Hi,
Shall we have it on Tuesday next week? We haven't had a call for a few weeks
already.
Best regards,
Arturo
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 9:16 PM
To: opnfv-t
Hi Rozet,
Please find the attached network settings file.
I had installed and provisioned the OPNFV target system to VM nodes based on
the user guide (i.e section: Installation Guide - Virtual Deployment )
Below options/parameters are used while running opnfv-deploy:
sudo opnfv-deploy -v --v
I agree, the thing to solve here is for the purely openstack activities we want
to perform on the VIM.
Looking at areas like access connectivity and distributed cloud technologies
these are capabilities that will most likely require more than an OpenStack
northbound interface from the VIM. T
Yes,you are right, the “TestSuite” here covers whole set of all dovetail test
cases
The value of this “TestSuite” should be consist with the names of lists that
mentioned in this patch,like “compliance_set" , “proposed_tests"
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23843/
On Nov 17, 2016, at 14:
About the heat of openstackclient, I may need to clarify
There are two ways of leveraging python-openstackclient.
One way is using the shell call to fire the command and it takes care of
plugins including heat, which means heat is able to be used.
Plugins are listed here:
https://github.com/open
Wenjuan,
A README for the overview of your design would help reviewers to understand
the huge chunk of code.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:33 PM wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I agree that we should discuess more about how to refactor the test script
> to let it become more modular, readable and maintain
“TestSuite: basic”
Maybe I am reading the sample in a different way, but the title above, to me,
seems to show it is citing an area “basic” out of the whole set of all dovetail
test cases. If you do intend to mean the whole test suite, then maybe a better
name would be “Colorado”?
Like this:
Hi All,
I agree that we should discuess more about how to refactor the test script
to let it become more modular, readable and maintainable.
The programming languages is the first step.
I propsed a framwork about the refactor the test script[1].
This is my init ideal, any comments are welcome.
Thanks, Bryan.
Part of me was afraid someone was going to point out this (rather obvious)
position. The "afraid" comes only from my perspective of not knowing how to go
about doing this correctly (i.e. upstream) and lack of overall knowledge of the
OpenStack client itself that makes me feel li
Hi, doctors,
Carlos has started code refactoring of the test script[1]. It looks good to
separate common function and installer specific function into different
modules and improve the readability of main script.[2][3]
I just have some concerns about the future complexibility of this test
script.
I would say that:
1) We should strive to directly leverage upstream clients directly, and
specifically the python-openstackclient in all cases where it serves our need
for the specific OPNFV system version.
a. Exceptions do exist, but we will not help promote removal of those
except
test case management may have 3 levels like this:
TestSuite — TestArea — TestCase
So as the report, it is better to show the test suite in the summary part
and show test area, test case in details
Otherwise for one test suite, it will produce multiple reports showing each
test area,
i think th
Suggest “TestSuite” -> “TestArea”… for consistency and to reserve Suite for
broader concept.
Wenjing
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Leo Wang
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 6:27 PM
To: Christopher Price ; Zhang
Hello Gerald,
FYI, Thursday Nov 24th is Thanksgiving holiday here in the US. I doubt anyone
from the US will be on the call.
Regards
-Madhu
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi Patrick,
In Apex, configuring bonds is not supported yet. It is possible in TripleO and
with some advanced config you could use a workaround, but for now let's just
focus on getting the deployment to work. When you execute the deployment (use
--debug arg to opnfv-deploy), can you console in
Hi Vishy,
Can you please send me your network settings file?
Thanks,
Tim Rozet
Red Hat SDN Team
- Original Message -
From: "Vishwanath Paraddi"
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 9:16:08 AM
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV/APEX Colorado Installati
Here's a topic I brought up at the Infra meeting today, that I've added to the
Hackfest Planning page
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page
This was inspired by the OpenStack summit CI/CD Fishbowl session
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BCN-ops-ci-cd-wor
Ok I reproduced your suggestions but still have the same problem.
Here are my flows on compute node 0:http://hastebin.com/xusotunamu.lua
Here are my flows on compute node 1: http://hastebin.com/tayosaxenu.go
Here are my flows on Controller: http://hastebin.com/sutapaloqe.lua
Here are my security
Here [0] are the minutes from todays meeting.
Regards,
Brady
[0]
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-16-14.59.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opn
Yes I tested both scenarios (server w/ last SF and server w/o last SF).
Can you please try to reproduce the suggestions I made and report the results?
Regardless it should be interesting to see if any of these have an impact on
the test.
Thanks,
George
From: Ahmed Medhat [mailto:a.medha..
Starting a new thread to discuss the common code repository concept.
The link Jose sent [1] does not appear to contain any code, so perhaps that
link is not correct. Either way, I would like to know if there is
documentation on how to use (import from within a Jenkins build, deploy, etc)
as we
Hi George,
Thanks for reply.
I am using OPNFV APEX Colorado which is based on ODL Boron.
I checked my security groups, it looks like that:
http://hastebin.com/akibozuciv.rb
Regarding the Iptables, I did not configured it. I think that should be
done by APEX automatically.
I have the chain works
Hello,
Lets talk about the following today:
1 - Test running in master, although there is an external problem which
made it fail once
2 - Tests moved to sfc repo
3 - Status of the merge to Colorado stable
4 - Tacker fix committed for tackerclient version
5 - Performance issues
6 - Status of F
Hi Ahmed,
I reproduced your environment and run the test and it works fine for me.
Here are the system info in detail:
- Controller ovs-vsctl: http://hastebin.com/tibanukeqe.scala
- Controller flows: http://hastebin.com/ekeriwofib.lua
- Compute1 ovs-vsctl: http:/
Hi Morgan,
Thank you for your clarification. This help a lot for me.
To finish the test case selection work, I think maybe we should firstly create
a table for the scenario owners to modify the test case configuration in the
DB, and then offer an API for scenario owners to modify this table.
I
Hello, team,
Dimitri will be absent, let's have a short conversation on:
Agenda of Nov.17 2016
* KB feature implementation
* Funstest dependency issue and Kingbird test
IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting 8:00-9:00 UTC (During
winter time, means CET 9:00 AM). Other topics
Correct :)
From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:26 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ;
opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[multisite][NetReady]FYI, Tricircle now is
one of OpenStack Big-Tent project
Hi, Gerg0,
Thank
Hi, Gerg0,
Thank you too. You are fast enough, but my time is UTC+8, the earth helps me my
time is earlier than you :)
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 16 November 2016 16:20
To: j
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
E
Hi,
Okay, you were faster and I process my mails in FILO :)
Br,
Gerg0
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of joehuang
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:50 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [[mul
Hi,
Tricircle [1] become an official OpenStack project. This project targets
similar use cases as the Georedundancy use cases [2] from the requirements
document.
[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle#Use_Cases
[2]:
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html#geore
31 matches
Mail list logo
