[mailto:vlingadaha...@mvista.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 6:44 AM
To: Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>
Cc: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com>;
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia <pkanau...@mvista
art tacker-server.service: Unit
tacker-server.service not found.
So we need to change the way the symlink to the service is created
BR,
George
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
S
half Of
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:24 AM
To: Veena Lingadahalli <vlingadaha...@mvista.com>; Serg Melikyan
<smelik...@mirantis.com>; Tim Rozet <tro...@redhat.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia <pkanau...@mvista.com>
Subject: Re
Hi all,
I'm trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I'm getting the
following error:
(/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not
functional on this host
Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd
instead of 14.04
To: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com>
Cc: brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com; Paraskevopoulos Georgios
<geo...@intracom-telecom.com>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org;
opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org; Veena Lingadahalli <vlingadaha...@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan]
.domain.tld
Can you look into it?
Thanks,
George
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 2:15 PM
To: Michael Polenchuk <mpolenc...@mirantis.com>; Manuel Bu
, January 27, 2017 5:06 PM
To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com>
Cc: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com>; opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org;
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Veena Lingadahalli
<vlingadaha...@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel
Ok I’ll wait a bit for a Fuel 10 patch.
Thanks for your help,
George
From: Michael Polenchuk [mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 5:34 PM
To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com>
Cc: Manuel Buil <mb...@suse.com>; opnfv-us...@lis
ide me how to
create a private network?
Thanks,
George
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 5:39 PM
To: Michael Polenchuk <mpolenc...@mirantis.com>
Cc:
Hi all,
I want to bring this back to life. In CI healtcheck is failing for SFC scenario
because the instances fail to get an IP from DHCP agent [0]
In contrast for the BGPVPN scenario healthcheck works [1]. It seems to me they
are running a different flavor of healthcheck
Michael: Is
Correction. Same healthcheck btw 2 scenarios, It was just buried in the logs
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:57 PM
To: Michael Polenchuk <mpol
Hi all,
I am encountering the same problem in Fuel 10. Do we have any news on this?
Thanks,
George
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Polenchuk
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 9:25 PM
To: Veena
I tested today autorelease 1477 manually and I confirm that SSH via floating
IPs works.
Link:
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/autorelease-1477/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.5.0-Boron/
BR,
George Paraskevopoulos
-Original Message-
From: Tim Rozet
Hi team,
I am currently working with the OPNFV SFC team and I am currently testing the
OpenDaylight Boron RC1 release.
The testcase I am running is the following:
Hi Manuel,
I'd like to take one of SFC-53 / SFC-55. Also I can take SFC-52.
BR,
George
-Original Message-
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Buil
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 6:13 PM
To: Brady
Hi Ahmed,
I reproduced your environment and run the test and it works fine for me.
Here are the system info in detail:
- Controller ovs-vsctl: http://hastebin.com/tibanukeqe.scala
- Controller flows: http://hastebin.com/ekeriwofib.lua
- Compute1 ovs-vsctl:
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 5:06 PM
To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Cc: Manuel Buil; Brady Allen Johnson; Tim Rozet; OPNFV Tech
Subject: Re: OPNFV Apex colorado SFC
Hi George,
Thanks for reply.
I am using OPNFV APEX Colorado which is based on ODL Boron.
I checked my security
Hi all,
Late bird here :)
I agree with Juan. Morgan's proposal is what we'll get to eventually, but it's
a bit early to establish a rigid naming scheme.
Until we have more tests that cover a larger amount of cases I think more
descriptive names is the way to go.
Also, limiting the
Hi,
I just tested and I'm getting the same problem with the latest container (I do
docker pull opnfv/functest :latest) and the tip master branch
BR,
George
From: Jose Lausuch [mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 5:43 PM
To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <
Performance Profiling presentation available here
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByKmzUuCWRteZjlsZTZWUU1CRGc
BR,
George
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen
Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, November 30,
Hi Srikanth,
I would try switching to Boron SR2 (0.5.2)
BR,
George
From: Srikanth Lingala [mailto:srikanth.ling...@nxp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 9:33 AM
To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios <geo...@intracom-telecom.com>; Brady Allen Johnson
<brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com>
Hi Srikanth,
Which ODL version are you using? We had some issues too in Colorado with
multicompute setups.
BR,
George
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen
Johnson
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017
22 matches
Mail list logo
