsi should be at 220 MHz (as in the upstream > drivers/staging/mt7621-dts/mt7621.dtsi) instead of 50 MHz. According to GCH, that commit is wrong: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1578#issuecomment-443661067 As far as the clock goes, it's using a PLL now: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621.dtsi#L223 > > That said, I don't think this will break anything since the mt7621-spi driver > from 0043-spi-add-mt7621-support.patch, just limits it at the fake "25 Mhz" > (which should be ~110 MHz). So, this will just look odd and makes no sense > at the first glance. Ah, none of my testing was done with the stock driver, only the upstream one. There are also other devices with an 80MHz clock in the ramips dts directory. 80MHz looked like it was a peak so that's what I used. > > Cheers, > Christian > > ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: Increase GB-PC2 SPI frequency to 80MHz
On Monday, March 25, 2019 2:16:04 PM CET Petr Štetiar wrote: > Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at > https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1034614/#2088615 So, I think in order for this to "work as expected" the sysclock in the mt7621.dtsi should be at 220 MHz (as in the upstream drivers/staging/mt7621-dts/mt7621.dtsi) instead of 50 MHz. That said, I don't think this will break anything since the mt7621-spi driver from 0043-spi-add-mt7621-support.patch, just limits it at the fake "25 Mhz" (which should be ~110 MHz). So, this will just look odd and makes no sense at the first glance. Cheers, Christian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: Increase GB-PC2 SPI frequency to 80MHz
Thanks! Merged into my staging tree at https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/staging/ynezz.git ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ramips: fix D-Link DIR-615 H1 switch port mapping
Merged into my staging tree at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: mbedtls: update to 2.14.1 for 18.06
Merged into openwrt-18.06 at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: kernel: b53: register switch on probe
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: tools: tplink-safeloader: add C7v5 EU SupportList
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: ipq40xx: fix NBG6617 LED mapping
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: tools/xz: Add PKG_CPE_ID for proper CVE tracking
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: tools/libressl: Add PKG_CPE_ID for proper CVE tracking
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: patch: apply upstream cve fixes
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: kernel: re-enable MIPS VDSO
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: fstools: Install mount.hotplug and 10-fstab.defaults as 600
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: usbmode: Update modeswitch data to 20170806
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged:
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged:
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: lldpd: Install /etc/config file as 600
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged:
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged:
Merged into my staging tree. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: grub2: Fix CVE-2015-8370
Merged into master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: bzip2: Fix CVE-2016-3189
Merged into master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: Change the sigb buffer to be the same size as thefread
Merged into project/ucert.git, branch master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/ucert.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: uclient-http: Close ustream file handle only if allocated
Merged into project/uclient.git, branch master at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/uclient.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: x86: fix bios mkimage during efi image generation
The original work is about a year old now, I think. What do we still need to make it into master? Also, how did the target/host Makefile issue for sfdisk end up being resolved? Thanks, -Philip > On Mar 14, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > > Merged into my staging tree at > http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git. > > Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: x86: fix bios mkimage during efi image generation
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:18:10PM +0100, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Merged into my staging tree at > http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git. > > Thank you! > The next patch in series is not yet applied. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/881132/ My reason to simplify the image generation is as follows. 1. grub-bios-setup on ptgen-generated disk image is really unnecessary, since the resulting image will be converted to gpt later. No need for mbr boot sector here, since grub will use BIOS boot partition (EF02) instead of MBR when the performing grub-bios-install on the gpt disk image. Avoiding grub-bios-setup before gpt image has been generated saves several seconds on target/linux/install as well. Actually, grub-bios-install behaves the same to grub-bios-install-efi: setting up bios boot loader for legacy bios boot for both gpt and mbr disk. 2. There is no need to have 3 grub configurations. The previous fix for bios mkimage leaves grub-early.cfg inside /boot/grub. There is a cleanup performed on the next patch to remove grub-early.cfg, since it has been embedded inside grub-core.img. The grub-early.cfg should also be embedded for bootx64.efi, similar to how grub-early.cfg is embedded for bios core.img, so the resulting gpt image will have identical grub configuration for both bios and efi setup. With grub-early.cfg embedded inside bootx64.efi, the $(SIGNATURE).cfg is not needed anymore. grub.cfg is available and the content of $(SIGNATURE).cfg is identical to grub.cfg. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] Merged: x86: fix bios mkimage during efi image generation
Merged into my staging tree at http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git. Thank you! ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
