Daniel Golle [2020-07-25 11:02:16]:
> Hence it makes sense exclude device images which are anyway not going
> to be offered for download (ie. 4/32 devices) from this change and keep
> them with wpad-mini. In the end it doesn't matter too much as anyone
> using the IB for those devices is anyway
> Understandably so. But like you said, they already have limited functionality
> at this point: wpad-mini versus wpad-basic. At the same time, a lot of those
> devices are EOL with 19.07, as you pointed out. So it would make more sense
> to just keep them on wpad-mini - and maybe, to make the end
Hi,
Op zaterdag 25 juli 2020 om 11u28 schreef Petr Štetiar :
Stijn Segers [2020-07-25 10:24:42]:
Hi,
I read Adrian's reply as 'we'll keep ath79/tiny out of the wpad SSL
push?'
but I might be mistaken of course.
the idea of this patch series is to have the _same_ baseline in _all_
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:24:42AM +0200, Stijn Segers wrote:
> ...
> P.S. Is there a way to use mbedtTLS with wpad? That would be neat since one
> could have
> LuCI SSL and wpad lean on the same crypto library. I am now building images
> with mbedTLS
> for LuCI and wolfssl for wpad; it's still
> On Jul 25, 2020, at 1:36 AM, Stijn Segers wrote:
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> Op zaterdag 25 juli 2020 om 10u08 schreef Petr Štetiar :
>> m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2020-07-24 17:36:08]:
>> Hi,
>>> I would prefer to not touch ar71xx here, as this is essentially only used
>>> for backporting, and
Stijn Segers [2020-07-25 10:24:42]:
Hi,
> I read Adrian's reply as 'we'll keep ath79/tiny out of the wpad SSL push?'
> but I might be mistaken of course.
the idea of this patch series is to have the _same_ baseline in _all_ images,
so HTTPS and WPA3-Personal by default. It wouldn't make much
Hi Petr,
Op zaterdag 25 juli 2020 om 10u08 schreef Petr Štetiar :
m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2020-07-24
17:36:08]:
Hi,
I would prefer to not touch ar71xx here, as this is essentially
only used
for backporting, and changing stuff would only make these backports
more
complicated, while
m...@adrianschmutzler.de [2020-07-24 17:36:08]:
Hi,
> I would prefer to not touch ar71xx here, as this is essentially only used
> for backporting, and changing stuff would only make these backports more
> complicated, while not really providing a benefit. (I'm not sure whether it
> can be still
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Petr Štetiar
> Sent: Freitag, 24. Juli 2020 16:30
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Petr Štetiar
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] treewide: use wpad-basic-wolfssl as default
>
