Hi,
>Typically, frequency can be raised with substantial gains in read speed.
I can increase if required.
Not sure how fast is reasonable/required?
At this stage I would rather not set up an oscilloscope
to experiment with how fast I can push it?
Datasheet of flash ic is 80MHz or so?
Not sure
why its required to have that part under /etc/config/znc config znc
list listener 192.168.1.1 1234 while i
want to use external znc_config_path ? Next, znc --makeconf is generating
in different way password comparing to znc -makepass which is causing problem
under
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:20 PM mans0n wrote:
> Busybox hdparm is about 8k and full hdparm is about 93k. I think most
> NAS devices can manage that space, so I agree with Matthias.
> But the problem is that full hdparm is in the package feed, so it
> shouldn't be included in DEFAULT_PACKAGES
For this second patchset, I have focussed on the patches that "fix"
actual problems, and thus dropped the former 3/3 which is a conceptual
change needing further discussion/improvements.
The remainder should be fine to be merged relatively quickly.
While patches 1 and 2 are effectively
Since DEVICE_TYPE cannot be set per device, just set DEVICE_TYPE
to "nas" for the entire subtarget, which only contains this single
device.
Note that while this looks like a cosmetic change in combination
with the previous patches, this particular patch actually changes
the packages for the
While the effective "default" based on frequent use is "router", the
DEVICE_TYPE variable actually provides a "basic" configuration without
selecting any additional packages.
This is currently set up with the identifier "bootloader", which seems
to be not used at all. However, the only targets
DEVICE_TYPE is a target/subtarget variable, and it does not have
any effect when set in a device definition. It can only be set
in a target's or subtarget's Makefile.
Consequently, having it set anyway is misleading, so this drops
all cases.
This effectively reverts the following commits:
Hi Adrian, Matthias,
I was preparing my own patch for converting DEVICE_TYPE to a
device-specific variable.
https://github.com/mans0n/openwrt/commit/4d41dd963ae8d595ef38ea0a38ea08abdac1415d
But I stumbled on some blockers so I left it behind...
One of the blockers was the busybox hdparm.
I'd
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:39 PM wrote:
> sorry for intruding into this subject, but this has annoyed me for a long
> time already.
I am very happy that you are taking up the subject :D
> I've just sent a small patchset to tidy up the existing situation.
Excellent, will look.
> As you stated
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:12 PM Matthias Schiffer
wrote:
> Meanwhile I've found another target-specific config setting in the busybox
> package: BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_TRUNCATE is enabled for TARGET_bcm53xx only.
>
> I assume "truncate" is tiny enough that it doesn't really justify making
> busybox
They are not used at all.
Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang
---
target/linux/ipq40xx/config-4.19 | 5 -
target/linux/ipq40xx/config-5.4 | 6 --
2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ipq40xx/config-4.19 b/target/linux/ipq40xx/config-4.19
index 23eb5ca589..7cea66e50d
On 5/30/20 12:20 PM, mans0n wrote:
> Hi Adrian, Matthias,
>
> I was preparing my own patch for converting DEVICE_TYPE to a
> device-specific variable.
> https://github.com/mans0n/openwrt/commit/4d41dd963ae8d595ef38ea0a38ea08abdac1415d
>
> But I stumbled on some blockers so I left it behind...
>
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of mans0n
> Sent: Samstag, 30. Mai 2020 12:20
> To: 'Matthias Schiffer' ;
> m...@adrianschmutzler.de
> Cc: 'Linus Walleij' ; openwrt-
> de...@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthias Schiffer
> Sent: Samstag, 30. Mai 2020 16:45
> To: mans0n
> Cc: 'Linus Walleij' ; openwrt-
> de...@lists.openwrt.org; m...@adrianschmutzler.de
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel]
On 5/31/20 12:06 AM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
>> On Behalf Of mans0n
>> Sent: Samstag, 30. Mai 2020 12:20
>> To: 'Matthias Schiffer' ;
>> m...@adrianschmutzler.de
>> Cc: 'Linus Walleij' ;
15 matches
Mail list logo
