Dear Liu Ming, It is good to hear that your work has progressed. We very much appreciate your contribution to OPM, and I will take a look at your pull request for the implicit two-phase simulator shortly.
Regarding your polymer simulator, I am ok with making opm-polymer require opm-autodiff, but there are probably others who have opinions on this, as well. Last, I'll say that we have not decided when the next OPM release should be, by default I think we are looking at a 2014.04 release, but perhaps we should make it a 2014.05 release since there are so many large changes happening now: use of the new parser is a big part of that, integrating Markus Blatt's parallel grid code is another. Atgeirr 4. mars 2014 kl. 02:06 skrev Ming Liu <mi...@statoil.com>: > Dear all, > Yesterday I sent this email, because of the attachment, email is too big, so > I send it again.:) > I work on fully implicit polymer solvers for a long time, I think it’s time > to discuss with you about them. Last year, I visited SINTEF, meet with > Atgeirr , Bård , Xavier > and other nice developers, with their help, the fully implicit polymer solver > make great progress. > > Currently, Fully implicit polymer solvers just are two-phase which based on > opm-autodiff and opm-polymer. Because we want to start with incompressible > flow, > so first at all, I create an fully incompressible two-phase simulator, for > this simulator, I neglect all of the compressibility, but capillary and > gravity are included. > The main structure of the solver is similar with > opm-autodiff/FullyImplicitBlackoil.cpp, just copy and modify that file to > create the new solver. I notice that there are many > new features coming into both opm-core and opm-autodiff, I hope I can follow > them, but it needs time, for the current incompressible simulator, I just > apply > the new well controls. I did a simple test, the result is almost the same > with Atgeirr’s. Later, I will make a pull request to open it, any comments > are appreciated. > > For the fully implicit polymer simulator which include both incompressible > and compressible flow, has the following features: > 1. Adsorption > 2. Permeability reduction > 3. IPV > 4. Todd-Longstaff mixing > 5. Keyword “WPOLYMER” > The equations which we use are the same with ECLIPSE, and also the > parameters. We did several tests, including 2D and 3D,more realistic test > cases are going on. > We found that our result has a perfectly match with ECLIPSE. Beside the > current features, we are going to implement shear model, this needs some time. > If it is possible, I would like the fully implicit polymer simulator be part > of the OPM next release, but there are some issue need to be discussed: > 1. Currently , all of our codes are put in opm-polymer, so this means > opm-polymer require opm-autodiff, this could be a question, because I don’t > know > If this change can bring somethings bad to OPM. > 2. I know that new parser is coming, I need to catch up with them, but > I have not apply the new features to the polymer simulators, if the polymer > solver > want to attend the next OPM release, a lot of work need to be done, I hope > someone else who familiar with that can help me, I will appreciated. > > I am a new developer , there must be a lot of shortcomings, I am looking > forward to your comments. > Have a nice day! > > > Best Regards > Liu Ming > > > The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended > for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the > information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the > addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete > this message.Thank you _______________________________________________ > Opm mailing list > Opm@opm-project.org > http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
