>> if I haven't overlooked it, the patch does not provide a "factory" Image as
>> in ar71xx, at least according to "Flashing instructions".
> if I parse this correctly, then my answer is, that I simply didn't included
> instructions for flashing of factory image as it wasn't possible at that time,
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 21:34:53]:
> Can I add Tested-By tag to my patch? :)
Tested-by: Petr Štetiar (tested on ar71xx/ath79 with
bullet-m-xw)
-- ynezz
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hello Petr,
W dniu 2018-11-18 o 21:18, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 17:21:46]:
well as checking if rssileds package was indeed pulled in via "opkg list
Somehow the rssileds package wasn't enabled even if I've selected building of
nano-xm-w via menu config. I've deleted the
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 17:21:46]:
> well as checking if rssileds package was indeed pulled in via "opkg list
Somehow the rssileds package wasn't enabled even if I've selected building of
nano-xm-w via menu config. I've deleted the .config and created a new one,
then it was selected, weird.
Hi Petr,
Thanks for testing!
W dniu 2018-11-18 o 17:05, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 01:29:08]:
Hi,
Actually, I meant building and testing on ar71xx target instead of ath79.
But anyway, you might include this little change in your patch,
because when I added this support,
Lech Perczak [2018-11-18 01:29:08]:
Hi,
> Actually, I meant building and testing on ar71xx target instead of ath79.
> But anyway, you might include this little change in your patch,
> because when I added this support, XW wasn't ported to ath79 yet. Therefore
> the LED configuration didn't need
Hello Petr,
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 14:04, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-17 10:25:30]:
ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then secondary ethernet and USB only enabled in
respective .dts files. It'd be even better if someone on the list had a
Rocket M XW to test, as it is the fullest variant.
Lech Perczak [2018-11-17 10:25:30]:
> > > ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then secondary ethernet and USB only enabled in
> > > respective .dts files. It'd be even better if someone on the list had a
> > > Rocket M XW to test, as it is the fullest variant.
>
> > Hm, so maybe I should move definition of
Lech Perczak [2018-11-17 10:28:20]:
> Wasn't this possible with downgrading to AirOS 5 first just as it is done
> for XM series? Please take a look for instructions for them, on XM the
> procedure is quite easy.
I was using the same downgrade trick on other older UBNT devices as well, and
I
Hi Petr, Adrian,
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 07:44, Petr Štetiar pisze:
m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2018-11-16 19:15:41]:
Hi Adrian,
if I haven't overlooked it, the patch does not provide a "factory" Image as
in ar71xx, at least according to "Flashing instructions".
if I parse this correctly, then
W dniu 2018-11-17 o 07:33, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-16 18:46:40]:
Hi,
For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port, and
Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
Ah, thanks for explanation.
You're welcome
It'd be great if support for all of them
m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2018-11-16 19:15:41]:
Hi Adrian,
> if I haven't overlooked it, the patch does not provide a "factory" Image as
> in ar71xx, at least according to "Flashing instructions".
if I parse this correctly, then my answer is, that I simply didn't included
instructions for
Lech Perczak [2018-11-16 18:46:40]:
Hi,
> For example, Nanostation is basically a Bullet with extra ethernet port, and
> Rocket is a Bullet with added USB port.
Ah, thanks for explanation.
> It'd be great if support for all of them could be included in
> ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi, and then
; -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Lech Perczak
> Sent: Freitag, 16. November 2018 18:47
> To: Petr Štetiar
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: Add support for Ub
Hi,
W dniu 2018-11-16 o 16:13, Petr Štetiar pisze:
Lech Perczak [2018-11-15 19:30:00]:
Hi,
Just a couple of remarks inline, based on my knowledge about XM series.
thanks for the review!
+ ubnt,bullet-m2hp|\
I'd call it ubnt,bullet-m-xw, as this patch will very likely support
Lech Perczak [2018-11-15 19:30:00]:
Hi,
> Just a couple of remarks inline, based on my knowledge about XM series.
thanks for the review!
> > + ubnt,bullet-m2hp|\
>
> I'd call it ubnt,bullet-m-xw, as this patch will very likely support
> Bullet-M5HP also.
Ok
> > + link4 {
> > +
Hi,
Just a couple of remarks inline, based on my knowledge about XM series.
W dniu 2018-11-15 o 13:32, Petr Štetiar pisze:
From: Petr Štetiar
CPU: AR9342 SoC
RAM: 64 MB DDR2
Flash:8 MB NOR SPI
Ports: 100 MBit (24V PoE in)
WLAN: 2.4 GHz
UART: 1 UART on PCB marked as J1 with
17 matches
Mail list logo
