[opnfv-tech-discuss] ZTE lab will be OFFLINE for 2 days

Hi all, We plan to install UPS in the lab at this weekend. So our pods (zte-pod1/zte-pod2/zte-pod3) will be influenced and powered off. We'll make them online again at next Monday(Aug.29). BR. Alex Yang Virtualization Shanghai System Dept D2033, ZTE Corporation, No.889 Bibo Road, PuDong D

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Bottlenecks] Minutes of Bottlenecks Discussion on August 25, 2016

Hi, Please find the minutes of Thursday's Bottlenecks meeting below and welcome to our next meeting! Thanks, Yang Minutes of Bottlenecks Discussion on August 25, 2016 * Date and Time * Thursday at 0100-0200

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail framwork

Hi all: We have discussed the dovetail test cases requirements and structure. And we will continue to discuss more. For the dovetail procedures, I would like to introduces the draft steps. 1) specify abstract architecture An abstract testing architecture provides a general framework within whi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]new topic- script for validating the test cases

Hi: I will put this on the dovetail agenda. Best Regards hongbo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of wang lei Sent: 2016年8月26日 9:50 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]ne

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]new topic- script for validating the test cases

scripts are the key to make sure that all these testcases work as an organic whole, i would like to participate in this topic, expect more discussion. BR Leo Wang On 2016/8/17 15:06, Tianhongbo wrote: Hi all dovetailers: The dovetail team are working on the test cases design, requirements fro

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] 8/1 agenda, project mappings and process proposal

8/1 or 9/1? On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:16 PM Margaret Chiosi < margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks: I created next thursday's agenda and inserted the updated the excel > spreadsheet mapping the OPNFV projects to the pain points and the new > initiatives as well as the ppt which listed a

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [announce] Change owners can now -1 to block merge of WIP

Hi Aric, I don't think Jenkins will give the +1 workflow, it is triggered by core reviewers. Jenkins slave only can give "±1 verified, +2 verified" When use workflow, normally, the range verified changed from ±1 to ±2 and set workflow +1 will trigger auto merge procedure in Gerrit. Currently i

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] 8/1 agenda, project mappings and process proposal

Folks: I created next thursday's agenda and inserted the updated the excel spreadsheet mapping the OPNFV projects to the pain points and the new initiatives as well as the ppt which listed a proposed process for polestar to follow. Feel free to give me comments and I will update the ppt/xlsx based

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [TestPerf] Today's meeting agenda

Added, as there is time. And I just got double booked with an urgent meeting, so I will need help driving the agenda. Regards, Mark Mark Beierl | Advisory Solutions Architect Communication & Media Cloud – CTO Office EMC Federation +1 (613) 314-8106 @MarkBeierl On Aug 25, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Davi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [TestPerf] Today's meeting agenda

Hi Mark, I have an action from the TSC to gather input on the following with the Test and CI teams: should "no-ha" scenarios be allowed to pass the deploy step by using a virtual environment, instead of bare metal? If you and the team agree, and if there's time, I'd like to add that to the agend

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [TestPerf] Today's meeting agenda

Hello all, and sorry for the late notice on an agenda for today’s meeting. I would like to propose the following * Action point follow-up (5') * Colorado test status (15') - teams present please give an update * Colorado test reporting overview - can someone give a highlight of what

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [daisy4nfv] Agenda for IRC meeting Aug. 26 2016

1) Roll Call 2) OPNFV CI Evolution Study Progress 3) Bare Metal Deployment(PXE/IPMI) Status Update 4) Bare Metal Related DB Development Status Update 5) Bifrost/Ironic Integration (does ironic provide all data we need?) B.R., Zhijiang ___ opnfv-tech-di

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs][doctor] Issue with "Adjust the structure of doctor/userguide dir" - any idea?

To help people getting a quick understanding of this issue, here is the summary. The document structure - docs/ - platformoverview/ - images/ - figure-p1.png - index.rst (include platformoverview.rst) - platformoverview.rst (include images/figures-p1.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs][doctor] Issue with "Adjust the structure of doctor/userguide dir" - any idea?

Dear Opnfvdocs-Team, We have an issue with this patch: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/18805/ Please refer to the history to see which things we had already tried to solve the issue with the figure numbering and the figure not showing. Does anyone have an idea what is the reason? Maybe an is