Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Yardstick] Agenda for Yardstick meeting 13 Dec

Hi Ok let's discuss it during next meeting we have already something in Functest so we should take care not bringing confusion here an earlier discussion said that VNF onboarding could be done in Functest (as we have the vIMS and should have additional ones for Danube) based on that, Yardstick

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] doctor CI now available

Hi Ryota, I know that Munich Lab and another Lab from HUAWEI are preparing to provide to Community. I think you can contract Phraos guys to comfirm it. Best Regards Justin 在 2016/12/8 6:41, Ryota Mibu 写道: Yujun, Yes, but I can remove it if some can provide POD(s) for these CI jobs.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] doctor CI now available

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM Ryota Mibu wrote: Yujun, Yes, but I can remove it if some can provide POD(s) for these CI jobs. Maybe I can put document how to build such pod. That would be great. Let me see if we can request some resource from ZTE lab for Doctor CI.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] doctor CI now available

Locked to the ool-virtual1 POD: https://git.opnfv.org/releng/tree/jjb/doctor/doctor.yml Carlos From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 December 2016 02:07 To: Ryota Mibu; Carlos Goncalves; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] doctor

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Apex] C3.0 artifacts for Apex

Thanks, Tim. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Tim Rozet wrote: > Hey Aric, David, > Here are the artifacts built for release: > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/apex/colorado/opnfv-2016-12-05.iso > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/apex/colorado/opnfv-apex-3.0- > 20161205.noarch.rpm >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SDNVPN test Case fail criteria

+1 to disable (not remove) tests that don't work due to upstream missing functionality. The problem is: how do we show the upstream community that it fails and we would like to use that? +1 to remove release criteria from all the test cases in sdnvpn, which is the same as requiring 100%

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Discussion for OpenRetriever

Hello Xuan Jia, My thinking on this is that when you are running a containerized VNF, you will interact primarily with the COE - the infrastructure (and thus, whether it's AWS, Azure, OpenStack, or MyLittleCloud APIs) should be abstracted away and is not part of the application definition - the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Yardstick] Agenda for Yardstick meeting 13 Dec

Hi Kubi We have had some good discussions here at Plugfest with Rex and others regarding adding VNF test features to Yardstick. Can we add this as an agenda topic to next meeting (13/12 (0:03 UTC)(US time slot)? I have added this to the agenda as a *proposed* topic. Trevor

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [openo-tsc] OPERA is calling for developers for Open-O integration

Thanks Arthur for the help. We will reference these codes. Regards Yingjun From: Arthur Berezin [mailto:art...@gigaspaces.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 7:06 AM To: Yingjun Li; John Zannos; 赵化冰10201488; Land Lu; Artur Tyloch; Narinder Gupta; Mark Ramm-Christensen (Canonical.com) Cc:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Single recurring meetings for the two GTM accounts

We used the odd vs. even hour setup when we had separate call in numbers for individual meetings (to avoid calls being disconnected if your meeting went long). Obviously this will no longer be an issue as we move to single dial-ins for each account Can we stay with the method for now so that

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach

Hi all, Made some comments regarding Syncing of multiple keypairs at a time https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N6HFAFUT5BbEp1wbnYjgaKdOlyJanwkXccv-_1zsVQc/edit?disco=A4VEf0U as off now we have implemented keypair-sync for a specified keypair or sync all keypairs Ashish and I thought

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Single recurring meetings for the two GTM accounts

Hi, Bumping this thread. My understanding is as well that we should be able to use both meeting accounts in parallel, independent from the starting hour. Ray, can you confirm this? Best regards Georg From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Secgroup syncing Approach

Hello, two comments in the doc. Need to discuss this in the weekly meeting. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Goutham Pratapa [goutham.prat...@tcs.com] Sent: 07 December 2016 14:15 To: joehuang Cc: Ashish Singh7; Dimitri Mazmanov; Ashish singh; caizhiyuan