Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath9k: mtd-cal-data vs firmware bin file

2019-08-16 Thread Michal Cieslakiewicz
Hello Martin, Thank you (and Dmitry Tunin and Chuanhong Guo) for explaining this topic to me. Now it is perfectly clear. So the idea of reading mtd isn't completely abandoned, Martin's approach just seems to be more flexible and universal. On the other hand, I've never assumed sparing this 4k

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath9k: mtd-cal-data vs firmware bin file

2019-08-15 Thread Martin Blumenstingl via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi Michal, On Wed, Aug 14, 2019

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath9k: mtd-cal-data vs firmware bin file

2019-08-14 Thread Chuanhong Guo
Hi! On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:59 PM Michal Cieslakiewicz wrote: > /etc/hotplug.d/firmware/10-ath9k-eeprom for these routers just extracts > 4k of calibration data from ART to bin file in /lib/firmware. I > compared bin file to mtd area and they are identical. Why ath9k cannot > use this data

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ath9k: mtd-cal-data vs firmware bin file

2019-08-14 Thread Dmitry Tunin
> /etc/hotplug.d/firmware/10-ath9k-eeprom for these routers just extracts > 4k of calibration data from ART to bin file in /lib/firmware. I > compared bin file to mtd area and they are identical. Why ath9k cannot > use this data directly accessing /dev/mtd6? Is that 'mtd-cal-data' dts > option