> For me, putting void * pointers everywhere is an anti-pattern which I
> discourage with the way the ubus api is set up. It is a lazy way to
> avoid making the code more type safe, and it adds a bit of unnecessary
> bloat to data structures.
Void pointer has one advantage i.e. it is portable and
On 2021-02-04 18:25, Wojciech Jowsa wrote:
> czw., 4 lut 2021 o 10:32 Felix Fietkau napisał(a):
>>
>>
>> On 2021-02-03 20:02, Wojciech Jowsa wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to write a libubus wrapper in C++. When looking into
>> > ubus_method and ubus_handler_t structures I don't see a
czw., 4 lut 2021 o 10:32 Felix Fietkau napisał(a):
>
>
> On 2021-02-03 20:02, Wojciech Jowsa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to write a libubus wrapper in C++. When looking into
> > ubus_method and ubus_handler_t structures I don't see a place where I
> > could pass a this pointer. It makes
On 2021-02-03 20:02, Wojciech Jowsa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to write a libubus wrapper in C++. When looking into
> ubus_method and ubus_handler_t structures I don't see a place where I
> could pass a this pointer. It makes the handling of ubus calls in C++
> a bit complicated.
> The
Hi,
I would like to write a libubus wrapper in C++. When looking into
ubus_method and ubus_handler_t structures I don't see a place where I
could pass a this pointer. It makes the handling of ubus calls in C++
a bit complicated.
The solution to that case would be adding a void pointer to the
