On 11/2/2017 1:44 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
I agree, that there were no warning signs on the public mailing list.
As I said before, all history now; discussing it further serves no purpose.
- Mike
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Mike Baker wrote on 02.11.2017 16:59:
On 11/1/2017 5:18 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
This raises some more questions: which terms and conditions did people
have
to approve to get an @openwrt.org address? Where can these terms and
conditions be found? Is every email sent from such an address
On 11/1/2017 5:18 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
This raises some more questions: which terms and conditions did people
have
to approve to get an @openwrt.org address? Where can these terms and
conditions be found? Is every email sent from such an address supposed to
be discussed and approved by
On 10/26/2017 09:05 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Hannu Nyman writes:
>
>> Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
>>> + -
>>> + * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
>>> + * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall
Philip Prindeville wrote on 28.10.2017 23:20:
Hi all,
Does it seem to anyone else that we’re making this more complicated than it
needs to be?
If one of the goals we’re going for from here on out is “equality”, then a
basic litmus test to be applied to any action might be “does this get us
Hi all,
Does it seem to anyone else that we’re making this more complicated than it
needs to be?
If one of the goals we’re going for from here on out is “equality”, then a
basic litmus test to be applied to any action might be “does this get us closer
to a level playing field, or further
Dear Florian,
Seems the discussion that was raised on using a personal openwrt address in a
SOB does not do much good so far and it is certainly not my intention to go
against rule #12; I would be sorry if I did. The question I raised is, although
about personal addresses, absolutely not aimed
On 10/27/2017 02:34 AM, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
> Dear Imre,
>
> On the info for the version of the patch: my error, must have overlooked the
> included version info, it is indeed included.
>
> About the use of openwrt email addresses in the SOB:
> This has been discussed before, and the
On 27 October 2017 at 00:32, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2017-10-26 18:16, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
>
> Please, could you add some info on what has changed with the new version of
> the patch ?
> And, it would be appreciated when the SOB would not use an openwrt.org
Hannu Nyman wrote:
> Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
> > + -
> > + * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
> > + * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
> > + * 2 oz. Grapefruit
Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 26.10.2017 klo 18:41:
+ -
+ * 2 oz. Orange Juice Combine all juices in a
+ * 2 oz. Pineapple Juice tall glass filled with
+ * 2 oz. Grapefruit Juice ice, stir well.
+ * 2 oz. Cranberry Juice
+
Hi Paul,
On 2017-10-26 18:16, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
Please, could you add some info on what has changed with the new version of the
patch ?
And, it would be appreciated when the SOB would not use an openwrt.org mail
address (assuming Imre has another suitable mail available).
Paul
Op 26
12 matches
Mail list logo