> Having all this features diabled gives for the kernel of a Nanostation M XM
> ubnt_nanostation-m-kernel.bin:
> - ath79-generic: 1792151
> - ath79-tiny: 1500108
> vmlinux:
> - ath79-generic: 5588220
> - ath79-tiny: 4687644
>
> So a bit more than 16% smaller size, or 900k absolute. A
> I agree, that some of the "small_flash" defaults are probably not the optimal
> choice for 8MB-flash devices.
> A new subtarget might be an option, but is it really worth to define a new
> one for "deprecated" boards? Esp. as it's to be expected that both will vanish
> in the release following
Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2020, 11:03:56 CET schrieb Baptiste Jonglez:
> Hi,
>
> On 06-12-20, Sven Roederer wrote:
> > Currently 8MB flash / 32MB RAM devices are fully supported in OpenWrt, as
> > they work quite well for basic usage (including full LuCI).
> > On some projects with advanced
Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2020, 13:59:52 CET schrieb Adrian Schmutzler:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> > On Behalf Of Sven Roederer
> > Sent: Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2020 02:07
> > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Sven Roederer
> Sent: Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2020 02:07
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [RFC 0/5] ath79: add a lower RAM-using version of 8/32 devices
>
> Currently
Hi,
On 06-12-20, Sven Roederer wrote:
> Currently 8MB flash / 32MB RAM devices are fully supported in OpenWrt, as they
> work quite well for basic usage (including full LuCI).
> On some projects with advanced features (e.g. Freifunk) the lack of RAM turns
> them into unstable devices. Mostly
