Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] MS1 - Release Plan - Sept 30 #release #iruya

[David McBride]

+TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV   +James Baker


On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:44 PM David McBride 
wrote:

> Thanks for your interest in participating in the OPNFV Iruya release.  MS1
> is coming up on Sept 30.  Please submit your release plan here
> .
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> David
>
> --
> *David McBride*
> Release Manager
> Linux Foundation Networking (LFN)
> Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
> Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
> IRC: dmcbride
>


-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager
Linux Foundation Networking (LFN)
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
IRC: dmcbride
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#23547): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23547
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/34139243/21656
Mute #release: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=release=2783016
Mute #iruya: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=iruya=2783016
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] MS1 - Intent-to-participate / OPNFV Iruya - Sept 30 #release #iruya

[David McBride]

Team,

The intent-to-participate window for the compressed Iruya release closes on
Sept 30.  Please submit your intent-to-participate notification prior to
Sept 30.  Note that Sept 30 is also the deadline for release plans.

if you are not intending to participate in the release, it would be helpful
if you would respond to this email to let me know.

Let me know if you have any questions.

David

-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager
Linux Foundation Networking (LFN)
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
IRC: dmcbride
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#23546): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23546
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/34139220/21656
Mute #release: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=release=2783016
Mute #iruya: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=iruya=2783016
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Reminder: NSMCon CFP Closes Today

[Brandon Wick]

OPNFV Community,

The Network Service Mesh  project is holding
a co-located event at KueCon + CloudNativeCon NA called NSMCon
. The CFP is due today

.

Best,

Brandon Wick
Senior Integrated Marketing Manager
The Linux Foundation
bw...@linuxfoundation.org
+1.917.282.0960
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#23545): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23545
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/34129431/21656
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 11 Sep 2019 (ww111)

[Al Morton]

Hi Pierre,

Thanks for your question:

  *   You indicate testing of parallel VMs or pods. Where is that required? I 
haven’t seen that implied anywhere…
Since the exposed metrics are composed as “per VNF-C” and others,
there may be a linear range of throughput per XXX, where for example

   Throughput(two VM) = 2 x Throughput(one VM)

up to some threshold of parallel VMs, and above that limit
some other relationship exists. So you’re right that no one
said (yet) that we have to test in this way, but I’m thinking
ahead to reporting the results with a range of applicability.
Obviously, configuration influences the relationships, too.

This dialog is about clarifying the specifications, and we
can see from your questions that some clarification is needed
whether the exposed performance metrics cite a standard like TST009,
or not (applies to all your remaining questions, on max flows
and other aspects).

regards,
Al


From: Pierre Lynch [mailto:pierre.ly...@keysight.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 1:09 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Cc: sridhar@spirent.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 11 Sep 2019 
(ww111)

Hi Al,

I’ve taken a quick look at the wiki page, and have a few questions:


  *   You indicate testing of parallel VMs or pods. Where is that required? I 
haven’t seen that implied anywhere…
  *   Same question for bi-directional testing…

As for the table 4-4 in the CNTT document (I guess these questions are more for 
the authors, just thought I would bring them up here)


  *   For the max simultaneous flows metric, would the max be determined by the 
“next” one dropping, or by misbehavior of the existing flows (ie. Higher 
latency)
  *   For the max new flow rate, I have always thought that was more of a 
control plane test (ie. TCP in this case). Is that part of NFVI?
  *   Network latency is defined as “round trip”. I am guessing they mean the 
packet is sent to the NFVI by the test device, NFVI switches it back out  and 
then it’s received by the test device? I’ve always looked at that as a 
unidirectional test (end to end) because it’s sent by one end and received by 
one other end.


Thanks,

Pierre



From: 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> 
on behalf of "Sridhar K. N. Rao via Lists.Opnfv.Org" 
mailto:sridhar.rao=spirent@lists.opnfv.org>>
Reply-To: "sridhar@spirent.com" 
mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 10:34 PM
To: "a...@research.att.com" 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 11 Sep 2019 
(ww111)


[EXTERNAL]
Thanks, Al.
Will work on implementation plan. Once we have better clarity, we can start 
discussion with CNTT-RI

Regards
Sridhar

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> 
On Behalf Of Al Morton via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: 12 September 2019 04:28
To: Rao, Sridhar mailto:sridhar@spirent.com>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] VSPERF weekly meeting - 11 Sep 2019 
(ww111)

On Item 5. I took an action
to create a new page describing
the CNTT-VSPERF tests that require
some more development.

So, here’s the first draft:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vsperf/CNTT+and+VSPERF

Al

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Sridhar K. N. Rao
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 4:58 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>>; 'Trevor Cooper' 
mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; 'Mars Toktonaliev 
(Nokia - US/Irving)' 
mailto:mars.toktonal...@nokia.com>>; Christian 
Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com) 
mailto:ctrau...@redhat.com>>; Alec Hothan (ahothan)