Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

We are making some progress. While I do agree with this: “I think projects should have autonomy over when branches are created.”. I also think it is up to the release project to set the projects with the latest date to do it if they want to participate in any given release. I think that’s

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest meetup poll

Hi, I would like to organize a Functest meetup Europe. For Colorado, the event was kindly hosted by Nokia in Finland, Orange will be very happy to welcome the participants in Lannion (Brittany) - 1h flight from Paris, 15 minutes from the coast

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Plugfest] Wiki Updates

Hello All, I have completed the first part of the action items from yesterday's call to update the wiki. - I've created a table on the main page to help capture any resource requirements. If you know of specific

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Security Article in linux.com

Did they edit that bit out? From: on behalf of Ash Date: Tuesday 13 September 2016 at 16:06 To: Raymond Paik Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: Re:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] NetReady weekly project meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Berlin BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Discussion Forum Tool to ease IRC/Mailing list issues

All, As I mentioned on the TSC call, this morning, I think we're simply trying to use the wrong tools. Now, part of the problem is that other communities place a heavy dependency upon certain ones, such as IRC. But I can't help but hear a nagging voice ask, "So, if Tommy jumps off a cliff, does

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story

Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovsnfv-tech-discuss][sfc][apex][ovsnfv] OVS with NSH patches in Colorado release

Brady, Thanks. --TFH On 09/13/2016 01:26 AM, Brady Allen Johnson wrote: Thomas, For the Colorado release, SFC is using the NSH Intel patches directly from the Yi Yang github repo. https://github.com/yyang13/ovs_nsh_patches Regards, Brady On 09/09/16 17:37, Thomas F Herbert wrote:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

I think that we've reduced the branch-related overhead in 'Danube' by closing the stable branch window just 10 days before the release, as opposed to about a month with Colorado. My concern about individual projects deciding whether to branch is that I think that it creates some confusion about

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

+1 – that sounds like a really simple resolution to the problem: “Unless you’re on the release branch and the release runs are done using the branch, you cannot participate in the release”. Frank From: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 21:06

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] security review

I think we may set debug to False by default and pass this option as argument. Then we can enable it explicitly in testing script. -- Yujun On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:12 PM Ryota Mibu wrote: > Hi, > > > > I received a security review report for Doctor from Luke Hinds

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Weekly meeting for KVM enhancements for NFV for 9/15 is cancelled.

THE MEETING ON 9/15 IS CANCELLED ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story

Madhu - looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; Kunzmann, Gerald ;

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Volunteers Needed at OpenDaylight Summit

OPNFV Technical Community: For those of you planning to attend the OpenDaylight Summit, Sept 27-29 in Seattle , please consider volunteering some time to help represent OPNFV! Please direct any questions to eve...@opnfv.org and thank

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OVSNFV] Introduce OVS measurement results

Hi, After finishing the Colorado release, could you give me a time to introduce OVS measurement results with burstiness (microburst) in server side? It is the result at kernel OVS, but my concern is that it would be occurred at DPDK OVS. If there is the time slot, I’ll prepare abstract and some

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

+1 for this simple solution. On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:06 AM Christopher Price wrote: > I would suggest a simple rule is that a release candidate can only be > produced from the release branch. > ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] [Apex] Re: Some questions about OPNFV APEX

Thanks Ricky, I will do baremetal deployment so what are the answers in this case for question 1 and 2 ? Best regards, Ahmed On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto < rnori...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Ahmed, > > Adding opnfv-sfc and opnfv-apex mailing lists to share info to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] [Apex] Re: Some questions about OPNFV APEX

Hi Ahmed, Adding opnfv-sfc and opnfv-apex mailing lists to share info to everyone interested. On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Ahmed Medhat wrote: > Hi Ricky, > > I have some questions about deploying OPNFV APEX: > > 1- I read that I can use only one network for the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] security review

Hi, I received a security review report for Doctor from Luke Hinds today. It makes sense and we can change the Flask option easily, although we have to figure out the way to enhance the sample inspector and monitor in doctor tree.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

Hi Frank, I’m not sure the release date is realistic. Given the way we use stable branch in our CI and release processes it has been apparent that it takes around a week or more for the labels and artefacts to be generated from stable. I do think using a “window” for projects to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

Hi Chris, we can pull stable once projects are done with the work on the release (i.e. release criteria is met) – i.e. it does not have to be the release date itself, but whenever a project feels like “ready”. One week prior to the release sounds reasonable – assuming you know when you’ll

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

Hi +1 / Frank branching make sense for // development and probably for feature development but for integration/testing, we saw in Brahmaputra and in Colorado that we systematically cherry pick the only argument could be that we cherry pick with delay (1-2 days), so we check first on master then

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Nomations for the 2016 OPNFV Committer Board Election

Sorry if this is a re-hash of something already discussed... What is the criteria for generating the committer list? On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Raymond Paik wrote: > All, > > I'd like to start the nomination period for the OPNFV Committer Board > election.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] D-release schedule

Hi, There are different reasons why releng doesn't branch off. But one of the most important reasons is that branching off releng will cause having multiple versions of CI (jenkins jobs, associated scripts, and so on) which will greatly increase the complexity of the machinery we have and

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] [Apex] Re: Some questions about OPNFV APEX

I have 4 servers each one with one interface (1 will be JumpHost, 1 control nod, 2 compute nodes). On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto < rnori...@redhat.com> wrote: > How many servers do you have? > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Ahmed Medhat >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Nomations for the 2016 OPNFV Committer Board Election

Uli, Tapio thank you very much for the nomination. It is with regret I must decline due to new commitments in TSC I would like to back the nominations for Chris Price even if I would like to convince him to stay as TSC chair... /Morgan Le 13/09/2016 à 10:32, Tallgren, Tapio (Nokia - FI/Espoo) a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Security Article in linux.com

Nice! Congratulations to all involved. Dave. On 09/13/2016 08:00 AM, Luke Hinds wrote: > Nice write up on linux.com > > https://www.linux.com/blog/how-opnfv-earned-its-security-stripes-and-received-cii-best-practices-badge > > >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Does any one have updates for OPNFV VNFs avilable for on-boarding and testing

ok I move to the 29 no problem Morgan Le 13/09/2016 à 15:37, Carella, Giuseppe a écrit : > Hi Morgan, > > next week I’ll be at NFV#15, the week after would be better for me. > > Cheers, > Giuseppe > > Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in > Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/) > >> On 13

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Does any one have updates for OPNFV VNFs avilable for on-boarding and testing

We have VNF on boarding as an initial focus in Polestar, EUG and MANO WGs. We are gathering whoever can attend a meeting 12-3 at the ODL summit on thursday, 9/29. Anyone from functest attending this summit to join the discussions? Just don’t want to repeat anything that has already been done.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Does any one have updates for OPNFV VNFs avilable for on-boarding and testing

+1 wrt  + “Just don’t want to repeat anything that has already been done.” I would like to see that as:  “Do want to take advantage of proven best practices.”  J / Chris From: on behalf of Margaret Chiosi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Does any one have updates for OPNFV VNFs avilable for on-boarding and testing

of course - Morgan’s group is the gold star for best practices :-) > On Sep 13, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Christopher Price wrote: > > +1 > > wrt + “Just don’t want to repeat anything that has already been done.” > I would like to see that as: “Do want to take advantage of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] [Apex] Re: Some questions about OPNFV APEX

How many servers do you have? On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Ahmed Medhat wrote: > Thanks Ricky, > > I will do baremetal deployment so what are the answers in this case for > question 1 and 2 ? > > Best regards, > Ahmed > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Ricardo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Does any one have updates for OPNFV VNFs avilable for on-boarding and testing

Hi I put this point to the agenda of the meeting planned on the 22nd of September (2PM UTC) https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf I planned 20 minutes, is it OK? * *IRC channel:* |#opnfv-testperf| @ Freenode * Join the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Nomations for the 2016 OPNFV Committer Board Election

Luke, The committer list is from the committers in project INFO files. Hope that helps. Thanks, Ray On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Luke Hinds wrote: > Sorry if this is a re-hash of something already discussed... > > What is the criteria for generating the committer

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Committer Board Nomination

Hi Ray, I’d like to nominate myself for the committer board election. As TSC chair I have been an active board member, participating in a variety of board committees working with them on aligning and coordinating our collective efforts between the board and general community.  As I