Opened a bug in Bugzilla:
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590
George
From: netvirt-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org
[mailto:netvirt-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:17 PM
To: netvirt-...@lists.op
Hi,
for developers working on JOID integration or interested in developing or
using charm for their projects or VNFs I would like recommend Juju
developer summit. It is a special, free, three day event being hosted in
Pasadena, California, USA. - Sept 12-14th 2016
Enjoy three days of Juju sessio
Hi, all. I have just set all the jira tasks for the C release as resolved.
So far, we have finished all the doc for the Colorado release, and stable
branch has been created. Thank you for all your hard work for this release.
Fu Qiao
China Mobile Research Institute
Network technology resear
Hi, Hongbo. Below are the HA test cases you asked about. The HA team
actually working with the yardstick team on these test cases. I think these
three are the test cases for the Colorado release. You mentioned that if we
could include these test cases in the dovetail project. I think that is a
grea
Hi Yi. Yes still using the vxlan workaround. The reason it never worked
before were due to known bugs in Tacker and ODL. Fixing those plus
accomodating new changes in Tacker/ODL to support OVS 2.5.90 took a while to
get it all working. Hopefully now we can move to doing Eth+NSH to SFs. That
Hi Binghan,
Moongen does support collection of latency stats so it just needs to be added
to VSPerf. We will add this as a JIRA ticket and advise you when its available.
Thanks.
-Christian,
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Trautman"
To: "Binghan"
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@l
Tim, great job, I guess this demo is still using vxlan workaround, right? My
question is why you couldn't successfully create multiple compute nodes with
Tacker before but you can now.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 2:38 AM
Hi Binghan,
Moongen in VSPerf does not currently collect latency stats. I will inquire with
the developers if this is planned in the near future and get back to you.
-Christian,
- Original Message -
From: "Binghan"
To: "MartinX Klozik"
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Se
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:41:46 -0700
Raymond Paik wrote:
> All,
>
> One of the topics discussed at the Q3 Hackfest last week was OPNFV
> mailing lists. After ~2 years, I think most will agree that the
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list in particular has become difficult to
> digest.
>
> The conse
Hey All.
I spoke with Sofia as well about this and presented our NetReady situation. We
have a document that covers what we wanted to cover for Phase 1 (targeting C
release) of the NetReady Requirements Project. We now want to stop internally
editing it and release it for comment – and the th
Bryan,
Was the VNF On boarding with Cloudify "hello world sample" was a Model
project that can be linked or tagged as MANO participation task?
I thought we had another one from Giuseppe for MANO API testing with
Yardstick/Functets that was part of "Orchestra".
Another one was VES for metada
No, there was no meeting as no one showed up :(...
I also don't know of any discussions around onboarding yet. That's a to-do for
the MANO WG I think.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
From: Prakash Ramchandran [mailto:prakash.ramchand...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:03 PM
To: SULLIV
I think there is another option which we discussed at the hackfest (and for
which I have a pending action) and that is to publish a “future work” section
of our release library that describes more where our community is heading thatn
what we have delivered.
Let me see if I can get a patch to
Hi Daniel,
We've had some discussion about this in various meetings, including
hackfest, over the past several weeks. The question is: does it make sense
for requirements projects to participate in releases until they're ready to
deliver code? It's not clear to me that there's any advantage to e
Dave,
http://www.aha.io
Aha! is roadmapping software for PMs who want their mojo back
I b e n
> On Aug 30, 2016, at 10:30, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 08/30/2016 12:24 PM, Min Yu wrote:
>>AoB (Aha! License)
>>
>> o
>>Margaret is waiting for Heather to approve the purc
Hi,
On 08/30/2016 12:24 PM, Min Yu wrote:
> AoB (Aha! License)
>
> o
> Margaret is waiting for Heather to approve the purchase of Aha!
> license.
What is Aha!, and why do we need a license to it? What does it do?
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strate
Hey David and Sofia.
In the NetReady group, we have structured our documentation and commits for our
C-release documentation in RST format/doc guidelines under the auspices that
this was required so that when the DOCS are generated for the release,
requirements and documentation projects delive
Attendees: Anthony Soong, Margaret Chiosi, Michael Bugenhagen, Pierre
Lynch, Steven Wright, Uli Kleber, Yunjun Zhang
Minutes
-
Previous Minutes/Agenda: approved
-
Review Template for User Stories from Openstack (Shamil)
-
Please send Shamil’s email address to Margaret if y
Hi all,
Here is the summary of discussions at OPNFV Hackfest at Toronto on MANO issues.
https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111
refer to Agenda & Summary of meeting 8/24/2016 in the link above.
Would like to get feedback from PTLs on MNAO activities being tagged in JIRA
by
Hi Binghan,
Could you please sent us following info?
* what traffic generator you use
* your vsperf configuration
* full test output
In general these values are reported by traffic generator and the level of
implementation might be different among supported traffic generators. It would
be good
Hi Luke,
The point I'm trying to make is that when the work covers one change we don't
need multiple commits and JIRA issues per file.
Two examples I've seen this happening:
1) s/brahmaputra/colorado/ (in docs, for instance)
2) adding license headers
I think these are good examples that we
Hi VSPERF experts,
I am trying to use VSPERF to benchmark OVS performance.
I use default configuration, but no matter I run PVP test or P2P test, the
latency result is always 0. Do I need to configure anything special to
enable latency test?
BRs,
Binghan
[INFO ] 2016-08-26 22:00:15,727 : (root
Hi Carlos,
Are we sure its not a process the PTL may prefer? I find some folk don't
like commits that cover more then one change, and instead prefer a
single jira / commit to be used, even piecemeal for small changes.
To digress though, Open Source projects do have a lot of cases of people
bendin
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for bringing this up to the list but it came to my attention some
time ago now of a continued practice carried by some contributors/committers
that I don't think we as community would like to continue supporting, not to
say tolerant. I'm talking about commit counts for the s
Hi Chris
First of all it seems that we aim the same target, and that is a good start, :)
Word "engine" hides too many details, and i want to make it more clear to see
every parts of this tool chain instead of a big black box putting all stuff
in.So maybe something else would be appropriate, a
Thanks for the contribution, Al!
The results are in millisec, will fix that (among other things).
N.
-Original Message-
From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [mailto:acmor...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 2:45 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Nikos Anastopoulos
(nanas...@in
Hi Leo,
Looking at the diagram I might have expected to see things a little
differently, it may just be representation but let’s discuss some points to see
if we are on the same page.
“Parser” -> rename to “dovetail engine” or something this is where all the
dovetail specific stuff needs
Hi Gerald, all,
I like that idea and it would work for me: It allows to indicate to release
management that an item is being worked on outside of a release and gives the
individual projects more flexibility in defining non-release related tasks.
Best regards
Georg
From: opnfv-project-leads-bou
Hi,
Thanks a lot for this recognition. I think many other contributors who have
been working hard deserve this award as well. You are making OPNFV an exciting
journey. It’s fun working with you!
Jose
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.op
Hi Chris, all,
What about introducing another label "non-release" and allowing (as David had
mentioned in his other email) the use of alternative label for specific
"non-release related" topics.
I understand David's concern that we should be able to identify issues that are
not assigned with a
My previous experience was to track only stories and bugs against a release.
Sub-tasks are always associated with a specific story and tracked that way.
As for tasks, those usually indicate out of band (ie: non release) work that is
to be done.
Just my $0.02...
Regards,
Mark
On Aug 30, 2016
Hello all
We have written a document to guide how to call Chinese name.
feel free to read and comment on it, thanks a lot
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-deng-chinese-names-04.txt
DENG Hui
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.o
Hi Chris
Glad to see your attention, and your great question.
I would like to discuss this architecture with anyone in which who interested
to improve the approach. May be on the dovetail weekly meeting or any proper
circumstance.
I choose the docker to pack all dovetail stuff into a image
33 matches
Mail list logo
