Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-10-03 Thread Tom Psyborg
On 30/09/2018, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:53 AM Stefan Lippers-Hollmann > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On 2018-09-29, Torbjorn Jansson wrote: >> > checkbox for hw offloading shows up for a fraction of a second when page >> > is >> > loaded but then it disappears. >> > so i take

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-30 Thread Hans Dedecker
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:53 AM Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > > Hi > > On 2018-09-29, Torbjorn Jansson wrote: > > checkbox for hw offloading shows up for a fraction of a second when page is > > loaded but then it disappears. > > so i take it luci removes it dynamically or something at page

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On 2018-09-29, Torbjorn Jansson wrote: > checkbox for hw offloading shows up for a fraction of a second when page is > loaded but then it disappears. > so i take it luci removes it dynamically or something at page load. flow-offloading has only beenbackported to kernel 4.14, if your target

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Sep 29, 2018, at 14:42, Torbjorn Jansson > wrote: > > On 2018-09-29 23:21, Rosen Penev wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2018, at 14:14, Torbjorn Jansson >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 2018-09-29 21:55, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:09, Jérôme Benoit wrote: > >> Le 29/09/2018 à

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Torbjorn Jansson
On 2018-09-29 23:21, Rosen Penev wrote: On Sep 29, 2018, at 14:14, Torbjorn Jansson wrote: On 2018-09-29 21:55, Rosen Penev wrote: On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:09, Jérôme Benoit wrote: Le 29/09/2018 à 16:56, Felix Fietkau a écrit : Flow offloading (as implemented in OpenWrt on 4.14)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Sep 29, 2018, at 14:14, Torbjorn Jansson > wrote: > > On 2018-09-29 21:55, Rosen Penev wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:09, Jérôme Benoit wrote: >>> Le 29/09/2018 à 16:56, Felix Fietkau a écrit : Flow offloading (as implemented in OpenWrt on 4.14) supports both

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Torbjorn Jansson
On 2018-09-29 21:55, Rosen Penev wrote: On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:09, Jérôme Benoit wrote: Le 29/09/2018 à 16:56, Felix Fietkau a écrit : Flow offloading (as implemented in OpenWrt on 4.14) supports both hardware offload and generic software offload for routing and NAT. SFE is not necessary

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Sep 29, 2018, at 12:09, Jérôme Benoit wrote: > >> Le 29/09/2018 à 16:56, Felix Fietkau a écrit : >> >> Flow offloading (as implemented in OpenWrt on 4.14) supports both >> hardware offload and generic software offload for routing and NAT. >> SFE is not necessary anymore. >> > So you've

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Jérôme Benoit
Le 29/09/2018 à 16:56, Felix Fietkau a écrit : > > Flow offloading (as implemented in OpenWrt on 4.14) supports both > hardware offload and generic software offload for routing and NAT. > SFE is not necessary anymore. > So you've made a backport of

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-09-28 15:54, Marko Ratkaj wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:14 PM Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> > They may not be able to push lots of bandwidth, but if you have >> > <~100Mbps internet they don't need to. If you have >~200Mbps internet >> > for example with DOCSIS3.1 provider,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2018-09-29 10:53, Jérôme Benoit wrote: > Le 28/09/2018 à 18:55, Rosen Penev a écrit : >> >> So in kernel 4.17 I believe landed flow offloading support. This >> accomplishes something similar to SFE while being a proper upstream >> solution. This is already implemented in OpenWrt. > > flow

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Jérôme Benoit
Le 29/09/2018 à 10:57, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : >>> So in kernel 4.17 I believe landed flow offloading support. This >>> accomplishes something similar to SFE while being a proper upstream >>> solution. This is already implemented in OpenWrt. >> flow offloading for NAT is different from SFE :

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Dear Jérôme, > On Sep 29, 2018, at 10:53, Jérôme Benoit wrote: > > Le 28/09/2018 à 18:55, Rosen Penev a écrit : >> >> So in kernel 4.17 I believe landed flow offloading support. This >> accomplishes something similar to SFE while being a proper upstream >> solution. This is already

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-29 Thread Jérôme Benoit
Le 28/09/2018 à 18:55, Rosen Penev a écrit : > > So in kernel 4.17 I believe landed flow offloading support. This accomplishes > something similar to SFE while being a proper upstream solution. This is > already implemented in OpenWrt. flow offloading for NAT is different from SFE : In the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-28 Thread Rosen Penev
> On Sep 28, 2018, at 07:20, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > >>> Is there any work in OpenWRT targeted at integrating Linux forwarding >>> fastpath in the official build ? >>> There are out-of-tree patches and builds floating around and nowadays 1 >>> GB/s fiber internet access is very common is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-28 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Is there any work in OpenWRT targeted at integrating Linux forwarding fastpath in the official build ? There are out-of-tree patches and builds floating around and nowadays 1 GB/s fiber internet access is very common is developed countries, and the router is then becoming the bottleneck in many

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-28 Thread Marko Ratkaj
Hi all, On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:14 PM Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > They may not be able to push lots of bandwidth, but if you have > > <~100Mbps internet they don't need to. If you have >~200Mbps internet > > for example with DOCSIS3.1 provider, then you probably need a newer > > dual-core device

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-28 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, They may not be able to push lots of bandwidth, but if you have <~100Mbps internet they don't need to. If you have >~200Mbps internet for example with DOCSIS3.1 provider, then you probably need a newer dual-core device to take advantage of it. Is there any work in OpenWRT targeted

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-28 Thread John Crispin
On 28/09/2018 06:35, Eric Luehrsen wrote: On 09/27/2018 04:22 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 09/26/2018 09:38 AM, Koen Vandeputte wrote: On 2018-09-23 00:42, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: Hi, We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-27 Thread Eric Luehrsen
On 09/27/2018 04:22 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 09/26/2018 09:38 AM, Koen Vandeputte wrote: On 2018-09-23 00:42, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: Hi, We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html This

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-27 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 09/26/2018 09:38 AM, Koen Vandeputte wrote: > > > On 2018-09-23 00:42, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html >> This mail is more or less a summary

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-26 Thread Hartmut Knaack
Koen Vandeputte schrieb am 26.09.2018 um 09:38: > These targets were also dropped in 18.06 branch. > Maybe we should also consider dropping support for these targets in master? > > > adm5120 I started working on this target last year, but had to focus on other topics meanwhile. Still, I would

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-26 Thread Koen Vandeputte
On 2018-09-23 00:42, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: Hi, We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html This mail is more or less a summary of the conclusions, this is still open for change especially the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-23 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On Sep 22, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi, > > We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html > This mail is more or less a summary of the conclusions, this

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-23 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 09/23/2018 08:20 PM, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 3:43 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html >> This mail is more or less a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt 19.01 plans

2018-09-23 Thread Rosen Penev
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 3:43 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > Hi, > > We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html > This mail is more or less a summary of the conclusions, this is still > open for