[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

Hi all: I have a suggestion: Can we use this kind of categories: 1) outstanding committers 2) outstanding contributors 3) outstanding PTL 4) innovation awards 5) Community support/leadership this kind of categories may encourage more people to act as the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

The category looks good. I think we may need publish key indicators and selection process for these awards to make it open and transparent. Not sure there is already some policy defined by TSC. My two cents. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM Raymond Paik wrote: >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

That's correct... On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Yujun Zhang (ZTE) wrote: > less frequently => do you mean from every quarter to each release? > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:21 AM Raymond Paik > wrote: > >> Reviving the discussion after the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Summary of the February Board meeting

Hi OPNFV, The Board meeting for Feb took place on Feb. 2nd . Please find a summary of the meeting below. * 2016 recap and year ahead: There was a review of 2016 accomplishments such as Brahmaputra/Colorado releases, Summit, Plugfests, launch of the End User Advisory Group, etc. Next,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [openretriever]Actions for container integrated with NFV

Hi OpenRetrieverer: Last meeting, we decided some actions in below: #1 Write requirement document for Installer to integrate essential openstack components. Create a task : https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/CONTAINER-1 #2 Using ansible playbook to deploy a

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]Weekly meeting of Feb.9

Hello, team, Agenda of Feb.9 2017 * (MS6) Test cases implemented, preliminary documentation completed, and stable branch open * Multisite deployment environment. * Kingbird feature development. * Open discussion IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting 8:00-9:00 UTC (During

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

Reviving the discussion after the Chinese New Year holidays... I wanted to propose the following new categories. Also, since we're doing these awards less frequently we can award more than one person in each category (shown in numbers in parentheses). - Code development (3) - Community

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Following up on the committer removal process discussion

All, Following up on an earlier discussion on the TSC call. First, changes to the TSC Charter do require a Board approval. We did this about two years ago for a minor wording change. Once the TSC agrees on the new text, the TSC Chair can present to the Board for a vote. Secondly, I looked at

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] OVS events plugin behaviour

Thanks Maryam. Since you mentioned options / config :)When a common model is chosen (VES / OpenConfig / etc...), will Collectd be open to having dynamic configuration using that model? Araon On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Tahhan, Maryam wrote: > Or at least

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] OVS events plugin behaviour

Or at least to allow the option to disable polling... you might want both for an out of band update :) > -Original Message- > From: Tahhan, Maryam > Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 6:56 PM > To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Aaron Smith > Cc: Mcmahon, Tony B

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] OVS events plugin behaviour

Hi Aaron and folks I was wrong about the ovs polling configuration being optional, It looks like the ovs events plugin does register for link status updates, but it also is polling on a regular interval... so based on the discussion today I will add a feature request to add a configuration

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV

Hi OPNFV, over the past few weeks we've distilled two proposals to add analytics and more diagnostic capabilities to OPNFV and OPNFV scenarios. We've published the two new project proposals on the wiki: * Bamboo: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Project+Proposal *

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL SFC with single compute node and OVS 2.6.1 NSH patches

Hi Brady, While adding SFC and SFC Classifier, I can't see any valid errors in karaf.log. Anyways, I am pasting WARN and ERROR logs of sfc in the below link: Karaf warning messages: http://pastebin.com/PCa4QFft Karaf error messages: http://pastebin.com/34CmBjZW But, some of the karaf logs are

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] Documentation update for Danube release

Hi Morgan, Yes – I think this is the best place since it is common for all testing groups. BR, Sofia From: morgan.richo...@orange.com [mailto:morgan.richo...@orange.com] Sent: den 7 februari 2017 16:19 To: Sofia Wallin ; Kunzmann, Gerald ;

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] Asia / Pacific release meeting begins TODAY

Team, Today (Feb 7) is the first Asia / Pacific release meeting. This meeting is intended to help APAC OPNFV members that have a difficult time attending the regular weekly release meeting due to time zone differences. The meeting will be held every other Tuesday at 7:30-8:00 p.m. (PST - 11:30

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] Documentation update for Danube release

Hi Sofia For Danube, the testing group initiated an umbrella doc, currently hosted in opnfvdocs/docs/testing/ecosystem is it OK? Morgan Le 07/02/2017 à 15:49, Sofia Wallin a écrit : > > Hi Gerald, > > The documentation is divided into 3 different entry points/areas so > the structure will

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] Documentation update for Danube release

Hi Gerald, The documentation is divided into 3 different entry points/areas so the structure will look as following, /docs/release /configguide /installation /release-notes /scenarios └── scenario.name /userguide /docs/developer

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Doctor weekly meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Los_Angeles BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Doctor weekly meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Los_Angeles BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL SFC with single compute node and OVS 2.6.1 NSH patches

Srikanth, The reason wget works and doesnt send packets to the VM is because your classification rule (pasted below) matches on srcPort=2000 and dstPort=80, but you dont specify the srcPort with wget, so the packets dont match classification, and subsequently dont get sent to SFC (hence

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ODL SFC with single compute node and OVS 2.6.1 NSH patches

Hi, My setup includes: * One Openstack Controller with ODL (of course with SFC) which is deployed through OPNFV Colorado 3.0 * One aarch64 Compute Node (OpenStack Mitaka), which is attached to the above OS Controller I downloaded OVS 2.6.1 from OVS git hub and applied NSH