printed here seems to be
corrupted.
--
Kalle Valo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com writes:
On Saturday 18 January 2014 01:14:28 Kalle Valo wrote:
Just as general information to the state of ath10k, my current test showed
some problems with it:
* Samsung GT-I9300 only got horrible slow connections to an QCA9880 but
an Intel
was wrong with my answer?
--
Kalle Valo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
).
--
Kalle Valo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
should be working since 4 addresses has fixed by Michal:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2014-February/001191.html
But the version of ath10k in openwrt is starting to become old, I doubt
it has Michal's fix.
--
Kalle Valo
___
openwrt-devel
firmware essentially the same?
>
> They should at least be quite similar. Maybe Kalle knows more about
> it.
I don't know what firmware QSDK has and if it's tested with ath10k. My
recommendation is to take ath10k firmware images from linux-f
(please don't top post)
Sebastian Gottschall writes:
> this code is not in use in its original form for ipq4019. i have seen
> that his patch is also dropped from ath.git but is still in use by
> openwrt. could somone clarify the state here and why it was dropped?
I dropped the patch because
Baptiste Jonglez writes:
> Hi,
>
> Cross-posting to openwrt-devel because we are backporting the necessary fixes.
>
> On 12-08-20, Jouni Malinen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:17:47AM +0200, Toke H?iland-J?rgensen wrote:
>> > Pali Roh?r writes:
>> > > Could somebody react and provide some
Sven Eckelmann writes:
> On Monday, 25 May 2020 11:22:13 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
>> And it still can with this OpenWrt version. But it doesn't seem to happen
>> with
>> the most recent OpenWrt reboot-13353-gb1604b744b. But there are nearly 4000
>> commits inbetween. So no idea what
Robert Marko writes:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
>> > understanding that there should be upd
Robert Marko writes:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>>
>> Robert Marko writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
&g
Kalle Valo writes:
> + ath11k, jeff
>
> Sven Eckelmann writes:
>
>> On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
>>> > shared with OEMs".
&
+ ath11k, jeff
Sven Eckelmann writes:
> On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote:
> [...]
>>> The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
>> > shared with OEMs".
>> >
>> > Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is there an established
>> > procedure
13 matches
Mail list logo
