Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
No you got it right – I didn’t do that good of job of putting it together so you did great. One thing I completely missed is that a “implementation use case” consider the system an “actor” so we have to identify the frameworks in the actor as part of the use case. i.e. – we have to identify the underlying management framework as I put in the prior message. It probably would have been nice if I started off with that ☺ - my apologies for the choppy response. Best regards, Mike From: "Kunzmann, Gerald" Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 8:53 AM To: "Bugenhagen, Michael K" , "Kashyap, Madhu" , "Gangur, Hrushikesh" , Arturo Martin De Nicolas , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: "Souville, Bertrand" , "Thulasi, Arun" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Mike, Your thoughts are highly valuable and appreciated. Isn’t the current OpenStack already the platform / environment that we are talking about? I agree that the platform providers’ interest is to create a common framework that fits as many users as possible. Isn’t it then now the stage to write down our specific Telco use cases and based on that identify the gaps and let the “innovative program coders” expand the(ir) platform to meet our use cases? Also, the PWG has already defined this kind of template/approach and somehow if we want to bring our use cases/requirements through the PWG we should follow it. It would be a different story and we would need to include the PWG folks if we want to fundamentally question/change their approach proposing a different value path. Or did I mis-read your message? Best regards, Gerald From: Bugenhagen, Michael K [mailto:michael.k.bugenha...@centurylink.com] Sent: Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 15:32 To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Kashyap, Madhu ; Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Gerald, I’m going to suggest a slightly different “value” path - First establish what the framework for delivering capacity is - THEN see if one can use it to satisfy the use cases, and identify the gaps. In compute, and Cloud when one makes a platform / Environment, you don’t do a use case on every application that can be made, you document the platform, and how it functions and then you let the innovative program coders expand how to use it. i.e. – you expose a framework, they utilize it. The role of the platform provider is to evolve and maintain a common framework that works for all the users… vs. trying to build every single user story In a closed system dev. View one does create all the system use, cases – in Open platforms / OS efforts we’re really more focused enabling the environment / platform vs. depicting all the users stories. So – I would recommend identifying the “frameworks” for “resource management” and “use management” in both the Telecom bearer path, and the Cloud service platforms “first” and then use those frameworks to describe what can be done, and what gaps exist. Example a) What are the “components” (resource levels) or entities we are applying use control (CAC) to b) Identify what “utilization frameworks” do those components use c) Identify the “load sharing / dedicated” resource schema those components use (what are the algorithms used across the resource entity for weighted, dedicated, or shared use). Providers “do this” when designing our platform design. Aka - QoS marking built for QoE goals.. in our forwarding plane q’s. We need to do the same exercise here. What are the QoS mechanisms in Cloud, and how are they applied to reach what you are describing. I think the framework itself is going to be a tricky thing because different NFVI hosts have different resource and use algorithms… Anyway – just sharing my thoughts. Thanks, Mike From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of "Kunzmann, Gerald" mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>> Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 5:38 AM To: "Kashyap, Madhu" mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>, "Gangur, Hrushikesh" mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>, Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Cc: "Souville, Bertrand" mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>, "Thulasi, Arun" mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, I agree with the increase of complexity. Looking at the other use cases, they ar
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Hi Mike, Okay. thanks for confirming. Do you plan to collect some initial input on identifying the underlying management framework? Have a nice weekend. Best regards, Gerald From: Bugenhagen, Michael K [mailto:michael.k.bugenha...@centurylink.com] Sent: Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 16:09 To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Kashyap, Madhu ; Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story No you got it right – I didn’t do that good of job of putting it together so you did great. One thing I completely missed is that a “implementation use case” consider the system an “actor” so we have to identify the frameworks in the actor as part of the use case. i.e. – we have to identify the underlying management framework as I put in the prior message. It probably would have been nice if I started off with that ☺ - my apologies for the choppy response. Best regards, Mike From: "Kunzmann, Gerald" Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 8:53 AM To: "Bugenhagen, Michael K" , "Kashyap, Madhu" , "Gangur, Hrushikesh" , Arturo Martin De Nicolas , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: "Souville, Bertrand" , "Thulasi, Arun" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Mike, Your thoughts are highly valuable and appreciated. Isn’t the current OpenStack already the platform / environment that we are talking about? I agree that the platform providers’ interest is to create a common framework that fits as many users as possible. Isn’t it then now the stage to write down our specific Telco use cases and based on that identify the gaps and let the “innovative program coders” expand the(ir) platform to meet our use cases? Also, the PWG has already defined this kind of template/approach and somehow if we want to bring our use cases/requirements through the PWG we should follow it. It would be a different story and we would need to include the PWG folks if we want to fundamentally question/change their approach proposing a different value path. Or did I mis-read your message? Best regards, Gerald From: Bugenhagen, Michael K [mailto:michael.k.bugenha...@centurylink.com] Sent: Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 15:32 To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Kashyap, Madhu ; Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Gerald, I’m going to suggest a slightly different “value” path - First establish what the framework for delivering capacity is - THEN see if one can use it to satisfy the use cases, and identify the gaps. In compute, and Cloud when one makes a platform / Environment, you don’t do a use case on every application that can be made, you document the platform, and how it functions and then you let the innovative program coders expand how to use it. i.e. – you expose a framework, they utilize it. The role of the platform provider is to evolve and maintain a common framework that works for all the users… vs. trying to build every single user story In a closed system dev. View one does create all the system use, cases – in Open platforms / OS efforts we’re really more focused enabling the environment / platform vs. depicting all the users stories. So – I would recommend identifying the “frameworks” for “resource management” and “use management” in both the Telecom bearer path, and the Cloud service platforms “first” and then use those frameworks to describe what can be done, and what gaps exist. Example a) What are the “components” (resource levels) or entities we are applying use control (CAC) to b) Identify what “utilization frameworks” do those components use c) Identify the “load sharing / dedicated” resource schema those components use (what are the algorithms used across the resource entity for weighted, dedicated, or shared use). Providers “do this” when designing our platform design. Aka - QoS marking built for QoE goals.. in our forwarding plane q’s. We need to do the same exercise here. What are the QoS mechanisms in Cloud, and how are they applied to reach what you are describing. I think the framework itself is going to be a tricky thing because different NFVI hosts have different resource and use algorithms… Anyway – just sharing my thoughts. Thanks, Mike From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of "Kunzmann, Gerald" mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>> Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 5:38 AM To: "Kashyap, Madhu" mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>, "Gangur, Hrushikesh" mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>, Arturo
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Hi Mike, Your thoughts are highly valuable and appreciated. Isn’t the current OpenStack already the platform / environment that we are talking about? I agree that the platform providers’ interest is to create a common framework that fits as many users as possible. Isn’t it then now the stage to write down our specific Telco use cases and based on that identify the gaps and let the “innovative program coders” expand the(ir) platform to meet our use cases? Also, the PWG has already defined this kind of template/approach and somehow if we want to bring our use cases/requirements through the PWG we should follow it. It would be a different story and we would need to include the PWG folks if we want to fundamentally question/change their approach proposing a different value path. Or did I mis-read your message? Best regards, Gerald From: Bugenhagen, Michael K [mailto:michael.k.bugenha...@centurylink.com] Sent: Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 15:32 To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Kashyap, Madhu ; Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Gerald, I’m going to suggest a slightly different “value” path - First establish what the framework for delivering capacity is - THEN see if one can use it to satisfy the use cases, and identify the gaps. In compute, and Cloud when one makes a platform / Environment, you don’t do a use case on every application that can be made, you document the platform, and how it functions and then you let the innovative program coders expand how to use it. i.e. – you expose a framework, they utilize it. The role of the platform provider is to evolve and maintain a common framework that works for all the users… vs. trying to build every single user story In a closed system dev. View one does create all the system use, cases – in Open platforms / OS efforts we’re really more focused enabling the environment / platform vs. depicting all the users stories. So – I would recommend identifying the “frameworks” for “resource management” and “use management” in both the Telecom bearer path, and the Cloud service platforms “first” and then use those frameworks to describe what can be done, and what gaps exist. Example a) What are the “components” (resource levels) or entities we are applying use control (CAC) to b) Identify what “utilization frameworks” do those components use c) Identify the “load sharing / dedicated” resource schema those components use (what are the algorithms used across the resource entity for weighted, dedicated, or shared use). Providers “do this” when designing our platform design. Aka - QoS marking built for QoE goals.. in our forwarding plane q’s. We need to do the same exercise here. What are the QoS mechanisms in Cloud, and how are they applied to reach what you are describing. I think the framework itself is going to be a tricky thing because different NFVI hosts have different resource and use algorithms… Anyway – just sharing my thoughts. Thanks, Mike From: mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of "Kunzmann, Gerald" mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>> Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 5:38 AM To: "Kashyap, Madhu" mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>, "Gangur, Hrushikesh" mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>, Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Cc: "Souville, Bertrand" mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>, "Thulasi, Arun" mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, I agree with the increase of complexity. Looking at the other use cases, they are much more simply/short. In order not to confuse others and to get the important use cases agreed soon, I propose to limit the changes and consider to add some details –if needed- at a later stage. Detailed comments: - Existing text introduces cloud service providers (CSP). The new proposed text adds the same abbreviation for Communication Service Providers. This should be avoided. - Proposal to shorten/simplify the new paragraph on VNFs and VNFDs? - What you call generic reservation is already an agreed use case, so we should keep this level of granularity and also IMHO we should not touch/change other use cases as we haven’t talked to the contributor of those use cases and may not know their intention behind. - The proposed part on “minimal set of parameters” could be misleading as we would like to have the option to specify those param
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Gerald, I’m going to suggest a slightly different “value” path - First establish what the framework for delivering capacity is - THEN see if one can use it to satisfy the use cases, and identify the gaps. In compute, and Cloud when one makes a platform / Environment, you don’t do a use case on every application that can be made, you document the platform, and how it functions and then you let the innovative program coders expand how to use it. i.e. – you expose a framework, they utilize it. The role of the platform provider is to evolve and maintain a common framework that works for all the users… vs. trying to build every single user story In a closed system dev. View one does create all the system use, cases – in Open platforms / OS efforts we’re really more focused enabling the environment / platform vs. depicting all the users stories. So – I would recommend identifying the “frameworks” for “resource management” and “use management” in both the Telecom bearer path, and the Cloud service platforms “first” and then use those frameworks to describe what can be done, and what gaps exist. Example a) What are the “components” (resource levels) or entities we are applying use control (CAC) to b) Identify what “utilization frameworks” do those components use c) Identify the “load sharing / dedicated” resource schema those components use (what are the algorithms used across the resource entity for weighted, dedicated, or shared use). Providers “do this” when designing our platform design. Aka - QoS marking built for QoE goals.. in our forwarding plane q’s. We need to do the same exercise here. What are the QoS mechanisms in Cloud, and how are they applied to reach what you are describing. I think the framework itself is going to be a tricky thing because different NFVI hosts have different resource and use algorithms… Anyway – just sharing my thoughts. Thanks, Mike From: on behalf of "Kunzmann, Gerald" Date: Friday, October 7, 2016 at 5:38 AM To: "Kashyap, Madhu" , "Gangur, Hrushikesh" , Arturo Martin De Nicolas , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: "Souville, Bertrand" , "Thulasi, Arun" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, I agree with the increase of complexity. Looking at the other use cases, they are much more simply/short. In order not to confuse others and to get the important use cases agreed soon, I propose to limit the changes and consider to add some details –if needed- at a later stage. Detailed comments: - Existing text introduces cloud service providers (CSP). The new proposed text adds the same abbreviation for Communication Service Providers. This should be avoided. - Proposal to shorten/simplify the new paragraph on VNFs and VNFDs? - What you call generic reservation is already an agreed use case, so we should keep this level of granularity and also IMHO we should not touch/change other use cases as we haven’t talked to the contributor of those use cases and may not know their intention behind. - The proposed part on “minimal set of parameters” could be misleading as we would like to have the option to specify those parameters, but we don’t want to enforce those parameters to all use cases, i.e. the parameter shall be available but its usage is optional. What about changing this part to use cases that require those parameters? · Start time: is already there in the existing use cases: future start time in 1+2; immediate start time in 3 (to be more explicit on this we could add a “from now”, but IMHO no strong need). · Expiry time: I had a proposal in my first draft of this (see email August 25th): * As a CSP, I want to be able to cancel a RUR if the user has not started using the requested capacity in a given time window after the planned start time of the RUR. Note, this is similar to a "no-show" rule for hotel and restaurant bookings. We could also hold back this item for the time being and add it in a later revision once the main part on the reservation of instances is approved. · Compute (vCPU, RAM), network and storage volume are already covered by other use cases. “Future items” can be added in a later revision. See also the attached revision of the document. Best regards, Gerald From: Kashyap, Madhu [mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 00:48 To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Ashiq Khan Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Perhaps this is getting a little complicated with different reservation requests (discrete or aggregate) and confidence levels (guaranteed or best effort). Here’s a
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
16 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG-GK2-MK-GK3.docx Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG-GK2-MK-GK3.docx ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
adhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Ashiq Khan mailto:k...@nttdocomo.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Dear all, Sorry for the delay, I had been on a 2 week vacation. Attached a new version addressing, amongst others, Arturo's comments. @Madhu: Can you try to finalize the document and input it to the next meeting of the PWG? Best regards, Gerald From: Gangur, Hrushikesh [mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 20:37 To: Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Madhu - looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Gerald, Best effort is a customer top down abstraction so I think it may be correct. The question becomes are we mapping “CAC” behavior (policy) to a Best effort request?? The industry doesn’t really have a industry wide Best effort SLA description…although I have seen some move to % loss and Latency with lower availability somewhat globally. Regards, Mike From: on behalf of "Kunzmann, Gerald" Date: Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 5:23 AM To: "Kashyap, Madhu" , "Gangur, Hrushikesh" , Arturo Martin De Nicolas , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: "Souville, Bertrand" , "Thulasi, Arun" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Thanks for the updated version based on the PWG discussions. My comments: - I would not use the term “best-effort” for the reservation requests as we also would like to get a guarantee on the requested aggregated resources. oWhat about the terms “discrete” and “aggregate”? oAlternatively, introduce two levels of granularity “discrete” / “aggregate” and in addition introduce two levels of “confidence”, i.e. “guaranteed” vs “planned (best-effort)”, where you can indicate a) that you want to do a reservation to have a guaranteed access to the resources or b) you inform the CSP about the planned usage of resources such that the CSP can improve his capacity mgmt.. § Should we distinguish between a resource reservation request (RRR) and a planned resource usage notification (RUN)? o - I am not sure about the term “prescribed”; would you use it when talking about the VNFD or did you mean s/prescribed/described/? Best regards, Gerald From: Kashyap, Madhu [mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 28. September 2016 20:37 To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Ashiq Khan Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Gerald and all, Based on the call from a couple weeks ago, I have made some changes to reflect what we discussed. The main point is that there are two kinds of reservation requests: 1. Guaranteed – this is based on discrete, specific requests as described in the VNFD 2. Best-effort – these are requests based on aggregate resources such as “give me 60 vCPUs, 240 Gig RAM, 600 GIG disk etc.” Please review the attached doc in detail and provide feedback. Let’s try to close on this soon so we can provide the reviews back to PWG. Best regards -Madhu From: Kunzmann, Gerald [mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:47 AM To: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Ashiq Khan mailto:k...@nttdocomo.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Dear all, I have had the chance to discuss this document with Arturo in today’s Promise call and I have updated the document based on his comments – see attachment. Best regards, Gerald From: Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 17:51 To: 'Gangur, Hrushikesh' mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Ashiq Khan mailto:k...@nttdocomo.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Dear all, Sorry for the delay, I had been on a 2 week vacation. Attached a new version addressing, amongst others, Arturo’s comments. @Madhu: Can you try to finalize the document and input it to the next meeting of the PWG? Best regards, Gerald From: Gangur, Hrushikesh [mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 20:37 To: Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Madhu – looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, Septembe
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
omments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Hi Gerald and all, Based on the call from a couple weeks ago, I have made some changes to reflect what we discussed. The main point is that there are two kinds of reservation requests: 1. Guaranteed - this is based on discrete, specific requests as described in the VNFD 2. Best-effort - these are requests based on aggregate resources such as "give me 60 vCPUs, 240 Gig RAM, 600 GIG disk etc." Please review the attached doc in detail and provide feedback. Let's try to close on this soon so we can provide the reviews back to PWG. Best regards -Madhu From: Kunzmann, Gerald [mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:47 AM To: Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Kashyap, Madhu ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Ashiq Khan Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Dear all, I have had the chance to discuss this document with Arturo in today's Promise call and I have updated the document based on his comments - see attachment. Best regards, Gerald From: Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 17:51 To: 'Gangur, Hrushikesh' mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Ashiq Khan mailto:k...@nttdocomo.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Dear all, Sorry for the delay, I had been on a 2 week vacation. Attached a new version addressing, amongst others, Arturo's comments. @Madhu: Can you try to finalize the document and input it to the next meeting of the PWG? Best regards, Gerald From: Gangur, Hrushikesh [mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 20:37 To: Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Madhu - looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, M
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Dear all, I have had the chance to discuss this document with Arturo in today's Promise call and I have updated the document based on his comments - see attachment. Best regards, Gerald From: Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 17:51 To: 'Gangur, Hrushikesh' ; Kashyap, Madhu ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Ashiq Khan Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Dear all, Sorry for the delay, I had been on a 2 week vacation. Attached a new version addressing, amongst others, Arturo's comments. @Madhu: Can you try to finalize the document and input it to the next meeting of the PWG? Best regards, Gerald From: Gangur, Hrushikesh [mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 20:37 To: Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Madhu - looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: Arturo Martin De Nicolas mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com>>; Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG-GK2.docx Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG-GK2.docx ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Dear all, Sorry for the delay, I had been on a 2 week vacation. Attached a new version addressing, amongst others, Arturo's comments. @Madhu: Can you try to finalize the document and input it to the next meeting of the PWG? Best regards, Gerald From: Gangur, Hrushikesh [mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2016 20:37 To: Kashyap, Madhu ; Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; Kunzmann, Gerald ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Madhu - looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; Kunzmann, Gerald ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG-GK.DOCX Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG-GK.DOCX ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Madhu - looks good and see my comments with emphasis on VNFD being a primary source of RUR elements. From: Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: Arturo Martin De Nicolas ; Kunzmann, Gerald ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald mailto:kunzm...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Kashyap, Madhu mailto:madhu.kash...@hpe.com>>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand mailto:souvi...@docomolab-euro.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>>; Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>> Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG.docx Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN-HJG.docx ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Hi, I have edited the document to reflect the scope of the RUR. Please review and comment. Also added a few comments. Arturo, I have not addressed your comments. Perhaps Gerald can shed some light on your comments. Best Regards -Madhu From: Arturo Martin De Nicolas [mailto:arturo.martin-de-nico...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:14 AM To: Kunzmann, Gerald ; Kashyap, Madhu ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand ; Thulasi, Arun ; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: RE: [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hpe.com>>; Thulasi, Arun mailto:arun.thul...@hpe.com>> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN.docx Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN.docx ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Hi Madhu, Gerald, all. Please, see some comments from my side. Best regards, Arturo From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kunzmann, Gerald Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:06 PM To: Kashyap, Madhu; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Souville, Bertrand; Thulasi, Arun; Gangur, Hrushikesh Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN.docx Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK-AMN.docx ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story
Hi Madhu, all, Find attached a commented version of the user story. I believe we need to do further changes to make it read more like a user story instead of specific detailed requirements. I am not sure defining requirements would be accepted by the PWG. Looking forward to your feedback. Best regards, Gerald From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Kashyap, Madhu Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 20:19 To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: Gangur, Hrushikesh ; Thulasi, Arun Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Promise]Capacity Management User Story Hi, As discussed during the call, attached is the capacity management user story with my edits. Please review and provide comments. Also think about the granularity of the scope the reservation request. Thanks -Madhu Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK.docx Description: Capacity_Management_User_Story-MK-GK.docx ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
