Am 22.05.13 21:11, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
Well, xmpp has moved alot since 2005. caps, pubsub, pep, carbons,
s2s-tls, compression, jingle... gtalk hasn't. So breaking up was a
reasonable thing to do.
There's a song in there somewhere. ;-)
50 ways to leave your lover? ;-)
Heya!
Do you guys have any tips for spam registrations for open servers? I'm
running one that eventually I'll add back to the list on xmpp.net but
before I do I wanted some tips on this :)
Thanks for any insight!
Alex
Please add my public XMPP service to the list at xmpp.net. The
information is as follows:
* *domain*: [creep.im]
* *website*: [http:/creep.im]
* *year launched*: [2012]
* *country*: [Russia]
* *latitude*: [55.7517° N]
* *longitude*: [37.6178° E]
* *CA*:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Justin Uberti jube...@google.com wrote:
That seems like an overly cynical assessment of the situation. Speaking as
an individual, it is sad that spammers were more willing to adopt XMPP than
other IM networks, but so it goes.
I'm not sure sufficient
Hi all,
It's been discussend and I'm keen to find out about authenticated and
encrypted s2s.
So I wonder what, if any, the current “standards” or suggestions on this
one are. I'm a fan of CACert, and I'd like to stick for that. How's the
reputation of CACert in the XMPP community? I believe I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/23/13 3:20 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
Google's was exasperated
Exacerbated? But our Google friends were probably exasperated, too.
not by simply allowing federation, but by allowing largely
unauthenticated federation, making it by far the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/23/13 1:39 AM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
Heya!
Do you guys have any tips for spam registrations for open servers?
I'm running one that eventually I'll add back to the list on
xmpp.net but before I do I wanted some tips on this :)
Thanks for
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Alex Hanselka a...@darkdna.net wrote:
Do you guys have any tips for spam registrations for open servers? I'm
running one that eventually I'll add back to the list on xmpp.net but before
I do I wanted some tips on this :)
The best advice I can give is not to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/23/13 9:22 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Alex Hanselka a...@darkdna.net
wrote:
Do you guys have any tips for spam registrations for open
servers? I'm running one that eventually I'll add back to the
list on xmpp.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/23/13 9:28 AM, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
I know that this proposal is kind of dangerous as it requires
introspection of the users messages.
But how about this: After registration, the users is put on a
surveillance list, for like a few days
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Jonas Wielicki
xmpp-operat...@sotecware.net wrote:
I know that this proposal is kind of dangerous as it requires
introspection of the users messages.
But how about this: After registration, the users is put on a
surveillance list, for like a few days or weeks.
23 maj 2013 kl. 17:06 skrev Jonas Wielicki xmpp-operat...@sotecware.net:
Hi all,
It's been discussend and I'm keen to find out about authenticated and
encrypted s2s.
So I wonder what, if any, the current “standards” or suggestions on this
one are. I'm a fan of CACert, and I'd like to
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote:
There are also likely options along these lines that involve less
privacy invasion than operators manually examining the accounts. A
captcha for every subscription request? Only one outstanding (not
reciprocated) roster
On 23 May 2013 11:15, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
At jabber.org, we turned off in-band registration and forced all users
to register via https://register.jabber.org/ with CAPTCHA required.
That did not really prevent spam registrations (at one point we had
over 10,000 users
Am 23.05.2013 17:38, schrieb Olle E. Johansson:
Now, with old SSL/TLS the server requiring a client cert had to say
I only accept client certs from these CA's. With TLS 1.x something
this was removed, which opens up a lot of new possibilities for
self-signed certs verified by other means, like
On 23 May 2013 23:50, Justin Uberti jube...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Justin Uberti jube...@google.com
wrote:
That seems like an overly cynical assessment of the situation. Speaking
as an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/23/13 4:50 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net
mailto:d...@cridland.net wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Justin Uberti
jube...@google.com mailto:jube...@google.com wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo