Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. Please provide feed-back
if you like it or not. We can rename it or even delete it. It is called
opm-utilities and currently hosts the python script summaryplot. Right now it
is afaik the only tool we have to plot results
On 11/19/14 08:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. Please provide
feed-back if you like it or not. We can rename it or even delete it. It
is called opm-utilities and currently hosts the python script
summaryplot. Right now it is
Actually, I fully agree. However, opm-utilities may be an exception since it
contain(s) scripts and minor tools with no dependency within opm. The repo is
not intended for tools compiled with opm, such tools belong in the examples
folders within the repos. Right now it contains a stand-alone
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...]
Honestly, I don't think it's that good an idea to have separate
repositories at all [...]
Noted.
3. Increased
On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...]
Honestly, I don't think it's that good an idea to have separate
repositories
On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...]
Honestly, I don't think it's that good an idea to have separate
repositories
On 11/19/14 12:35, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...]
Honestly, I don't think it's that
Allright;
here comes my 2 cents on the topic:
1. The repo in question was for utilities which are not part of the build
process; so the build process is 100% unaffected by this new repo.
2. Updating the build system in opm is admittedly quite cumbersome; my
suggestion would be
On Wed Nov 19 2014 12:56:53 GMT-0600 (CST), Joakim Hove wrote:
BUT: I really think that the implicit organization and encapsulation coming
from using several repositories is essential for the survival of the opm code
and the developers.
I'm not exactly sure how this would be different
Hi all,
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 18:11:03 Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
This is what I propose instead:
Remove the repositories all-together and replace with a single opm repo.
So, you're proposing to undo the (more or less) careful separation
Hi,
On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 21:29:30 Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Oops, there you go, I actually forgot opm-material. Kind of underlines the
point of simplifying, we all get lost in the dependency tree. I believe
opm-material, just like opm-porsol, can be put into the other repos
wherever
11 matches
Mail list logo
