Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] packages for updated e1000/e1000e driver from SF
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Mark Deneen mden...@gmail.com wrote: +1 We had troubles with the adapter resetting itself in certain situations with the in-tree driver. Outside of the OpenWrt world, of course. Same here, except I was using OpenWRT on x86. Switching to the Intel driver has resolved all of our issues. -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] packages for updated e1000/e1000e driver from SF
Hello, On 12/22/11 10:33, Christoph Thielecke wrote: Hello, here are the packages for updated e1000 and e1000e drivers from sourceforge. Please notice that you can only use one of the drivers kmod-e1000 or e1000 (kmod-e1000e or e1000e). Any particular reasons not to use the mainline e1000 and e1000e drivers? -- Florian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] packages for updated e1000/e1000e driver from SF
Hello, here are the packages for updated e1000 and e1000e drivers from sourceforge. Please notice that you can only use one of the drivers kmod-e1000 or e1000 (kmod-e1000e or e1000e). Any particular reasons not to use the mainline e1000 and e1000e drivers? Yes, the mainline driver is old and buggy. The updated ones have a lot of fixes. I think these patches should go into package feeds only. With best regards Christoph -- Linux User Group Wernigerode http://www.lug-wr.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
