iscuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
Hi,
I think we have to update the Project Governance to be able to remove inactive
committers. I can take a look at that. The initial idea really was that
committers had an im
regards,
Gerald
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tapio Tallgren
Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016 09:11
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
Hi,
I
mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>]
*Sent:* 14 December 2016 15:10
*To:* joehuang; Raymond Paik
*Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss
*Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list
maintainance
I think there is no mandatory rule for
PM joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> In OPNFV we "assume bad faith"? This is not a good assumption.
>
> The less meeting, the better, and usually a TSC meeting will be in the
> night or early morning for me to join. If even need to go to TSC meeting
> for 5
m]
Sent: 14 December 2016 15:10
To: joehuang; Raymond Paik
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list
maintainance
I think there is no mandatory rule for PTL to
attend TSC meeting in order to complete the removal
process. At least, I never did that before.
On my side,
> *From:* Yujun Zhang [zhangyujun+...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 14 December 2016 15:10
> *To:* joehuang; Raymond Paik
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
>
> I think there is no mandatory rule for PTL to attend TSC meetin
-
> *From:* Raymond Paik [rp...@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>]
> *Sent:* 14 December 2016 13:33
>
> *To:* joehuang
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech
ember 2016 15:10
To: joehuang; Raymond Paik
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
I think there is no mandatory rule for PTL to attend TSC meeting in order to
complete the removal process. At least, I never did that before.
On my side, I have tried
> Best Regards
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
> --
> *From:* Raymond Paik [rp...@linuxfoundation.org]
> *Sent:* 14 December 2016 13:33
>
> *To:* joehuang
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
>
here, just let
it be.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
From: Raymond Paik [rp...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: 14 December 2016 13:33
To: joehuang
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
Joe,
On the first point, I'm no
* 14 December 2016 12:43
> *To:* joehuang
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
>
> Joe,
>
> If there's an inactive committer (for more than 6 months) and the PTL is
> not able to reach that committer for whatever reason
(joehuang)
From: Raymond Paik [rp...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: 14 December 2016 12:43
To: joehuang
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] committer list maintainance
Joe,
If there's an inactive committer (for more than 6 months) and the PTL
Joe,
If there's an inactive committer (for more than 6 months) and the PTL is
not able to reach that committer for whatever reason, the PTL needs to make
a request to the TSC to revoke the committer status. The PTL should not do
this unilaterally.
Please see the 8th paragraph in the Section 8
Hello,
In each project's wiki page, we often list committers and contributors, as
OPNFV's ongoing development, some new committers come, some committers grow
other interesting and put less focus on the old project.
I have one suggestion for the maintenance on committer list: for those who have
14 matches
Mail list logo
