All, Wanted to follow-up via email in order to save sometime during the TSC call tomorrow (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-March6,2017)....
Besides a single comment on the wiki page ( https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Graduation+review+discussions), I don't believe there were other feedback so here's my recommendation. Based on past discussions, I believe there's consensus that graduation reviews are good ways of recognizing mature projects that can server as role models for the rest of the community. In addition, I don't think there's any need to make any modifications to the graduation review process in the current OPNFV Project Lifecycle ( https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle). There was a discussion on whether a project team can step forward for a graduation review or if there should be a nomination from the community, but I think either way will work. Let me know if you have any other questions/comments. If not, we could probably reach a quick consensus on the call tomorrow. Thanks, Ray On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > All, > > I don't think I managed to follow-up after our discussions at the Plugfest > on graduation reviews. I created a wiki page summarizing my notes at > https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Graduation+review+discussions If you > have any questions or comments, please feel free to add them to the > comments section on the wiki page or reply to this email. > > I also had a chance to talk to a few OpenDaylight community members last > week and confirmed that projects that passed graduation/promotion reviews > in their community serve as "role models" for other members of the > community. > > I can bring this up during the TSC call tomorrow if we have time... > > Thanks, > > Ray >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
