match: Response Header indicated 2.400 bytes, but
server sent 2412 bytes.
== Question ==
I'd like to see if I can fix the bug, but I don't know where is the
official repo for uhttp. Does anyone know?
Best regards,
Maciej Soltysiak
___
openwr
Hi Yousong, Martin,
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> Not sure about the above issues reported. As for the repos' URL, you
> can find them at http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi
>
> - It's uhttpd on OpenWrt AA release and before.
> - It's uhttpd2 on OpenWrt BB and later.
>
>
Hi List,
Sorry if it's something obvious which I missed, but is there a way to
permanently add an options line to resolv.conf?
Best regards,
Maciej
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
Hi,
I was planning to try and build openwrt on my box. Is there an official
.config file that's used when building the snapshots?
I'm looking for .config for Netgear WNDR3800.
Best regards,
Maciej
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.open
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Lars wrote:
> hey,
>
> this is the dotconfig used for the snapshots:
> https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/generic/config
>
> you only have to select the target, otherwise it'll build images for all
> ar71xx targets.
>
Why didn't I see it, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Jonathan Bennett
wrote:
> Instead of using a premade .config, you'll want to use "make menuconfig."
> Under Target profile, you'll find the netgear WNDR3800.
>
> Right, I just wanted to start off with the same set of packages built in
as the trunk images.
Thanks,
Hi guys,
Would s/rc2/rc3/ on the opkg.conf lead to a clean upgrade or is it better
to reflash?
Best regards,
Maciej
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:22 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 20/07/2015 22:38, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > On 2015-07-20 18:49, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Would s/rc2/rc3/ on the opkg.conf lead to a clean upgrade or is it
> >>
I'd very much appreciate for helping do this,
Maciej
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Maciej Soltysiak
wrote:
> On my MIPS32 (WNDR3800) system, I noticed the C binary was <100k.
> The GO binary is 6.5MB, I ran upx on it and it went down to 1.5M.
> It incurs about 1s of delay
Hi,
I gave LEDE a whirl on WNDR3800 on a 100 Mb DSL line.
Without SQM, speedtest.net gave around 90 Mbit/s of download and 3,6 upload.
I installed sqm-scripts and the luci app and enabled SQM on eth1, set
ingress and egress shaping to 90% of speedtest.net results, enabled
fq_codel and simple.qos
e:
> kmod-sched-cake is needed
>
> tc -s qdisc show your_device would probably show absence or badness.
>
> I do not think that hardware is capable of 90mbits of inbound shaping
> either.
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Maciej Soltysiak
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
The OpenWrt Makefile aims to get dnscrypt-proxy 1.9.5 from a mirror at
https://github.com/dyne/dnscrypt-proxy
However, the upstream (Frank Denis) recently released a 2.0 which is
significantly different.
It's now written in go, instead of C and it support the new version of the
protocol (v2).
If
tainer a bit.
Best regards,
Maciej
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Maciej Soltysiak
wrote:
> The OpenWrt Makefile aims to get dnscrypt-proxy 1.9.5 from a mirror at
> https://github.com/dyne/dnscrypt-proxy
>
> However, the upstream (Frank Denis) recently released a 2.0 whic
Hi John,
As a user of an ar71xx (WNDR3800) on OpenWrt, I'd like to ask if your
desire is that ar71xx never gets bumped up to anything higher than 4.9 or
it's just not 4.14 because of some specific reasons related to 4.14?
IOW, shall I be looking for a replacement because I'll stay on 4.9 forever?
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:41 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> please dont top post.
Apologies! Thank you for the kind reminder.
> ath79 is the same as ar71xx but uses dts files instead of mach files
Right, does that mean there might be an ath79 target, which is not
ready yet, or am I confusing things?
.
Anybody knows if this is as open as WNDR3800 to allow openwrt and ... open
the pandora's box with new and exciting issues with gigabit wireless? ;-)
Please CC, I'm not on the list.
Regards,
Maciej Soltysiak
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
ope
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> 2012/7/3 Maciej Soltysiak :
> > Netgear has recently released a 802.11ac device dubbed R6300 with 128 MB
> > Flash and 128 MB RAM.
>
> I guess my work on creating images for WNDR4500 will help here. I'm on
&
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Aaron Z wrote:
> Perhaps marketing is watching this thread? It now reads:
> "Open Source is a vehicle for other communities, such as DD-WRT, Open WRT,
> and Tomato, to create their own custom versions of open source firmware for
> the product. OpenWRT developers
18 matches
Mail list logo
