Hi All,
Cancelling this week's meeting due to travel commitments of few members.
I'm Sorry - see you all next week.
Cheers,
Sridhar
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22460):
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/2246
Thank you Cedric.
Certainly, a DevOps strategy will help guide the right choice, especially
removing the dependencies between projects and reducing the cycles, and
enhancing the test activities across various verticals.
Thank you
Bin
-Original Message-
From: ollivier.ced...@gmail.com
Hello,
I don't know if the current issues are related to a missing strategy
but I think we are moving away from the project scope.
Why not emphazing here XCI which only supports virtual machine
deployment and the compliance program which mainly includes sparsed
functional tests. But our endusers
Reminder - nominations close this Friday. I'd like to see more nominations
for the "integration" category, as well as for interns. Thanks.
David
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM David McBride
wrote:
> Many of you already noticed this, but I forgot to include a nominating
> statement to the lis
The error message shown is “Check that virtualization is enabled in the host
BIOS, and host configuration is setup to load the kvm modules.”.
What is the output of?
kvm-ok
or:
egrep -c '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo
Regards,
Mark
Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Developer
Dell EMC | Cloud & Com
Hi Qihui,
Unfortunately I have collision with this call tomorrow and won’t be able to
dial-in.
The plans look good on high level, please let me know if you need any input
from me.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ildikó
> On 2018. Nov 21., at 13:22, zhaoqi...@chinamobile.com wrote:
>
> Hello Edge C
Georg,
Thank you for your questions and concerns.
One key role of TSC is to provide direction to the community, which is the
other pillar that strengthens the community-driven approach. The direction from
TSC will inspire the community and represent our community externally, and the
"personal
Hi Bin,
Hi all,
Due to the lively discussions during today's TSC call, the IRC minutes are a
little light [1]. However, I have to voice my concern that I cannot agree with
the following items:
[.]
14:41:31 #info Vote for strategy on Tuesday Dec 4
14:42:01 #info Hopefully everyone will agree
1
Intel will have a planned downtime from 11/30@12:00PM until approximately
1/3@12:00PM Pacific.
No OPNFV Lab services will be available during this time frame.
We will communicate via this list once services have been restored.
Tim Gresham
Open Source Technology Center - Cloud Engineer
Intel
Thank you for pointing out one possibility based on the assumption that the
same resources will do both work. The assumption itself may not be true because
there will be different resources to do different work in different projects
(which is the reality today).
So the resource availability is
TASK [create-nodes : Start the opnfv vm]
An exception occurred during task execution. To see the full traceback, use
-vvv. The error was: li
Hi Tina,
The issue is still there. After analyzing it further I have realized that it is
a larger problem with the OpenStack deployment. On the last meeting Paul said
that he will try taking a look at it and reinstalling using fuel. I think this
would be the correct way to go forward and I hop
The way I understand Trevor's concern is that if we start spending more
time on packaging tools and supporting their usage downstream, there
will be less time for doing integration work and driving upstream
production readiness. Which is something I'm concerned about too.
Pretending that this prob
13 matches
Mail list logo
