Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2.6 kernel and b43 driver

2008-06-29 Thread Steve Brown
Steve Brown wrote: Peter Denison wrote: Rather than saying current svn, it would really help if you can state the exact revision you're using. To summarise the reports at #3510 and here, b43 seems to work on r10154, but not on r11363, r11372 or r11579. Unfortunately, I don't have a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] smc7908-isp (infineon danube based router)

2008-06-29 Thread John Crispin
this board is an arcaydian design. we managed to boot openwrt on it last night. pci, net, gpi,led, button, wdt,... are working. voipd and dsl are still missing. for the bootloader you need to use u-boot. the u-boot source is in trunk. we have not tried to boot it yet on the device, but are

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2.6 kernel and b43 driver

2008-06-29 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 29 June 2008 15:12:47 Steve Brown wrote: What should I do next? Can you try this patch? Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c === --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2.6 kernel and b43 driver

2008-06-29 Thread Steve Brown
Michael Buesch wrote: On Sunday 29 June 2008 15:12:47 Steve Brown wrote: What should I do next? Can you try this patch? Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c === ---

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2.6 kernel and b43 driver

2008-06-29 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 29 June 2008 21:04:28 Steve Brown wrote: Michael Buesch wrote: On Sunday 29 June 2008 15:12:47 Steve Brown wrote: What should I do next? Can you try this patch? Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] smc7908-isp (infineon danube based router)

2008-06-29 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit: En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit: I cannot really read german, and much less 40 pages of it ;-) but the only way to know for sure is to open it and/or get a bootlog (arcadyan makes many models, e.g. the speedport w700v is based on the amazon chipset). I found

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH]

2008-06-29 Thread RB
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a bunch of small patches I have and figure that some of that should probably be integrated upstream: It's not as simple for the submitter, but since each of these are so functionally discrete it really would be