s (I think 20.04?).
So if OPM requires some other interim version that is not LTS, I would
have to avoid that version.
Cheers,
-R
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:13:34 +
From: Alf Birger Rustad
To:"opm@opm-project.org"
Subject: [Opm] Dependencies
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
_
Fra: Opm på vegne av Markus Blatt
Sendt: tirsdag 28. januar 2020 10:36
Til: opm@opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 09:00:26AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> Despite what I initially wrote (that I want to increase the requirements), if
&
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 09:00:26AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> Despite what I initially wrote (that I want to increase the requirements), if
> we turn away potential users by this, that would be a good reason to NOT bump
> the requirements.
>
> Arne Morten's message implies that we ca
09:49
Til: Bård Skaflestad ; Joakim Hove
; opm@opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited
Personally I don't think Boost.Test is worth replacing, but getting rid of
filesystem and regex is certainly worthwhile.
As for dune, the ppa provides 2.6 for 18.04 and 16.04 already so i
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 09:36:47AM +0100, Joakim Hove wrote:
> Another recurring issue is Boost. If we jump to Debian Buster and Ubuntu
> > 19.04, this entails that we can bump minimum version of GCC to 8.3.0. Is
> > this sufficient to consider removing Boost as a dependency?
> >
>
> The parser us
9
Til: Bård Skaflestad ; Joakim Hove
; opm@opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited
Personally I don't think Boost.Test is worth replacing, but getting rid of
filesystem and regex is certainly worthwhile.
As for dune, the ppa provides 2.6 for 18.04 and 16.04 already so i
Bård Skaflestad
Sendt: tirsdag 28. januar 2020 09:47
Til: Joakim Hove ; opm@opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited
In addition to the Boost.Spirit component that Joakim mentions there's also the
practical issue that almost all of our unit tests target Boost.Test as a
-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Dependencies revisited
Hi all,
The world keeps on turning, and maybe it is time to revisit mimimum version
requirements for Flow dependencies. One of the more pressing issues is Dune. We
now have an implementation of CPR (constrained pressure residual) which
requires Dune to
Skaflestad
SINTEF Digital, Mathematics & Cybernetics
Computational Geosciences group
-Original Message-
From: Opm On Behalf Of Joakim Hove
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:37 AM
To: opm@opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited
Another recurring issue is Boost. If we
Another recurring issue is Boost. If we jump to Debian Buster and Ubuntu
> 19.04, this entails that we can bump minimum version of GCC to 8.3.0. Is
> this sufficient to consider removing Boost as a dependency?
>
The parser uses boost spirit::qi which at some stage proved to give a
performance gain
Hi all,
The world keeps on turning, and maybe it is time to revisit mimimum version
requirements for Flow dependencies. One of the more pressing issues is Dune. We
now have an implementation of CPR (constrained pressure residual) which
requires Dune to be version 2.6.0 or newer. Today, this mea
12 matches
Mail list logo
