Thanks, Manuel.
I would like to encourage others to chime in too, as I hope OPNFV will continue
to have new project proposals :)
I really like the idea of Git based comments. I too have seen this done in
other projects, and it’s a great way of being able to track history and
comments. This
Jim,
Thank you for the good questions.
Regarding 1 "Step 2, third bullet", in the past practice, this situation hasn’t
happened. Once there were comments, the author of project proposals would
actively work with those who made comments, revised proposals and brought it
back to community
Greetings Bin,
Thanks for your sharing your thinking on how the process works. There are a
couple items I wanted to ask you to address:
1. "Step 2, third bullet" uses the word "consensus", without a clear
definition of what that means. Can one objection hold up a project request?
2. In "Step 3",
