On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:20:56AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:12:00AM +, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
[...]
> > This is v2 of the patch with a more correct description what is does.
> >
> > Ref: https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details_id=4085
> > Suggested-by:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:12:00AM +, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> introduced with 44f694ba1bca1417d24e851c637c284f9f78c06d
> ("build: select procd-ujail if !SMALL_FLASH") dnsmasq fails
> to startup when the leasefile is configured to be in /tmp,
> which is just not suited for beeing a jail
introduced with 44f694ba1bca1417d24e851c637c284f9f78c06d
("build: select procd-ujail if !SMALL_FLASH") dnsmasq fails
to startup when the leasefile is configured to be in /tmp,
which is just not suited for beeing a jail location.
With this patch we explicit call jail_mount_rw() for the
(now
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > + "because jailing /tmp does not work: choose
> > e.g. /tmp/dnsmasq/leasefile"
> > + }
> To do what you describe in the commit message it would be
> } else {
>
> I'm fine with either, just the
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 03:42:18PM +, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> introduced with 44f694ba1bca1417d24e851c637c284f9f78c06d
> ("build: select procd-ujail if !SMALL_FLASH") dnsmasq fails
> to startup when the leasefile is configured to be in /tmp,
> which is just not suited for beeing a jail
introduced with 44f694ba1bca1417d24e851c637c284f9f78c06d
("build: select procd-ujail if !SMALL_FLASH") dnsmasq fails
to startup when the leasefile is configured to be in /tmp,
which is just not suited for beeing a jail location.
Workaround this (no jailing for this file for this special case)
and
