Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the project life cycle/graduation review discussion

I'm your Huckleberry Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 7, 2017, at 22:14, Raymond Paik wrote: > > All, > > As discussed on the TSC call today, I'd like to solicit some volunteers as we > look to wrap-up the discussion on the project life cycle/graduation reviews. > >

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: HA project meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:HA project meeting DESCRIPTION:Update info for next week?s project meeting. We will have to sw itch back to GTM due to connection problem in certain facilities in the US .\n\nMeetings for High

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: HA project meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:HA project meeting DESCRIPTION:Update info for next week?s project meeting. We will have to sw itch back to GTM due to connection problem in certain facilities in the US .\n\nMeetings for High

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project graduation discussions

Sounds like a practical idea Tapio. Graduation and Termination Reviews only could be sufficient for our purpose. Best, Ashiq From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tallgren, Tapio Sent: Tuesday, March 07,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Invitation: [ovn4nfv] Project meeting @ Fri Mar 10, 2017 10am - 11am (PST) (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20170310T18Z DTEND:20170310T19Z DTSTAMP:20170308T011129Z ORGANIZER;CN=Vikram Dham:mailto:vikramd...@gmail.com UID:er1bjeslfo4o1qedgsvejfs...@google.com

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [it-infrastructure-alerts] [announce] OPNFV Maintainance: 2017-03-12 @ 1PM-1:30PM EST

[it-infrastructure-alerts] [announce] OPNFV Maintainance: 2017-03-12 @ 1PM-1:30PM EST Hello, The Linux Foundation will be performing an update and restart of Gerrit (gerrit.opnfv.org) to fix the error: gerrit : Internal error during upload-pack $repo_name Why: Afaik this just impacts

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update

FYI, I submitted a patch to move the ves_plugin to the v3 of the VES API. https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/29959/ We have rebased the VES code for Danube on the latest AT release on github and integrated the current version of the ves_plugin. But we need the plugin to use the "v3" API

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update

Hi folks No call today due to cancellations... [barometer] Update [ACTION]: Maryam to add collectd usecase diagrams to wiki. --> done https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Collectd+Abstraction+Layer+usecases there are some more diagrams to be added in based on the agent discussion

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [barometer] Weekly Call

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:GMT Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+ RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T01

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenStack Summit Forum

Technical Community -- As Tom and Kathy explained on the TSC call this morning, what had been OpenStack Design Summit is being shifted and renamed to The Forum. The intention is to look further out at future releases, engage in more strategic discussion, and to ensure that Developers, Ops folks,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New project directory page on the wiki

It's great! Is it possible to add the date when the project got passed and archived? Raymond Paik 于2017年3月4日周六 上午1:09写道： > Yes, adding "one-liners" is the next area for improvement. > > We'll have to use the page properties feature (learning this from Mark), > but

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project graduation discussions

I agree. According to the definitions, most of the projects should be in Integration Review by now. If we keep the Graduation Review and Termination Review, we could drop Integration Review. -Tapio On 03/07/2017 08:39 AM, Ashiq Khan wrote: +1 Ashiq