Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

Hi Mark, For now we don't have bulk removing function using TestAPI. And I doubt it is a good idea to have it. All the results pushed to testresults.opnfv.org's TestDB must be meaningful, as it is kind of an official purpose. If someone wants to use TestAPI as development purpose, I suggest

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] UNH-IOL Plugfest / Hackfest

Thanks, Lincoln! I'm looking forward to meeting you in person. Best, Ash Sent from my iPad > On Nov 30, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > > Hello All, > > Apologizes for the untagged message, but I wanted to make sure I reached > everyone attending the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] UNH-IOL Plugfest / Hackfest

Hello All, Apologizes for the untagged message, but I wanted to make sure I reached everyone attending the plugfest / hackfest next week. Let me be the first to welcome you to New Hampshire and the InterOperability Laboratory, we are all very excited to host you and the events next week. The

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [MANO] New time for MANO WG Calls?

Hi all, Intel (Alex Vul) would like to get engaged in the MANO WG calls as we consider the architectural aspects as he's directly engaged in Open-O strategy including service/VNF modeling (which is a topic of the Models project but also touches on the roles/design of the MANO stack

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] [MANO] Meeting #13 todays Summary and next Meeting #14 - Nov 30th Wednesday 15 UTC

Hi all Please review the following suggestion for VNFM, NFVO registration to Keystone with Glance Image Catalog displaying artifacts and an OSS Monitor abstraction to verify that the instances of these two MNO components are available to take functionla calls to manage VNF life cycle. 5

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Meeting Minutes, November 30, 2016

http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-30-15.03.html Brady ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach

hello, Goutham, When I tried to review your update, and click "see new changes", it said you have removed the update, I did not find the update yet. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Goutham Pratapa [goutham.prat...@tcs.com] Sent: 29 November 2016 17:09

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] weekly meeting agenda, November 20, 2016

Performance Profiling presentation available here https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByKmzUuCWRteZjlsZTZWUU1CRGc BR, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen Johnson Sent: Wednesday, November 30,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] weekly meeting agenda, November 20, 2016

Lets talk about the following today: * Status and possible workarounds for OVS problems with multiple VXLAN ports [0] * Status of testing refactoring * Performance profiling (presentation by George) * SFC/VPP integration task roadmap Regards, Brady [0]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] "gate" job BEFORE merging

Thanks for the information. Looking forward to the evolution of CI infra. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:59 PM Fatih Degirmenci < fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What we have as verify jobs corresponds to what openstack calls check and > these are not enough to gate commits as you