On 2016-12-05 11:57, Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Felix,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:51:30PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2016-12-01 16:38, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> > I was
Hi Felix,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:51:30PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-12-01 16:38, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >> On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >> > I was following your posts and do believe
Hi Arturo,
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:58:17AM +0100, Arturo Rinaldi wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> as Kathy mentioned as first answer to Daniel, a proper setup running GNUnet
> on our boards could give us a boost in the IoT world. During the last years
I'm pretty sure we are practically at this
Hello folks,
as Kathy mentioned as first answer to Daniel, a proper setup running GNUnet
on our boards could give us a boost in the IoT world. During the last years
we have developed a new approach to the arduino "bridge" interaction with
CIAO :
On 2016-12-01 16:38, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> > I was following your posts and do believe there is quite some overlap.
>> > It would thus be feasible to generalize the common
Hi Felix,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Sukru,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:52:57PM +, Sukru Senli wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Regarding (Phase 2 - ubus rpc proxy), I had opened a thread in
