Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [docs] Fuel and Armband merged documentation

Hi, Ray, It’s hard to say whether this will continue beyond E release. Meanwhile, we will keep the docs dir in Armband, like we did in previous releases. BR, Alex From: Raymond Paik [mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 6:26 AM To: Alexandru Avadanii Cc: Sofia

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [docs] Fuel and Armband merged documentation

Hi Alex, I think the best solution is to remove the document links for Armband on docs.opnfv.org (or have them linked to Fuel documentation). But keep the docs directory in your repo if things would change in the future. //Sofia From: Raymond Paik Date: Monday, 16

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [docs] Fuel and Armband merged documentation

Hi Alex, I think it makes sense for Armband team to have a separate documentation if you are going have support of other installers (e.g. Apex or JOID) in the future I agree that replicating docs is wasteful, but do you think this would continue beyond Euphrates? Thanks, Ray On Sunday,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [docs] Fuel and Armband merged documentation

I prefer to maintain it in installer project. If the affected content can be documented in installer project properly, it will be easier for maintainer, developer and end user. Julien Alexandru Avadanii 于2017年10月15日周日 下午11:27写道： > Hi, > During the E release cycle,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [docs] Fuel and Armband merged documentation

Hi, During the E release cycle, Fuel and Armband projects merged their documentation(s). Currently, the contents of Fuel's 'docs/' dir describe usage for both architecture. To keep the old behavior unchanged, we duplicated that docs dir in Armband for now. Going forward, I think building the