On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, at 21:13, John Thomson wrote:
> -@@ -213,6 +262,24 @@ static int part_erase(struct mtd_info *m
> if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
> instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
I should modify this to avoid the _write, if the _erase fails before the
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:35 PM John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 06.08.20 14:31, Andre Valentin wrote:
> > Hi Jaap,
> >
> >
> > Am 06.08.20 um 13:43 schrieb Jaap Buurman:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have noticed the flow control work for mt7621 in the following
> >> Openwrt patch:
> >>
Merged into my staging tree at
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git.
Thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi there,
I'd like to use signature verification during sysupgrade, but at the moment I
get "Image check failed" message.
Similar to what guys mentioned here:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/possible-bug-in-ucert/57704
By digging around, I found out that:
fwtool -q -T -s /dev/null
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of m...@adrianschmutzler.de
> Sent: Dienstag, 4. August 2020 16:43
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Fate of 4.14 targets
>
> Hi together,
>
> with bcm47xx/bcm53xx
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
---
vlan.c | 64 ++
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
diff --git a/vlan.c b/vlan.c
index 6270d95d755d..7d37fef33e2f 100644
--- a/vlan.c
+++ b/vlan.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include "netifd.h"
#include "system.h"
Only used for 802.1q devices
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
---
vlandev.c | 66 +++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff --git a/vlandev.c b/vlandev.c
index 10b78e241576..7efb5f42b5c4 100644
--- a/vlandev.c
+++ b/vlandev.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
---
bridge.c| 105 +++-
config.c| 1 +
device.h| 4 +-
interface.c | 10 +++--
interface.h | 2 +-
ubus.c | 5 ++-
wireless.c | 4 +-
7 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:47:57PM +0300, Andrii Voloshyn wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to use signature verification during sysupgrade, but at the moment I
> get "Image check failed" message.
> Similar to what guys mentioned here:
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/possible-bug-in-ucert/57704
>
Hauke Mehrtens [2020-08-06 23:48:55]:
Hi,
> On 7/28/20 10:14 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> > Refreshed patches and config options. Removed upstreamed patches:
> >
> > 001-remove-stime-function-calls.patch
> > 110-no_static_libgcc.patch
> >
> > Run tested on x86_64 under QEMU.
> >
> >
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:09 AM Kristian Evensen
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jaap Buurman wrote:
> > However, on this mailing list a user by the name of Kristian claims
> > that disabling flow control helps fix this problem, as can be read
> > here:
> >
From: Petr Štetiar
In order to support SAE/WPA3-Personal in default images. Replaced almost
all occurencies of wpad-basic and wpad-mini with wpad-basic-wolfssl for
consistency. Keeping out ar71xx from the list in order to make the
backports easier.
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar
[rebase]
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jaap Buurman wrote:
> However, on this mailing list a user by the name of Kristian claims
> that disabling flow control helps fix this problem, as can be read
> here:
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2017-November/009882.html
My patch
Most targets have been updated to consistently use the vendor_model
scheme for device definitions and thus, image names.
Apply this to bcm47xx as well. This does _not_ apply any other
specific naming changes.
Cc: Rafał Miłecki
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
On 07/08/2020 09:47, Andrii Voloshyn wrote:
I'd like to use signature verification during sysupgrade, but at the moment I get
"Image check failed" message.
Similar to what guys mentioned here:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/possible-bug-in-ucert/57704
Keep in mind that, for security purposes,
Dear community,
in the past couple of months I've been working on implementing the
Open Container Initiative Runtime Specification [1] in procd by
extending the already existing support for slim containers ('ujail').
As a result, there is now a new CLI tool called 'uxc' which handles
the basic
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:02 PM Rosen Penev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:49 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Masafumi UTSUGI
> >
> > SYS_settimeofday syscall is not time64 safe.
> > Using settimeofday() instead of syscall() is recommended or
> > some C libraries such as musl might cause compile
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:11 AM Etienne Champetier
wrote:
>
> Hi Rosen,
>
> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
> >
> > Recently there's been a pull request to get patented functionality in
> > the packages feed: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12992
> >
> > Which pointed
The `ipkg-build` script converts a folder into a `opkg` installable
package. Until now it would use root:root for all packages and try to
preserve file modes.
This has the two drawbacks of packages want to add non-root files or add
SUID files, like the `sudo` package does.
To give more
From: Thomas Petazzoni
SELinux support requires setting the appropriate SELinux security context
to files and directories, which needs to happen at build time in order
to support read-only root filesystem scenarios. In order to create these
security contexts, we will have to run some
Instead of INSTALL_SUID the PKG_FILE_MODES variable should be used
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren
---
rules.mk | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules.mk b/rules.mk
index 45d96d6be4..d535e57266 100644
--- a/rules.mk
+++ b/rules.mk
@@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ PATCH:=patch
PYTHON:=python
Instead of using INSTALL_SUID use the more flexible PKG_FILE_MODES
variable withn the Makefile to set the SUID bit.
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren
---
package/utils/busybox/Makefile | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/utils/busybox/Makefile
Hi team,
currently exist two different ideas on when to raise the PKG_RELEASE of
a package.
* When functional things change
For example, a OpenWrt specific patch is added
* When anything inside the packages ipk file changes
Includes patch and so called "cosmetic" changes outside the
On 07.08.20 16:48, Rosen Penev wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:42 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
On 07.08.20 14:18, Rosen Penev wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:57 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
Fix shellcheck SC2230
which is non-standard. Use builtin 'command -v' instead.
Once applied to everything
On 07.08.20 09:47, Daniel Golle wrote:
Dear community,
in the past couple of months I've been working on implementing the
Open Container Initiative Runtime Specification [1] in procd by
extending the already existing support for slim containers ('ujail').
As a result, there is now a new CLI
Fix shellcheck SC2230
> which is non-standard. Use builtin 'command -v' instead.
Once applied to everything concerning OpenWrt we can disable the busybox
feature `which` and save 3.8kB.
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren
---
include/rootfs.mk| 6 +++---
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:57 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
>
> Fix shellcheck SC2230
> > which is non-standard. Use builtin 'command -v' instead.
>
> Once applied to everything concerning OpenWrt we can disable the busybox
> feature `which` and save 3.8kB.
which and command -v seem to not be the same.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:42 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
>
>
> On 07.08.20 14:18, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:57 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
> >> Fix shellcheck SC2230
> >>> which is non-standard. Use builtin 'command -v' instead.
> >> Once applied to everything concerning OpenWrt we
On 07.08.20 14:18, Rosen Penev wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:57 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
Fix shellcheck SC2230
which is non-standard. Use builtin 'command -v' instead.
Once applied to everything concerning OpenWrt we can disable the busybox
feature `which` and save 3.8kB.
which and
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:24 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
>
>
> On 07.08.20 16:48, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:42 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07.08.20 14:18, Rosen Penev wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:57 PM Paul Spooren wrote:
> Fix shellcheck SC2230
> >
30 matches
Mail list logo
