[OpenWrt-Devel] Netgear R6300 - 802.11ac device

. Anybody knows if this is as open as WNDR3800 to allow openwrt and ... open the pandora's box with new and exciting issues with gigabit wireless? ;-) Please CC, I'm not on the list. Regards, Maciej Soltysiak ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Netgear R6300 - 802.11ac device

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/7/3 Maciej Soltysiak mac...@soltysiak.com: Netgear has recently released a 802.11ac device dubbed R6300 with 128 MB Flash and 128 MB RAM. I guess my work on creating images for WNDR4500 will help here. I'm

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] is anybody working on supporting Linksys WRT1900ac ?

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Aaron Z aar...@pls-net.org wrote: Perhaps marketing is watching this thread? It now reads: Open Source is a vehicle for other communities, such as DD-WRT, Open WRT, and Tomato, to create their own custom versions of open source firmware for the product.

[OpenWrt-Devel] uhttpd - bugs vs oficial repo

: Response Header indicated 2.400 bytes, but server sent 2412 bytes. == Question == I'd like to see if I can fix the bug, but I don't know where is the official repo for uhttp. Does anyone know? Best regards, Maciej Soltysiak ___ openwrt-devel mailing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uhttpd - bugs vs oficial repo

Hi Yousong, Martin, On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Yousong Zhou yszhou4t...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure about the above issues reported. As for the repos' URL, you can find them at http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi - It's uhttpd on OpenWrt AA release and before. - It's uhttpd2 on OpenWrt BB and

[OpenWrt-Devel] config for WNDR3800

Hi, I was planning to try and build openwrt on my box. Is there an official .config file that's used when building the snapshots? I'm looking for .config for Netgear WNDR3800. Best regards, Maciej ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] config for WNDR3800

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: Instead of using a premade .config, you'll want to use make menuconfig. Under Target profile, you'll find the netgear WNDR3800. Right, I just wanted to start off with the same set of packages built in as the trunk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] config for WNDR3800

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Lars la...@systemli.org wrote: hey, this is the dotconfig used for the snapshots: https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/generic/config you only have to select the target, otherwise it'll build images for all ar71xx targets. Why didn't I see

[OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrade from CC RC2 to RC3

Hi guys, Would s/rc2/rc3/ on the opkg.conf lead to a clean upgrade or is it better to reflash? Best regards, Maciej ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Upgrade from CC RC2 to RC3

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:22 AM, John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org wrote: On 20/07/2015 22:38, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2015-07-20 18:49, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: Hi guys, Would s/rc2/rc3/ on the opkg.conf lead to a clean upgrade or is it better to reflash? Upgrading via opkg doesn't

[OpenWrt-Devel] Tried LEDE with SQM today

Hi, I gave LEDE a whirl on WNDR3800 on a 100 Mb DSL line. Without SQM, speedtest.net gave around 90 Mbit/s of download and 3,6 upload. I installed sqm-scripts and the luci app and enabled SQM on eth1, set ingress and egress shaping to 90% of speedtest.net results, enabled fq_codel and simple.qos

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

ner a bit. Best regards, Maciej On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <mac...@soltysiak.com> wrote: > The OpenWrt Makefile aims to get dnscrypt-proxy 1.9.5 from a mirror at > https://github.com/dyne/dnscrypt-proxy > > However, the upstream (Frank Denis) recently

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

The OpenWrt Makefile aims to get dnscrypt-proxy 1.9.5 from a mirror at https://github.com/dyne/dnscrypt-proxy However, the upstream (Frank Denis) recently released a 2.0 which is significantly different. It's now written in go, instead of C and it support the new version of the protocol (v2). If

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

Hi John, As a user of an ar71xx (WNDR3800) on OpenWrt, I'd like to ask if your desire is that ar71xx never gets bumped up to anything higher than 4.9 or it's just not 4.14 because of some specific reasons related to 4.14? IOW, shall I be looking for a replacement because I'll stay on 4.9

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel version status

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:41 PM, John Crispin wrote: > please dont top post. Apologies! Thank you for the kind reminder. > ath79 is the same as ar71xx but uses dts files instead of mach files Right, does that mean there might be an ath79 target, which is not ready yet, or am I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnscrypt-proxy package missing in snapshot

very much appreciate for helping do this, Maciej On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > On my MIPS32 (WNDR3800) system, I noticed the C binary was <100k. > The GO binary is 6.5MB, I ran upx on it and it went down to 1.5M. > It incurs about 1s of delay f