[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Weekly Technical Discussion #98 @ Thursday, 17 August 2017

AUG

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Weekly Technical Discussion #98 @ Thursday, 17 August 2017

AUG

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added Intel to the table as offering a Pharos POD for the beta trial. “Only bugs submitted by the beta testers will be reviewed and accepted during Beta” … why would we only fix bugs reported by beta testers? ALL reported bugs should be investigated and prioritized. /Trevor From:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

Alec, Thank you for your input, and letting know you won’t be able to make the meeting tomorrow. Mark, Do you still want to discuss in the meeting tomorrow? (my only concern is the attendance, which may not warrant an effective live discussion. Or do you think the discussion on mailing list

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Auto] Weekly meeting day and time doodle

Dear all, The Auto project was approved at TSC meeting this Tuesday. I would like to doodle poll for the weekly meeting day and time here. Please say your preference here. https://doodle.com/poll/tnx9n5thuep5dtem Thank you, Tina Tsou Enterprise Architect Arm

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] weekly call agenda 8/11

I added the table for beta participants. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 10:44 PM To: Dave Urschatz ; Lincoln Lavoie ; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] [Bottlenecks] VSPERF and StorPerf

Hello, Trevor and VSPERF team. I'd like to get a quick overview of VSPERF and how the metrics are captured. Sorry if these are dumb questions :) First, is there a test that simply pushes packets over the network to see what the maximum throughput is, like a saturation test? Does VSPERF

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] Meeting #41 Summary and plan for Meeting#42 next week

Hi all, Please find Meeting#41 mano-wg Summary (this week Wednesday) http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-mano/2017/opnfv-mano.2017-08-16-13.57.html Meeting#42 planed next week Wednesday Agenda link : https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111 Thanks Prakash

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [StorPerf] 2017-08-16 Meeting Notes

Hello, everyone. Thanks to those who attended today's meeting. Minutes can be found here [1]. We had a good discussion about approaches for Bottlenecks to run VSPERF and StorPerf at the same time. This resulted in a great idea from Ace about enhancing StorPerf to support multiple stacks with

[opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC weekly meeting MoMs week 33

Hi, Here are the MoMs of today's meeting: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv- sfc.2017-08-16-14.00.html Regards, Manuel___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Doctor] Integration with VNFM

Hi Ifat, We have a minor modification to the script zabbix_vitrage.py. It’s just at line 83 we split only for the first ‚=’ as sometimes the expression value may contain „=” and it confuses the split function. Best Regards, Paul From: Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 16 Aug 2017

Previous Minutes - ww32 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-09-14.45.html - ww31 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-08-02-14.55.html - ww30

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

I usually mean “ports” (distinct ethernet connections) when I say “NIC” so by I expect production-grade servers to typically come with 4 onboard ports, often configured as 2 10GB and 2 1GB. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

Few comments: • Would it be possible to distinguish between NICs and ports? When I see “2 NICs” or “4 NICs” I suppose these are 10G ports? • I’d recommend using DPDK compliant NICs everywhere, best is to use NICs that are known to work well with DPDK (e.g. Intel X710 NIC has

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

True. A 2port 10GE NIC is ~500 $US. I've already updated the wiki :) Thanks again, Frank From: Bryan Sullivan [mailto:bls...@hotmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 16. August 2017 15:36 To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) ; Fatih Degirmenci ;

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [StorPerf] Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

Bryan, Thanks for raising an important point. IMHO 2 NICs are the minimal setup. This allows for performance focused setups (i.e. traffic enters on one NIC and leaves on another NIC), and it also allows for setups where you use the NICs for different purposes (e.g. dedicate a NIC to the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Bottlenecks] Bottlenecks weekly meeting August 17th 2017

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800