Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Old retired versions of 2.6.x soon to include x86?

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Markstaller
Well, start by editing target/linux/x86/alix2/target.mk ... Ok, I'll try this week and would be happy to do regular tests on Alix1D (and maybe 2D13, I have also some lying around..) Or to be more correct, a 2d13 is my homeoffice VDSL50-Router currently under Debian which is - well - not so

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Old retired versions of 2.6.x soon to include x86?

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Markstaller
Does anyone else find it troubling that x86 has been as stagnant as it is? +1 I'm just about changing some Alix.1D to OpenWRT What is required? maybe I can contribute (though admidettly I wouldn't know what to change to get 3.3.5 instead of 2.6.39 built for this platform :() Michael

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Old retired versions of 2.6.x soon to include x86?

2012-05-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 14:17 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: Gabor is retiring old versions of 2.6.x regularly (thanks, Gabor!). Alas, he's one step away from retiring 2.6.39.4 which is what x86 is currently at. Does anyone else find it troubling that x86 has been as stagnant as it is?

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Old retired versions of 2.6.x soon to include x86?

2012-05-13 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 5/13/12 7:44 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 14:17 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: Gabor is retiring old versions of 2.6.x regularly (thanks, Gabor!). Alas, he's one step away from retiring 2.6.39.4 which is what x86 is currently at. Does anyone else find it troubling

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Old retired versions of 2.6.x soon to include x86?

2012-05-13 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 5/13/12 3:12 PM, Michael Markstaller wrote: Does anyone else find it troubling that x86 has been as stagnant as it is? +1 I'm just about changing some Alix.1D to OpenWRT What is required? maybe I can contribute (though admidettly I wouldn't know what to change to get 3.3.5 instead of

[OpenWrt-Devel] Old retired versions of 2.6.x soon to include x86?

2012-05-12 Thread Philip Prindeville
Gabor is retiring old versions of 2.6.x regularly (thanks, Gabor!). Alas, he's one step away from retiring 2.6.39.4 which is what x86 is currently at. Does anyone else find it troubling that x86 has been as stagnant as it is? I use about 7 different Geode/x86-based boxes for infrastructure