Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] poll for APAC friendly time slot for weekly meeting

Unless someone from Europe accepts a time, this appears to be an APAC-only meeting (it’s doubtful anyone from North America will join at the proposed times: something to discuss if this wasn’t the intention). Al From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [daisy4nfv]

Hi Chris Thanks for reminding me. I updated the meeting logistics info at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Meetings B.R., Zhijiang 发件人: Christopher Price 收件人: , , ,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] poll for APAC friendly time slot for weekly meeting

So far, four participants have taken the poll. See http://doodle.com/poll/fa4nspdf4ta2u7pb I would suggest we close the vote before this weekend. -- Yujun On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:25 PM Yujun Zhang wrote: > Dear testers, > > As an action of last weekly meeting, I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Update release documentation [opnfvdocs]

Hello, Sofia, For multisite, Kingbird is a new service for quota management in multisite project, an installation guide without installer support(installers not supported it yer) for the new service is provided. User guide/installation guide/configuration guide is provided in multisite

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

+1. Let me give an example of IPv6, which Dovetail is using it as a template of developing test cases: Step 1: understand IPv6 feature and its gaps with Mitaka and Boron * Reference: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/ipv6/docs/userguide/index.html Step 2: understand current test case coverage in

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

Chris, I either don't understand or don't agree to the statement that the Functest isn't designed to be generic, at least as a framework. Certainly where we leverage upstream test suites e.g. Tempest/rally they are contextual, but so far we have no other cloud VIM in OPNFV except for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

I would say rather that the Dovetail system needs to be aware of what system and components are under test, and select as fully as possible the compatible tests from the Functest and Yardstick suites. We should not narrow down the scope to just what will run across all implementations, even

[opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC Committer At Large nomination: Tom Nadeau

Hi all, * Name: Tom Nadeau * Employer: Brocade * As an outgoing TSC member, I think Tom would be another great representative of the Silver members in the TSC, and his practical experience in open source has been, and will continue to be, invaluable to the group. I would

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Network issues during OPFNV deployment

Hi All, I've trying to deploy OPFNV environment using Fuel (IP: 10.20.0.2) as Jump Host based on http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/brahmaputra/docs/configguide/configguide.pdf instructions. Problems occur on the step 3.3 Preparing the Functest environment. Execution of

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, PDT 18:00-19:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, Pacific time 17:00-18:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, PDT 18:00-19:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi Chris: Sure. hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年8月10日 20:26 收件人: Tianhongbo; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 主题: Re: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on the last meeting.  Can we discuss it as a group on Friday before changing what was agreed 5 days ago?  (Note: releng did create it’s own channel but no longer uses it, rather they work on community channels as separate channels are at times not

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Hi Frank, That’s not possible with the instructions/scripts provided.  There may be some black magic that could be done but I am really not familiar enough to provide it. In general though, the docs rendering is not a heavyweight activity and it should not take more than a few seconds

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Update release documentation [opnfvdocs]

Hi everyone, After reviewing the status for Colorado we have agreed that: Feature projects should produce a ”user guide” for their feature according to: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/18311/ Scenario’s should also have a brief description

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi Chris: Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting. But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC all time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick. If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that. That is the problem. Best Regards hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Just to clarify: I’d like to use the OPNFV tool chain on a set of specific files only and see whether they render correctly – as opposed to just use rst2html (which is what I currently do). Thanks, Frank From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Hi Chris, thanks for the pointer. Is there a way to just check whether a single file builds/parses correctly – rather than always building the entire project? Thanks, Frank From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi Hongbo, If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people preferred to use opnfv-meeting.  I had not heard anyone speak to the desire to create another IRC channel for this meeting series. My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, our

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

Hi all: Thanks for the deep suggestion and discussion. The Dovetail and C have discussed many times about some of the questions. I will add the related slides and works on the I created a wiki page for these questions discussions. It will help others who missed the discussions. If you have any

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Topics for this weeks call

Hi Hongbo, As these topics relate to the “test suites requirements” area I have added them as topics to the existing wiki page.  As these are “blank slate” questions I have left it open for input and not added much to the wiki at this stage. Naming convention: