) use the REST API of FUNCTEST/YARDSTICK with SSL to make sure that these
results are just existing in secured transportation and saved to db, and then
no one can touch them.
This is a very primitive workaround, so welcome everyone to contribute your idea
BR
Leo Wang
<http://www.linkedin.
we should focus on a specific scope, and i
will remove SDN/VNF related information to make it more clear.
BR
Leo Wang
On 2016/8/29 18:08, Christopher Price wrote:
Hi Leo,
Thanks for starting to sketch this out.
On the architecture I think it would be worth a discussion with the test
these terms constantly
Welcome recommendations and comments.
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Terminology
BR
Leo Wang
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv
org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=149
BR
Leo Wang
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
- -
tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_port
fail
- -
tempest.api.network.test_networks.BulkNetworkOpsIpV6Test.test_bulk_create_delete_subnet
pass
Welcome to share your ideas within the mailing list or the wiki page
https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/editpage.action?pageId=8685074
BR
Leo Wang
this is not the common way to organize the report
BR
Leo Wang
On Nov 17, 2016, at 06:33, Wenjing Chu
<wenjing@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing@huawei.com>> wrote:
Suggest “TestSuite” -> “TestArea”… for consistency and to reserve Suite for
broader concept.
Wenjing
From:
opn
you do intend to mean the whole test suite, then maybe a better
name would be “Colorado”?
Like this:
Version: 1.0
TestSuite: Colorado
Certify ID: 9b2a4144-21f8-7c2a-987b-8f2c125c2df2
…
-Wenjing
From: Leo Wang [mailto:grakiss...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 5:00 PM
To
Hi Yujun, Chris
I suggest that add a segment for each test case in their definition scripts to
explicitly tell this info
then the tool can generate the report in a general way
BR
Leo Wang
On Nov 15, 2016, at 17:42, Christopher Price
<chrispric...@gmail.com<mailto:chrispric...@gma
deal,content is the essential, we may adjust these
concrete style in any time.
BR
Leo Wang
On Nov 15, 2016, at 17:39, Christopher Price
<chrispric...@gmail.com<mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Leo,
Thanks for getting the ball rolling on this. I don’t want to hack at t
ed knowledge, a user can only sign the result with his own
private key. It is not possible for him to modify a report signed by let's say
OPNFV release bot and kept the original signature.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:38 PM Leo Wang
<grakiss...@hotmail.com<mailto:grakiss...@hotmail.com>&
the result right after the result being generated then sign the
result
how to tell whether the result is the original one or not ?
BR
Leo Wang
On Jan 13, 2017, at 06:08, Lincoln Lavoie
<lylav...@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>> wrote:
Hi Leo,
It may be worth separating th
to
make it more secure?
we can take that into consideration, thank you for your two cents, :)
BR
Leo Wang
On Dec 27, 2016, at 14:29, Yujun Zhang
<zhangyujun+...@gmail.com<mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I thought report is normally public to read.
But it is important to
Encryption or signature or certificate do have different role in this big
picture,
It can be done step by step.
On Dec 27, 2016, at 16:01, Yujun Zhang
<zhangyujun+...@gmail.com<mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:54 PM Leo Wang
<grakiss
lpful for
understanding the dovetail.
https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=7766287
[cid:18558D75-3976-470D-8537-D4F30535983E]
BR
Leo Wang
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/ma
/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Test+Result+Database
BR
Leo Wang
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
+1
Leo Wang
On Jun 26, 2017, at 16:34, Georg Kunz
<georg.k...@ericsson.com<mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi Dovetailers,
You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case scope
and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the committe
+1
From: Georg Kunz <georg.k...@ericsson.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:37 PM
To: Dave Neary; Cooper, Trevor; Wenjing Chu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Tianhongbo; z...@redhat.com; Fu Qiao; Leo Wang; 'Lincoln Lavoie'; Jose
Lausuch
S
Hi wenjing
I was working on the "Tagging / releases, offline support" for the last few
weeks,
i think i can make some progress on that
BR
Leo Wang
From: Wenjing Chu <wenjing@huawei.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 11:14 PM
To: op
mework
And if we do that on HA, then the structure of this doc is different from
VPN/IPV6/..., we may need to either modify the description of other test suites
or keep the difference.
I am not sure whether i fully understand your point, so expect your reply
BR
Le
+1
LeoWang
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
on behalf of Tianhongbo
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 11:13 AM
To: Wenjing Chu; Tianhongbo; Dave Neary; Georg Kunz;
20 matches
Mail list logo