[OPM] New Gentoo hack

2014-06-30 Thread wireless
Hello OPM, I just subscribed. Is there anyone working on OPM via Gentoo? If so, is there an ebuild or overlay anywhere? If not, would folks be interested in my efforts to offer up an easy-to-install ebuild for for this open source reservoir effort? Most of the supporting libraries are already

[OPM] Howto Test OPM build on gentoo?

2014-07-21 Thread wireless
Howdy OPM folks, I was finally able to get a clean build on OPM (et. al.) ? Here is what has built (correctly?) on Gentoo: dev-cpp/eigen-3.1.3 app-admin/eselect-lapack-0.1 app-admin/eselect-blas-0.1 sci-libs/amd-2.2.0 sci-libs/blas-reference-20070226 virtual/blas-1.0 sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0

Re: [OPM] Grid interface

2014-08-10 Thread wireless
On 08/09/14 18:45, wireless wrote: On 08/09/14 07:18, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: Hello everybody, Finally we have a reference black-oil simulator coming into shape, but admittedly still some rough edges to iron out. During this effort we uncovered challenges with our plumbing. The most

Re: [OPM] Grid interface

2014-08-10 Thread wireless
-articles/conference-presentations/#GPGPU7 [Z] http://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/2430/structured-grid-and-unstructured-grid [W] http://www.dune-project.org/doc/doxygen/dune-grid-html/modules.html [V] http://www.siam.org/pdf/news/1912.pdf Cheers, Alf wireless wirel...@tampabay.rr.com

Re: [OPM] Grid interface

2014-08-27 Thread wireless
On 08/27/14 06:54, robert.kloefk...@iris.no wrote: I think I have seen one new grid interface per year for the last 7 or so years. And they were all introduced for very good reasons. So I am a little reluctant to enter this discussion again... Atgeirr Hi Atgeirr, thanks for your

Re: [OPM] Grid interface

2014-08-27 Thread wireless
On 08/27/14 08:34, Paolo Orsini wrote: For that reason I can comment only from a user point of view. One of the reasons we are looking at OPM is because we are looking to for an open source black-oil simulator which we can start testing, using, and eventually help with the development of the

Re: [OPM] Make issue: git builds of opm-upscaling ( friends) fails - missing version directives in Finddune-cornerpoint.cmake

2014-09-06 Thread wireless
On 09/06/14 07:39, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: Hi James, I believe most of your questions have been (at least attempted) answered on the contributions link of the webpage, and the front page of the wiki. http://opm-project.org/contrib.php http://www.opm-project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Re: [OPM] New repo opm-utilities

2014-11-19 Thread wireless
On 11/19/14 08:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: Hello everybody, I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. Please provide feed-back if you like it or not. We can rename it or even delete it. It is called opm-utilities and currently hosts the python script summaryplot. Right now it is

Re: [OPM] New repo opm-utilities

2014-11-19 Thread wireless
On 11/19/14 12:35, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote: On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: Hello everybody, I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...] Honestly, I don't think it's that

Re: [OPM] Build system updates

2015-03-17 Thread wireless
On 03/17/2015 09:07 AM, Joakim Hove wrote: Opm-cmake: https://github.com/joakim-hove/opm-cmake Gentoo is so cool, I found this package that our rpm bretheran might find useful cat /usr/portage/dev-util/cmake-fedora/cmake-fedora-1.3.0.ebuild # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation #

Re: [OPM] Build system updates

2015-03-17 Thread wireless
On 03/17/2015 09:07 AM, Joakim Hove wrote: Hello; at the OPM meeting in Trondheim we discussed changes to the opm-build system. Two independent goals were identified: 1.Make the build system easier to maintain and improve for developers; the main “solution” to this is to create a opm-cmake

Re: [OPM] Build system updates

2015-03-17 Thread wireless
On 03/17/2015 09:07 AM, Joakim Hove wrote: Managed build: https://github.com/akva2/opm-meta This is pretty simple and straight forward on gentoo; you just list the source packages and add the inter-package magic in an ebuild. Take for example all the new excitement over QT5 and the

Re: [OPM] Build system updates

2015-03-17 Thread wireless
On 03/17/2015 09:07 AM, Joakim Hove wrote: Opm-cmake: https://github.com/joakim-hove/opm-cmake Reinventing the wheel? Gentoo has an excellent package for building cmake from sources. There's also another called cmake-fedora, for folks that roll that way: cat

Re: [OPM] New OPM release in April

2015-03-27 Thread wireless
On 03/27/2015 05:26 AM, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: Hi! We have now started a process to make a new OPM release. Our last release was in October 2013,which is a very long time ago! At some point it was decided to postpone the release, waiting for the fully implicit black-oil simulator (which now

Re: [OPM] release candidate packages in PPA

2015-04-14 Thread wireless
On 04/14/2015 07:04 AM, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: Thank you very much, Arne Morten! I will be testing these on Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty). I would appreciate it if someone could test the 12.04 (precise) packages as well. At this point we consider 10.04 too old to support, it would have required

Re: [OPM] ninja vs cmake

2015-06-10 Thread wireless
On 06/08/2015 06:04 PM, Roland Kaufmann wrote: On 8th June 2015 at 20:45, wireless wrote: Would anyone have any OPM experience or guidance with using ninja on OPM? My experience is that this basically works; use --enable-ninja with the configure script, or -G Ninja directly with CMake. I use

[OPM] Complementary math codes?

2015-07-21 Thread wireless
Hello OPM, Somebody just posted on Gentoo about an interesting math package that might be of interest to the wider OPM community: snip Dear Gentoo Developers, We have just released the version 0.1.4 of ASL - Advanced Simulation Library http://asl.org.il. May I ask somebody to volunteer to

Re: [OPM] Supported DUNE versions / libtool libraries

2015-08-25 Thread wireless
On 08/25/2015 05:17 AM, Andreas Lauser wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 25 August 2015 11:00:35 Bård Skaflestad wrote: On 25/08/15 10:52, Markus Blatt wrote: [Snip background] I am wondering whether we should stop supporting autotools for downstream modules and stop creating *.la files. (I guess this